Knowella

Combustible Dust Assessment

The recurring failure in dust hazard control isn't the first ignition, it's what has settled on the beams, cable trays and panel tops above the process, where nobody looks and blow-down with compressed air is still the default clean. A primary event inside a vessel is often survivable; it shakes that hidden layer loose, and the secondary explosion through the resulting cloud is what takes the building, not the equipment that started it.

KnowSafeAssessmentSAF-17555 fields across 6 sectionsFull researchSee the form

Reviewed by Siddarth SinghCSPLast reviewed 16 August 2026

Basis
ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2
Workspace
KnowSafe
Form type
Assessment
Completed by
A competent assessor
Review trigger
New or materially changed dust-generating process

The short version

  • Assessor competence and dust test data are scored inputs, not descriptive fields; if either is marked anything short of 'Yes', the residual band that follows is an estimate dressed as a measurement.
  • The form scores particle size, minimum ignition energy and moisture content, but captures the dust class or Kst value as free text only, so the explosibility classification is never held as queryable data.
  • Overhead accumulation on beams, cable trays and panel tops is scored separately from surface accumulation and housekeeping frequency, so a clean floor and a heavy overhead layer can sit on the same record.
  • Cleaning method and vacuum suitability are scored fields in their own right; a regime built around compressed air blow-down fails this assessment even where every surface reading looks acceptable.

What this is

What is a combustible dust assessment?

What is a combustible dust assessment?

It is the record confirming whether dust from a specific material (flour, milk powder, sugar, starch, protein powder or packaging dust) can accumulate somewhere in the process and ignite, and what stops that happening. It scores material properties, where the dust can form or settle, ignition sources, and the protection in place, then rolls those into a residual risk band.

Which materials does this assessment cover?

The material field is restricted to flour, milk powder, sugar, starch, protein powder and packaging dust, the powders actually handled in food manufacturing. A metalworking or woodworking dust hazard belongs to a different template, built against different ignition and explosibility data.

Why is particle size scored separately from housekeeping?

Particle size and moisture content determine whether the material can form an explosible cloud at all, a property of the substance itself. Housekeeping determines whether enough of it has accumulated for that property to matter. A site can score well on one and badly on the other.

Scope

When is a combustible dust assessment required?

This assessment is one step in a larger programme. Using it for work that belongs to a neighbouring template produces records that are hard to report on later.

Use this template when

  • A new dust-generating material or process (flour, milk powder, sugar, starch, protein powder, packaging dust) is introduced, or an existing one changes materially
  • The workspace is being set up, or the register needs an entry added or retired
  • You are running the Machine Safety programme and this is one of its steps
  • A linked record needs this one to exist: fire risk, housekeeping, DSEAR zoning
  • The zoning record this assessment depends on (ENV-050) is overdue, missing, or being reconfirmed

Do not use it for

  • Machine Risk Assessment, which assesses general mechanical hazards on a machine rather than whether the dust generated around it can accumulate and ignite.
  • Robot and Automation Safety Assessment, which assesses collaborative and caged robotic cells for safeguarding, speed and separation, teach mode and recovery from fault.
  • Conveyor and Transfer Safety Review, which reviews an entire conveyor line for nip points, pull cords, crossovers, start warnings and jam clearing arrangements.
  • Housekeeping inspection records, which check general cleaning standards rather than the overhead accumulation and ignition source controls a dust explosion assessment demands.
  • Anything outside KnowSafe, which belongs in the workspace that owns that process.

Compliance mapping

Which ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2 requirements does this satisfy?

ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2 requires the hazard identified and the risk assessed before controls are relied on; for dust that means confirming explosibility and accumulation before the residual band is scored.

