What this is
What is a combustible dust assessment?
What is a combustible dust assessment?
It is the record confirming whether dust from a specific material (flour, milk powder, sugar, starch, protein powder or packaging dust) can accumulate somewhere in the process and ignite, and what stops that happening. It scores material properties, where the dust can form or settle, ignition sources, and the protection in place, then rolls those into a residual risk band.
Which materials does this assessment cover?
The material field is restricted to flour, milk powder, sugar, starch, protein powder and packaging dust, the powders actually handled in food manufacturing. A metalworking or woodworking dust hazard belongs to a different template, built against different ignition and explosibility data.
Why is particle size scored separately from housekeeping?
Particle size and moisture content determine whether the material can form an explosible cloud at all, a property of the substance itself. Housekeeping determines whether enough of it has accumulated for that property to matter. A site can score well on one and badly on the other.
Scope
When is a combustible dust assessment required?
This assessment is one step in a larger programme. Using it for work that belongs to a neighbouring template produces records that are hard to report on later.
Use this template when
- A new dust-generating material or process (flour, milk powder, sugar, starch, protein powder, packaging dust) is introduced, or an existing one changes materially
- The workspace is being set up, or the register needs an entry added or retired
- You are running the Machine Safety programme and this is one of its steps
- A linked record needs this one to exist: fire risk, housekeeping, DSEAR zoning
- The zoning record this assessment depends on (ENV-050) is overdue, missing, or being reconfirmed
Do not use it for
- Machine Risk Assessment, which assesses general mechanical hazards on a machine rather than whether the dust generated around it can accumulate and ignite.
- Robot and Automation Safety Assessment, which assesses collaborative and caged robotic cells for safeguarding, speed and separation, teach mode and recovery from fault.
- Conveyor and Transfer Safety Review, which reviews an entire conveyor line for nip points, pull cords, crossovers, start warnings and jam clearing arrangements.
- Housekeeping inspection records, which check general cleaning standards rather than the overhead accumulation and ignition source controls a dust explosion assessment demands.
- Anything outside KnowSafe, which belongs in the workspace that owns that process.
Compliance mapping
Which ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2 requirements does this satisfy?
ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2 requires the hazard identified and the risk assessed before controls are relied on; for dust that means confirming explosibility and accumulation before the residual band is scored.
| Clause | Requirement | Where it lands |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1 | Identify the hazard, including the specific material and the process that generates it | Material properties |
| ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1 | Identify how the hazard can arise, under routine and abnormal conditions | Where dust can form or accumulate |
| ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1 | Identify sources capable of triggering the hazard once it is present | Ignition sources |
| ISO 45001 cl.6.1.1 | Apply the hierarchy of controls when selecting measures, rather than defaulting to administrative controls | Outcome |
| ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.2 | Determine the residual risk and whether it is acceptable against the organisation's criteria | Outcome |
| ISO 45001 cl.5.4 | Consult exposed workers on the hazard and the controls placed around it | Protection |
| ISO 45001 cl.6.1.1 | Select physical protection measures where elimination and substitution are not reasonably practicable | Protection |
| ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1 | Record who carried out the identification, and where it applies | Header |
What it does not cover
- An assessor marked 'Partly' competent, which means every scored input downstream is only as reliable as a partially qualified read of the hazard.
- Dust test data marked 'No' or 'Partial', which turns the explosibility classification into an assumption the residual band cannot be defended against.
- A heavy overhead accumulation recorded alongside a low residual band, which treats a visible, unaddressed hazard as if already resolved.
- A zoning record marked 'Overdue' or 'None' on a process still running, which means the electrical and ignition controls below it were never confirmed against the hazard.
- An action marked 'Required' with no CAPA reference entered, which leaves a known residual risk with no record of what is meant to close it.
Global
Combustible Dust Assessment requirements by country
Combustible dust sits under different instruments depending on where the site operates, and the record needs to answer whichever one applies.
NFPA 652 (Fundamentals of Combustible Dust), read with NFPA 61 for agricultural and food facilities
NFPA 652 requires a documented Dust Hazard Analysis covering explosibility, accumulation and ignition sources, reviewed at least every five years or on process change
The material properties and accumulation sections here effectively stand in for the DHA; Next Review Due needs to match that cycle, not the site's general audit calendar
Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002 (DSEAR)
DSEAR requires an explosive atmosphere risk assessment and, where a hazard is confirmed, a zoning classification of where and how long it can occur
The Zoning Record ID linking to ENV-050 is not decorative under DSEAR; an assessment scored without a current zoning record behind it has not actually classified the areas it claims to control
ATEX Directive 2014/34/EU for equipment, read with workplace directive 1999/92/EC
Equipment installed in a zoned area must carry ATEX certification for that zone, and the zoning itself must be documented and kept current
Electrical Equipment Suitable For Zone is an ATEX conformity question; 'Partly' means some equipment in the area is not rated for the zone it sits in
How to complete it
How to complete a combustible dust assessment, step by step
The fields are straightforward to fill in. What decides whether the finished record would survive scrutiny is a smaller set of judgement calls the form itself cannot make.
