Knowella

High Potential Risk Review

A focused review of the risks that could kill or seriously injure, separate from the general register. Run twice a year. Carried out by senior management. Keeps attention on the small number of things that actually matter most.

KnowSafeReviewSAF-066Pinned in navigation
Completed by
Carried out by senior management
Raised
At the review interval, and after any trigger event

Summary

In short

  • A high potential risk review is a review used in KnowSafe that a focused review of the risks that could kill or seriously injure, separate from the general register. It is built against ICMM critical risk practice and forms part of the Critical Control and Fatal Risk programme.
  • Run twice a year. Carried out by senior management.
  • The template holds 31 fields across 3 sections, with fatal risks repeating for each entry.
  • Scoring is barrier health, control gaps, where high is good.
  • ICMM is international Council on Mining and Metals. Publishes critical control management, widely borrowed outside mining for fatal risk control.
  • It connects to the rest of the library: links Bowtie, Critical Controls.

What it is

What it is

What is a high potential risk review?

A high potential risk review is a review used in KnowSafe that a focused review of the risks that could kill or seriously injure, separate from the general register. It is built against ICMM critical risk practice and forms part of the Critical Control and Fatal Risk programme.

When is a high potential risk review completed?

A high potential risk review is completed at the review interval, and after any trigger event. Run twice a year.

When to use it

When to use it, and when not to

This review is one step in a larger programme. Using it for work that belongs to a neighbouring template produces records that are hard to report on later.

Use it for

  • The event or activity this review covers has occurred, or is about to
  • A new record is needed; each one gets its own ID in the form HPR-2026-000
  • You are running the Critical Control and Fatal Risk programme and this is one of its steps
  • A linked record needs this one to exist: links bowtie, critical controls

Not for

  • Job Safety Analysis, which breaks a job into steps, finds the hazards in each and sets the controls.
  • Pre-Task Risk Assessment, which a short check done by the crew right before work starts, covering what has changed today.
  • Task Risk Assessment, which a fuller assessment of a task, its hazards and its controls, using the shared risk method.
  • Anything outside KnowSafe, which belongs in the workspace that owns that process

Standards

What it is built against

ICMMInternational Council on Mining and Metals

Publishes critical control management, widely borrowed outside mining for fatal risk control.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the high potential risk review template based on?+

It is built against ICMM critical risk practice. ICMM is international Council on Mining and Metals. Publishes critical control management, widely borrowed outside mining for fatal risk control.

What sections does the high potential risk review contain?+

There are 3 sections: header, fatal risks, result. Together they hold 31 fields, 27 of which are required.

How often is a high potential risk review raised?+

A new record is raised at the review interval, and after any trigger event. Each one is given an ID in the form HPR-2026-000, so it can be traced and referenced from other records.

Which programme does the high potential risk review belong to?+

It is part of Critical Control and Fatal Risk. Named fatal risks with owned critical controls and a verification schedule that is actually run.

How is a high potential risk review scored?+

Scoring is barrier health, control gaps. High is good. Scores exist to make the form tell you something, not to produce a percentage for its own sake.

Can the high potential risk review template be changed?+

Yes. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it. Most teams install it as it is, run it for a cycle, then adjust.

The agents

What the agents do with it

The form is the easy part. Keeping it current, routing it to the right owner and holding the evidence together is the work that actually slips.

KnowSafe

Holds the high potential risk review library against your registers, routes each record to its owner, and keeps the evidence trail together.

Ella

Coordinates the crew, rolls completion and exceptions into one view, and holds every write for your approval before it touches a record.

This template lives in KnowSafesafety and compliance. Incidents, hazards, permits, inspections and the critical controls behind them.

Meet KnowSafe

Sources

Sources

  • ICMM — International Council on Mining and Metals

KnowSafe

Also in Risk Studies

6Browse the whole library
Assessment

Job Safety Analysis

Breaks a job into steps, finds the hazards in each and sets the controls. Done before new or changed work and reviewed yearly. Carried out by a supervisor with the people who do the job. The most useful safety document on most sites, because the workers write it.

Assessment

Pre-Task Risk Assessment

A short check done by the crew right before work starts, covering what has changed today. Done at the start of every shift or task. Completed by the crew together in a few minutes. Catches the conditions that a yearly assessment can never predict.

Assessment

Task Risk Assessment

A fuller assessment of a task, its hazards and its controls, using the shared risk method. Done when a task is new, has changed or has caused problems. Carried out by a trained assessor with the work team. Feeds the controls into the JSA and the training.

Assessment

Hazard Identification Study

A structured search for hazards across an area, process or new installation. Run at design stage and on a set review cycle. Carried out by a team drawn from operations, maintenance and safety. Feeds the risk register rather than producing a standalone document.

Assessment

Bowtie Analysis

Maps a major hazard from its causes through to its consequences, and shows which barriers sit in between. Built for each fatal risk and reviewed yearly. Carried out by a facilitated team. Produces the critical controls that then get their own verification schedule.

Assessment

What If Study

A guided team discussion asking what could go wrong at each stage of a process. Run for new processes or before a significant change. Led by a facilitator with operations and engineering. Simple to run and surprisingly effective at finding gaps others miss.

Start in Minutes, Not Weeks

Launch a Ready-Made Template and Customize It Your Way

Every template is fully editable. Adjust fields, workflows, and branding to match your processes, then deploy to your team instantly.