ClauseRequirementWhere it lands
ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1Identify the hazard, including the specific material and the process that generates itMaterial properties
ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1Identify how the hazard can arise, under routine and abnormal conditionsWhere dust can form or accumulate
ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1Identify sources capable of triggering the hazard once it is presentIgnition sources
ISO 45001 cl.6.1.1Apply the hierarchy of controls when selecting measures, rather than defaulting to administrative controlsOutcome
ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.2Determine the residual risk and whether it is acceptable against the organisation's criteriaOutcome
ISO 45001 cl.5.4Consult exposed workers on the hazard and the controls placed around itProtection
ISO 45001 cl.6.1.1Select physical protection measures where elimination and substitution are not reasonably practicableProtection
ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1Record who carried out the identification, and where it appliesHeader

What it does not cover

  • An assessor marked 'Partly' competent, which means every scored input downstream is only as reliable as a partially qualified read of the hazard.
  • Dust test data marked 'No' or 'Partial', which turns the explosibility classification into an assumption the residual band cannot be defended against.
  • A heavy overhead accumulation recorded alongside a low residual band, which treats a visible, unaddressed hazard as if already resolved.
  • A zoning record marked 'Overdue' or 'None' on a process still running, which means the electrical and ignition controls below it were never confirmed against the hazard.
  • An action marked 'Required' with no CAPA reference entered, which leaves a known residual risk with no record of what is meant to close it.

Global

Combustible Dust Assessment requirements by country

Combustible dust sits under different instruments depending on where the site operates, and the record needs to answer whichever one applies.

United States

NFPA 652 (Fundamentals of Combustible Dust), read with NFPA 61 for agricultural and food facilities

NFPA 652 requires a documented Dust Hazard Analysis covering explosibility, accumulation and ignition sources, reviewed at least every five years or on process change

The material properties and accumulation sections here effectively stand in for the DHA; Next Review Due needs to match that cycle, not the site's general audit calendar

United Kingdom

Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002 (DSEAR)

DSEAR requires an explosive atmosphere risk assessment and, where a hazard is confirmed, a zoning classification of where and how long it can occur

The Zoning Record ID linking to ENV-050 is not decorative under DSEAR; an assessment scored without a current zoning record behind it has not actually classified the areas it claims to control

European Union

ATEX Directive 2014/34/EU for equipment, read with workplace directive 1999/92/EC

Equipment installed in a zoned area must carry ATEX certification for that zone, and the zoning itself must be documented and kept current

Electrical Equipment Suitable For Zone is an ATEX conformity question; 'Partly' means some equipment in the area is not rated for the zone it sits in

How to complete it

How to complete a combustible dust assessment, step by step

The fields are straightforward to fill in. What decides whether the finished record would survive scrutiny is a smaller set of judgement calls the form itself cannot make.

Whether 'assumed' explosibility is good enough to sign off

Explosibility Confirmed By Test scores 'Assumed' at 1, not 0, because assumption from a known similar material is defensible for some low-volume powders. The call is whether this material is similar enough to bear that weight, or different enough (finer, drier, new supplier) that the assumption is a guess wearing the form's language.

Where 'light' ends and 'heavy' accumulation begins

Accumulation On Surfaces and Accumulation On Overhead Surfaces both offer 'None', 'Light' and 'Heavy' with no thickness threshold on the form. Layer Depth Above Threshold exists because those words are subjective; an honest completion ties a described threshold to what they mean here, and keeps it consistent between assessments.

Whether administrative control is the interim answer or the final one

Highest Control Level Applied scores Administrative at 1 and PPE at 0, well below Engineer or Separate/isolate at 3. Recording 'Administrative' as final, rather than a holding position pending a scoped fix, is the difference between an honest assessment and one that quietly downgrades the hazard to fit what's in place.

What 'workers aware of the hazard' has to demonstrate

Workers Aware Of The Hazard is scored, so it needs evidence behind it, not an assumption a past toolbox talk covers it. The call is what counts as current awareness for the people working the area now, given DSEAR and cl.5.4 both expect consultation, not a training record.

What auditors find

Most common combustible dust assessment findings

The same gaps recur across sites running this assessment, most visible from the record itself without visiting the floor.