Explosibility Confirmed By Test scores 'Assumed' at 1, not 0, because assumption from a known similar material is defensible for some low-volume powders. The call is whether this material is similar enough to bear that weight, or different enough (finer, drier, new supplier) that the assumption is a guess wearing the form's language.
Accumulation On Surfaces and Accumulation On Overhead Surfaces both offer 'None', 'Light' and 'Heavy' with no thickness threshold on the form. Layer Depth Above Threshold exists because those words are subjective; an honest completion ties a described threshold to what they mean here, and keeps it consistent between assessments.
Highest Control Level Applied scores Administrative at 1 and PPE at 0, well below Engineer or Separate/isolate at 3. Recording 'Administrative' as final, rather than a holding position pending a scoped fix, is the difference between an honest assessment and one that quietly downgrades the hazard to fit what's in place.
Workers Aware Of The Hazard is scored, so it needs evidence behind it, not an assumption a past toolbox talk covers it. The call is what counts as current awareness for the people working the area now, given DSEAR and cl.5.4 both expect consultation, not a training record.
What auditors find
Most common combustible dust assessment findings
The same gaps recur across sites running this assessment, most visible from the record itself without visiting the floor.
| Finding | Clause | What fixes it |
|---|---|---|
| Assessor Competent marked 'Partly' on an assessment already set to Complete | ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1 | Route back to In progress until a competent assessor confirms the findings or reassesses the areas in doubt; a partial competence flag on a closed record is an open question wearing a closed status. |
| Particle size and minimum ignition energy left unanswered on a fine powder material | ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1 | For flour, milk powder and starch, treat Particle Size Under 500 Microns and Minimum Ignition Energy Known as effectively mandatory, whatever the required flag says. |
| Accumulation On Overhead Surfaces scored 'Heavy' with no linked action | ISO 45001 cl.6.1.1 | A heavy overhead layer is the confirmed presence of what this assessment exists to control; set Action Required to Yes and raise a CAPA before the record closes. |
| Cleaning Method Avoids Raising Clouds scored 'No', with compressed air blow-down as the method | ISO 45001 cl.6.1.1 | Blow-down needs replacing with vacuum extraction or damp methods rated for the material before the ignition source and accumulation sections mean anything. |
| Zoning Record ID blank, or pointing at an ENV-050 assessment scored 'Overdue' | ISO 45001 cl.5.4 | Electrical Equipment Suitable For Zone and Bonding And Earthing In Place cannot be honestly scored without a current zoning record; treat an overdue one as blocking closure, not a parallel action. |
| Residual Band scored 'Low, 1 to 4' beside a 'Heavy' accumulation answer elsewhere on the record | ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.2 | Walk the scored fields back through before accepting the band; a low score beside an unresolved heavy accumulation is a maths error, not a risk judgement. |
Case in point
Case in point: the cable tray nobody scored
A flour handling line passed its combustible dust assessment with a 'Low' residual band. Every field pointed the same way: assessor competent, dust test data on file, housekeeping adequate, surfaces clean. The overhead cable tray running the mixing room, three metres up, was scored 'Light' on Accumulation On Overhead Surfaces on the strength of a glance from the floor rather than an inspection above it.
The layer on that tray had been building for close to a year. Nothing forced a closer look, because 'Light' is a valid answer with no defined threshold, and the form had no way to flag a mismatch between a floor-level glance and an actual inspection overhead. The gap sat unresolved until the next cycle, not because a field was answered dishonestly, but because the judgement behind 'Light' was never made explicit enough to challenge.
The template
The template, field by field
The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.
6 sections
- Reference
- SAF-175
- Archetype
- Assessment
- Record ID
- CDA-2026-000
- Scoring
- Residual band
- Direction
- Low is good
- Singleton
- Yes
- Basis
- ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2
- Links
- Links Fire risk, Housekeeping, DSEAR
- Tags
- Manufacturing, Dust
- Sections
- 6
- Fields
- 55
- Follow up fields
- 3
- Repeating sections
- 0
- Links out
- 4
Header
12 fieldsAssessment ID*
Auto sequence. Format CDA-2026-000.