FindingClauseWhat fixes it
Assessor Competent marked 'Partly' on an assessment already set to CompleteISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1Route back to In progress until a competent assessor confirms the findings or reassesses the areas in doubt; a partial competence flag on a closed record is an open question wearing a closed status.
Particle size and minimum ignition energy left unanswered on a fine powder materialISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1For flour, milk powder and starch, treat Particle Size Under 500 Microns and Minimum Ignition Energy Known as effectively mandatory, whatever the required flag says.
Accumulation On Overhead Surfaces scored 'Heavy' with no linked actionISO 45001 cl.6.1.1A heavy overhead layer is the confirmed presence of what this assessment exists to control; set Action Required to Yes and raise a CAPA before the record closes.
Cleaning Method Avoids Raising Clouds scored 'No', with compressed air blow-down as the methodISO 45001 cl.6.1.1Blow-down needs replacing with vacuum extraction or damp methods rated for the material before the ignition source and accumulation sections mean anything.
Zoning Record ID blank, or pointing at an ENV-050 assessment scored 'Overdue'ISO 45001 cl.5.4Electrical Equipment Suitable For Zone and Bonding And Earthing In Place cannot be honestly scored without a current zoning record; treat an overdue one as blocking closure, not a parallel action.
Residual Band scored 'Low, 1 to 4' beside a 'Heavy' accumulation answer elsewhere on the recordISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.2Walk the scored fields back through before accepting the band; a low score beside an unresolved heavy accumulation is a maths error, not a risk judgement.

Case in point

Case in point: the cable tray nobody scored

A flour handling line passed its combustible dust assessment with a 'Low' residual band. Every field pointed the same way: assessor competent, dust test data on file, housekeeping adequate, surfaces clean. The overhead cable tray running the mixing room, three metres up, was scored 'Light' on Accumulation On Overhead Surfaces on the strength of a glance from the floor rather than an inspection above it.

The layer on that tray had been building for close to a year. Nothing forced a closer look, because 'Light' is a valid answer with no defined threshold, and the form had no way to flag a mismatch between a floor-level glance and an actual inspection overhead. The gap sat unresolved until the next cycle, not because a field was answered dishonestly, but because the judgement behind 'Light' was never made explicit enough to challenge.

The template

The template, field by field

The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.

55fields
6 sections
Reference
SAF-175
Archetype
Assessment
Record ID
CDA-2026-000
Scoring
Residual band
Direction
Low is good
Singleton
Yes
Basis
ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2
Links
Links Fire risk, Housekeeping, DSEAR
Tags
Manufacturing, Dust
Sections
6
Fields
55
Follow up fields
3
Repeating sections
0
Links out
4
Field typesOwn ID, generated on saveCase thread and parentPick list from a registryLinked to another templateFollow up, dashed outlineScored

Header

12 fields
Text

Assessment ID*

Generated on save

Auto sequence. Format CDA-2026-000.

The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.

Single Choice

Status*

Scored

Drives who this goes to next.

  • Planned2 pts
  • In progress2 pts
  • Complete3 pts
  • Deferred0 pts
  • Open0 pts
  • Closed3 pts
  • Overdue0 pts
Date & Time

Date and Time*

Users

Completed By*

Pick List

Site*

From FDN-001 Site NameFilter: Status is Active
Text

Site ID*

Linked

Format SITE-000.

Links to FDN-001 Site ID

Single Choice

Area

Optional

The area within the site.

Cutting roomBoning hallPackingChill storeFreezerPasteurisingFillingCulture roomDespatchYardWorkshopPlant roomOffices
Location

Exact Location

Optional

Drop a pin for anything hard to find.

Info

The Second Explosion Does The Damage

A primary event in a vessel is survivable. It shakes accumulated dust off beams and ledges into the air, and the secondary explosion takes the building.

Single Choice

Material*

Flour, milk powder, sugar, starch, protein powder, packaging dust or other.