The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.
Status*
Drives who this goes to next.
- Planned2 pts
- In progress2 pts
- Complete3 pts
- Deferred0 pts
- Open0 pts
- Closed3 pts
- Overdue0 pts
Date and Time*
Completed By*
Site*
Site ID*
Format SITE-000.
Links to FDN-001 Site ID
Area
The area within the site.
Exact Location
Drop a pin for anything hard to find.
The Second Explosion Does The Damage
A primary event in a vessel is survivable. It shakes accumulated dust off beams and ledges into the air, and the secondary explosion takes the building.
Material*
Flour, milk powder, sugar, starch, protein powder, packaging dust or other.
Assessor Competent*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Dust Test Data Available*
- Yes3 pts
- Partial1 pt
- No0 pts
Material properties
6 fieldsExplosibility Confirmed By Test*
- Yes3 pts
- Assumed1 pt
- No0 pts
Particle Size Under 500 Microns*
- No3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- Yes0 pts
Minimum Ignition Energy Known
- Yes3 pts
- No0 pts
Moisture Content Reduces Risk
- Yes3 pts
- Marginal1 pt
- No0 pts
Dust Class Or Kst Value
Data Sheet Held*
- Yes3 pts
- No0 pts
Where dust can form or accumulate
8 fieldsDust Clouds Inside Equipment*
- No3 pts
- Occasional1 pt
- Routine0 pts
Dust Clouds In The Room*
- No3 pts
- Occasional1 pt
- Routine0 pts
Accumulation On Surfaces*
- None3 pts
- Light1 pt
- Heavy0 pts
Accumulation On Overhead Surfaces*
Beams, cable trays, ledges and the tops of panels. The places nobody cleans because nobody looks up.
- None3 pts
- Light1 pt
- Heavy0 pts
Layer Depth Above Threshold*
- No3 pts
- Marginal1 pt
- Yes0 pts
Housekeeping Frequency Adequate*
- Yes3 pts
- Marginal1 pt
- No0 pts
Cleaning Method Avoids Raising Clouds*
Blowing down with compressed air creates the exact cloud you are trying to avoid.
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Vacuum Equipment Suitable For Zone*
- Yes3 pts
- Uncertain1 pt
- No0 pts
Ignition sources
8 fieldsElectrical Equipment Suitable For Zone*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Hot Surfaces Controlled*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Mechanical Sparks Controlled*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Static Discharge Controlled*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Bonding And Earthing In Place*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Hot Work Controlled In These Areas*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Foreign Material Removal Fitted
Magnets and sieves stop tramp metal that sparks inside a mill.
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Bearing And Overheat Monitoring
- Yes3 pts
- No0 pts
Protection
6 fieldsExplosion Relief Fitted Where Needed
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Relief Vented To A Safe Place
- Yes3 pts
- Uncertain1 pt
- No0 pts
Explosion Isolation Between Vessels
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Zoning Record Current*
- Yes3 pts
- Overdue1 pt
- None0 pts
Zoning Record ID
Links to ENV-050 Assessment ID
Workers Aware Of The Hazard*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Outcome
15 fieldsHighest Control Level Applied*
- Eliminate4 pts
- Substitute4 pts
- Engineer3 pts
- Separate or isolate3 pts
- Administrative1 pt
- PPE0 pts
Residual Band*
- Low, 1 to 45 pts
- Medium, 5 to 94 pts
- High, 10 to 142 pts
- Very high, 15 to 191 pt
- Extreme, 20 to 250 pts
Risk Acceptable*
- Yes3 pts
- Marginal1 pt
- No0 pts
Further Controls Required
Risk Assessment
Risk ID
Format RSK-2026-00000.
Links to FDN-012 Risk ID
Action Required*
Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.
- No2 pts
- Yes0 pts
Priority
- High0 pts
- Medium1 pt
- Low3 pts
CAPA ID
Format CAPA-2026-00000.
Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID
Action Owner
Next Review Due*
Assessor*
Signature*
Engineering Manager*
Second Signature*
SAF-175 · record IDs look like CDA-2026-000 · Links Fire risk, Housekeeping, DSEAR
Open in KnowellaRun it with agents
From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself
The form is the easy part. Keeping it current, routing it to the right owner and holding the evidence together is the work that actually slips.
Holds the combustible dust assessment against the site register, flags when a material or process change should trigger an early review, and keeps scored fields consistent with the linked zoning record.