FlourMilk powderSugarStarchProtein powderPackaging dust
Single Choice

Assessor Competent*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Dust Test Data Available*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • No0 pts

Material properties

6 fields
Single Choice

Explosibility Confirmed By Test*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Assumed1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Particle Size Under 500 Microns*

Scored
  • No3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Minimum Ignition Energy Known

OptionalScored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Moisture Content Reduces Risk

OptionalScored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Marginal1 pt
  • No0 pts
Text

Dust Class Or Kst Value

Optional
Single Choice

Data Sheet Held*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts

Where dust can form or accumulate

8 fields
Single Choice

Dust Clouds Inside Equipment*

Scored
  • No3 pts
  • Occasional1 pt
  • Routine0 pts
Single Choice

Dust Clouds In The Room*

Scored
  • No3 pts
  • Occasional1 pt
  • Routine0 pts
Single Choice

Accumulation On Surfaces*

Scored
  • None3 pts
  • Light1 pt
  • Heavy0 pts
Single Choice

Accumulation On Overhead Surfaces*

Scored

Beams, cable trays, ledges and the tops of panels. The places nobody cleans because nobody looks up.

  • None3 pts
  • Light1 pt
  • Heavy0 pts
Single Choice

Layer Depth Above Threshold*

Scored
  • No3 pts
  • Marginal1 pt
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Housekeeping Frequency Adequate*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Marginal1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Cleaning Method Avoids Raising Clouds*

Scored

Blowing down with compressed air creates the exact cloud you are trying to avoid.

  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Vacuum Equipment Suitable For Zone*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Uncertain1 pt
  • No0 pts

Ignition sources

8 fields
Single Choice

Electrical Equipment Suitable For Zone*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Hot Surfaces Controlled*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Mechanical Sparks Controlled*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Static Discharge Controlled*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Bonding And Earthing In Place*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Hot Work Controlled In These Areas*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Foreign Material Removal Fitted

OptionalScored

Magnets and sieves stop tramp metal that sparks inside a mill.

  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Bearing And Overheat Monitoring

OptionalScored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts

Protection

6 fields
Single Choice

Explosion Relief Fitted Where Needed

OptionalScored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Relief Vented To A Safe Place

OptionalScored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Uncertain1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Explosion Isolation Between Vessels

OptionalScored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Zoning Record Current*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Overdue1 pt
  • None0 pts
Text

Zoning Record ID

OptionalLinked

Links to ENV-050 Assessment ID

Single Choice

Workers Aware Of The Hazard*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts

Outcome

15 fields
Single Choice

Highest Control Level Applied*

Scored
  • Eliminate4 pts
  • Substitute4 pts
  • Engineer3 pts
  • Separate or isolate3 pts
  • Administrative1 pt
  • PPE0 pts
Single Choice

Residual Band*

Scored
  • Low, 1 to 45 pts
  • Medium, 5 to 94 pts
  • High, 10 to 142 pts
  • Very high, 15 to 191 pt
  • Extreme, 20 to 250 pts
Single Choice

Risk Acceptable*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Marginal1 pt
  • No0 pts
Text

Further Controls Required

Optional
Pick List

Risk Assessment

OptionalFrom FDN-012 Risk Title
Text

Risk ID

OptionalLinked

Format RSK-2026-00000.

Links to FDN-012 Risk ID

Single Choice

Action Required*

Scored

Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.

  • No2 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Priority

OptionalScoredShows if Action Required equals Yes
  • High0 pts
  • Medium1 pt
  • Low3 pts
Text

CAPA ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Action Required equals Yes

Format CAPA-2026-00000.

Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID

Users

Action Owner

OptionalShows if Action Required equals Yes
Date & Time

Next Review Due*

Users

Assessor*

Signature

Signature*

Users

Engineering Manager*

Signature

Second Signature*

SAF-175 · record IDs look like CDA-2026-000 · Links Fire risk, Housekeeping, DSEAR

Open in Knowella

Run it with agents

From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself

The form is the easy part. Keeping it current, routing it to the right owner and holding the evidence together is the work that actually slips.

KnowSafe

Holds the combustible dust assessment against the site register, flags when a material or process change should trigger an early review, and keeps scored fields consistent with the linked zoning record.

KnowMaintain

Tracks the cleaning method, vacuum suitability and overhead access this assessment depends on, so a housekeeping schedule change doesn't quietly invalidate a residual band nobody re-scores.

KnowEnviro

Owns the DSEAR zoning record (ENV-050) this assessment links to, and flags when it goes overdue so the dust assessment isn't left resting on a stale classification.

Ella
Ella

Coordinates the crew, rolls completion and exceptions into one view, and holds every write for your approval before it touches a record.

This template lives in KnowSafe — safety and compliance. Incidents, hazards, permits, inspections and the critical controls behind them.

Meet KnowSafe→

Glossary

Combustible Dust Assessment definitions and key terms

Minimum ignition energy (MIE)
The smallest energy, typically a spark or static discharge, needed to ignite a dust cloud of a given material. A low MIE means ordinary sources most sites tolerate, like static from plastic scoops, can trigger ignition.
Kst value
A measure of how violently a specific dust deflagrates once ignited, used to size explosion relief and rate protection equipment. It is material and particle-size specific, so one supplier's flour value doesn't transfer to another's.
DSEAR
The Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002, the UK instrument requiring risk assessment and zoning of areas where an explosive atmosphere can occur.
Secondary explosion
An explosion where a smaller, often survivable primary event dislodges accumulated dust into the air, creating a much larger cloud that then ignites. Most fatal dust incidents are secondary, not primary.
Zoning (hazardous area classification)
Dividing an area into zones by how likely and how long an explosive atmosphere is present, which dictates what equipment rating is permitted in each zone.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about combustible dust assessment

Does this assessment replace a DSEAR risk assessment?+

It covers much of the same ground for dust, but the zoning classification it depends on (ENV-050) is a separate record. Treat the two as parts of the same obligation, not substitutes for each other.

What happens if dust test data isn't available for a material?+

Explosibility Confirmed By Test can be answered 'Assumed', scored lower than a confirmed test, honest where the assumption rests on a genuinely similar, well-characterised material. It is not a substitute for testing a different or higher-volume process.

Why does the form ask about moisture content?+

Moisture reduces the likelihood a dust cloud ignites and how violently it burns, so Moisture Content Reduces Risk is a genuine mitigating factor. It does not override a confirmed explosibility class; it adjusts the residual picture alongside it.

Is this a one-off assessment or does it need repeating?+

It is a singleton, one live record per site rather than one per event, reviewed and updated rather than recreated. A material or process change should trigger an earlier review regardless of the scheduled date.

Who should be the assessor on this record?+

Assessor Competent is scored precisely because 'who did this' matters to how much weight the answers carry. It should be someone who understands dust explosibility, not a general assessor working from a checklist for the first time.

How does this template link to the Machine Safety programme?+

It sits inside Machine Safety because the equipment that generates and disturbs dust, mills, sieves, conveyors, is the same equipment that programme covers for guarding and interlocks; the two views need to stay consistent.

Keep going

Related templates and programmes

Siddarth Singh

Written and reviewed by

Siddarth Singh

Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella

Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.

  • Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
  • MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
  • MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
  • Six Sigma Black Belt
Verify with BCSP →

Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:

  • ISO 45001:2018 cl.6.1.2 — Hazard identification and assessment of risks and opportunities
  • ISO 45001:2018 cl.5.4 — Consultation and participation of workers
  • NFPA 652 — Standard on the Fundamentals of Combustible Dust
  • Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002 (DSEAR), UK SI 2002/2776
  • ATEX Directive 2014/34/EU — Equipment for use in potentially explosive atmospheres

This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.

Start in Minutes, Not Weeks

Launch a Ready-Made Template and Customize It Your Way

Every template is fully editable. Adjust fields, workflows, and branding to match your processes, then deploy to your team instantly.