Tracks the cleaning method, vacuum suitability and overhead access this assessment depends on, so a housekeeping schedule change doesn't quietly invalidate a residual band nobody re-scores.
Owns the DSEAR zoning record (ENV-050) this assessment links to, and flags when it goes overdue so the dust assessment isn't left resting on a stale classification.

Coordinates the crew, rolls completion and exceptions into one view, and holds every write for your approval before it touches a record.
This template lives in KnowSafe — safety and compliance. Incidents, hazards, permits, inspections and the critical controls behind them.
Meet KnowSafe→Glossary
Combustible Dust Assessment definitions and key terms
- Minimum ignition energy (MIE)
- The smallest energy, typically a spark or static discharge, needed to ignite a dust cloud of a given material. A low MIE means ordinary sources most sites tolerate, like static from plastic scoops, can trigger ignition.
- Kst value
- A measure of how violently a specific dust deflagrates once ignited, used to size explosion relief and rate protection equipment. It is material and particle-size specific, so one supplier's flour value doesn't transfer to another's.
- DSEAR
- The Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002, the UK instrument requiring risk assessment and zoning of areas where an explosive atmosphere can occur.
- Secondary explosion
- An explosion where a smaller, often survivable primary event dislodges accumulated dust into the air, creating a much larger cloud that then ignites. Most fatal dust incidents are secondary, not primary.
- Zoning (hazardous area classification)
- Dividing an area into zones by how likely and how long an explosive atmosphere is present, which dictates what equipment rating is permitted in each zone.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions about combustible dust assessment
Does this assessment replace a DSEAR risk assessment?+
It covers much of the same ground for dust, but the zoning classification it depends on (ENV-050) is a separate record. Treat the two as parts of the same obligation, not substitutes for each other.
What happens if dust test data isn't available for a material?+
Explosibility Confirmed By Test can be answered 'Assumed', scored lower than a confirmed test, honest where the assumption rests on a genuinely similar, well-characterised material. It is not a substitute for testing a different or higher-volume process.
Why does the form ask about moisture content?+
Moisture reduces the likelihood a dust cloud ignites and how violently it burns, so Moisture Content Reduces Risk is a genuine mitigating factor. It does not override a confirmed explosibility class; it adjusts the residual picture alongside it.
Is this a one-off assessment or does it need repeating?+
It is a singleton, one live record per site rather than one per event, reviewed and updated rather than recreated. A material or process change should trigger an earlier review regardless of the scheduled date.
Who should be the assessor on this record?+
Assessor Competent is scored precisely because 'who did this' matters to how much weight the answers carry. It should be someone who understands dust explosibility, not a general assessor working from a checklist for the first time.
How does this template link to the Machine Safety programme?+
It sits inside Machine Safety because the equipment that generates and disturbs dust, mills, sieves, conveyors, is the same equipment that programme covers for guarding and interlocks; the two views need to stay consistent.
Keep going
Related templates and programmes
Industries this is written for
Programmes this belongs to
Used together in Machine Safety
Lockout/Tagout Procedure (Machine Specific)
Sets out exactly how to isolate a specific machine, listing every energy source and isolation point
LOTO Periodic Inspection
Checks that a specific energy control procedure is being followed correctly in practice
Machine Risk Assessment
Assesses a machine across its whole life, including setup, running, cleaning, clearing jams and maintenance
Guarding Verification Checklist
Confirms that guards fitted to a machine match the risk assessment and cannot be easily defeated
Interlock Function Test
Tests that safety interlocks stop the machine when a guard is opened, and cannot be bypassed
Robot Cell Safety Assessment
Assesses an industrial or collaborative robot cell, covering reach, speed, force limits and how people enter the space
More in Manufacturing Safety
Robot and Automation Safety Assessment
Assesses collaborative and caged robotic cells for safeguarding, speed and separation, teach mode and recovery from fault
Conveyor and Transfer Safety Review
Reviews an entire conveyor line for nip points, pull cords, crossovers, start warnings and jam clearing arrangements

Written and reviewed by
Siddarth Singh
Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella
Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.
- Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
- MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
- MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
- Six Sigma Black Belt
Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:
- ISO 45001:2018 cl.6.1.2 — Hazard identification and assessment of risks and opportunities
- ISO 45001:2018 cl.5.4 — Consultation and participation of workers
- NFPA 652 — Standard on the Fundamentals of Combustible Dust
- Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002 (DSEAR), UK SI 2002/2776
- ATEX Directive 2014/34/EU — Equipment for use in potentially explosive atmospheres
This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.