What this is
What is a microbiological result record?
What is a microbiological result record?
It is the record that checks one microbiological test result, for one organism, against a documented specification limit, and captures the response where the result is out. It is completed the moment a result arrives from the laboratory, in house or external, and is reviewed by quality with a technical manager countersignature before it closes.
When is a microbiological result record completed?
It is completed at the moment the result arrives, not reconstructed afterwards from memory. The days-to-result field exists precisely to make that turnaround visible, so a result that sat unrecorded for a week cannot be backdated to look routine.
How does this differ from the laboratory sample log?
The sample log records that a sample was taken, what it was, and where it went. This record starts once the laboratory's result for that sample comes back, and it exists specifically to judge that result against a limit and decide what happens next. A sample can sit logged for days with no result record against it yet; the two are sequential, not interchangeable.
Scope
When is a microbiological result record required?
This record judges one micro result against its own limit and decides the immediate response. Sampling itself, verifying the test method, and running the root-cause investigation that follows each belong to a different template.
Use this template when
- A microbiological test result has come back from the laboratory, in house or external, for a sample already logged
- The workspace is being set up, or the register needs an entry added or retired
- You are running the Laboratory and Testing programme and this is one of its steps
- A linked record needs this one to exist: links sample log, holds, trending
- A result needs checking against a specification limit before a hold, withdrawal, or authority notification decision is made
Do not use it for
- Laboratory Sample Log, which logs every sample taken for testing, with what it is, why it was taken and where it went.
- Chemical and Compositional Result Record, which records analytical results for composition, additives, contaminants or nutritional claims, not microbiology.
- Laboratory Method Verification, which verifies that a test method performs as expected in your hands, on your matrix, before results are relied on.
- Out of Specification Investigation, which carries out the root-cause work this record only references by ID.
- Anything outside KnowQuality, which belongs in the workspace that owns that process
Compliance mapping
Which BRCGS cl.5.6 requirements does this satisfy?
BRCGS cl.5.6 requires micro results to be checked against a documented limit and a response to a failing result decided and recorded. The fields below carry that obligation through the form.
| Clause | Requirement | Where it lands |
|---|---|---|
| BRCGS cl.5.6 | The organism tested for, method used and sample it relates to are identified before the result is judged | Header |
| BRCGS cl.5.6 | The result is recorded with its units and checked against a documented specification limit | The result |
| BRCGS cl.5.6 | Turnaround from sampling to result is captured to support due-diligence timelines | The result |
| BRCGS cl.5.6 | Where a result is out of specification, the product's physical status is established before a response is decided | Product position |
| BRCGS cl.5.6 | Affected product is quantified and located, and a hold reference raised where the product is affected | Product position |
| BRCGS cl.5.6 | An out-of-specification investigation is opened and referenced, or its absence justified | Response |
| BRCGS cl.5.6 | Withdrawal is considered and the outcome recorded rather than left silent | Response |
| BRCGS cl.5.6 | The result is reviewed and countersigned by a second, more senior signatory before closure | Response |
What it does not cover
- Within Specification, which is marked Borderline or No with no Specification Limit value entered against it.
- Result Category, which stays marked Satisfactory while Within Specification reads No.
- Investigation Opened, which is marked Not required for a result recorded as Unsatisfactory or Unacceptable and potentially hazardous.
- Hold ID, which is left blank while Product Affected By This Result reads Yes.
- Withdrawal Considered, which is left at Not required without Proportion Already Despatched having been checked first.
Global
Microbiological Result Record requirements by country
BRCGS certification travels with the product, so the instrument that actually gets tested in an audit, a recall, or a court depends on where the affected batch was sold, not where it was made.
Food Safety Act 1990 and the General Food Regulations 2004
Sets the underlying duty not to place unsafe food on the market, which BRCGS certification is audited evidence against.
The status, hold ID and withdrawal considered fields are what a UK site produces to show a positive result was acted on before, not after, an inspector or a customer asks.
Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs
Sets the actual organism-by-organism limits, sampling plans and process hygiene criteria that a result like a Listeria or Salmonella finding is checked against.
The organism tested for and specification limit fields exist to show which of this regulation's criteria applied to the sample, not a generic in-house limit invented after the fact.
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) preventive controls
Governs facilities exporting into the US, where an adulterated finding such as Salmonella or Listeria monocytogenes triggers mandatory corrective action and may require FDA notification.
The authority notification required and notification ID fields are what a BRCGS-certified exporter relies on to show a US-bound positive was escalated, not quietly retested.
How to complete it
How to complete a microbiological result record, step by step
Filling in every field does not make a micro result defensible on its own. Four judgement calls decide whether the response actually matches what happened.
Product Still On Site and Proportion Already Despatched are answered against a snapshot in time. If that snapshot is the moment the result arrived rather than a checked despatch record, a batch that partly left overnight can be recorded as fully on site, and the response follows the wrong assumption from that point on.
Result Category offers Satisfactory, Borderline, Unsatisfactory, and Unacceptable and potentially hazardous as distinct states, not a pass or fail. Whether a borderline reading opens an investigation or waits for the next sample point is a judgement the record has to carry explicitly, not default silently to no action.
Trend Versus Recent Results and Feeds Environmental Monitoring Review sit next to each other for a reason. A single worsening reading can be noise; the same reading against a run of prior results is a pattern the environmental monitoring review needs to see, and only a completed record makes that comparison possible.
Withdrawal Considered offers Not required, Considered and rejected, and Yes as different states with different evidential weight. Marking Not required for a result that only avoided withdrawal because none of the affected product had shipped is a different position than genuinely never needing to consider it.
What auditors find
Most common microbiological result record findings
These are the patterns that turn up most often when a microbiological result record is reviewed after the fact, rather than at the point the result was first read.
| Finding | Clause | What fixes it |
|---|---|---|
| Investigation opened marked Not required for a result recorded as Unsatisfactory, with no rationale captured anywhere on the record | BRCGS cl.5.6 | Block Not required as an answer whenever Result Category reads Unsatisfactory or worse, and require an OOS investigation ID instead. |
| Proportion Already Despatched recorded as None with no reference to a despatch or goods-out record checked at the time | BRCGS cl.5.6 | Require the despatch record reference to be entered alongside the answer, not accepted as a standalone statement. |
| Hold ID left blank despite Product Affected By This Result reading Yes | BRCGS cl.5.6 | Make the hold reference mandatory the moment product affected is answered Yes, before the record can move to Response. |
| Days To Result populated with no target turnaround defined anywhere, so a nine-day result and a same-day result score the same | BRCGS cl.5.6 | Add a target turnaround per organism and flag any result exceeding it, rather than recording the number with no threshold. |
| Result Trended marked Yes with no reference to the trending record or chart it draws on | BRCGS cl.5.6 | Require a trending record reference before Result Trended can be marked Yes. |
| Second Signature applied within minutes of the first, with no evidence the technical manager reviewed anything beyond the status field | BRCGS cl.5.6 | Timestamp both signatures separately and query any pair completed inside the same short window for genuine review. |
Case in point
Case in point: the positive that was recorded as still on site
A ready-to-eat site received a Listeria monocytogenes detected result four days after a chilled batch had cleared quality release. Whoever opened the result record that afternoon marked Product Still On Site as Yes and Proportion Already Despatched as None, because nothing on their screen showed otherwise, and Investigation Opened was set to Not required with the result filed as an isolated positive.
A retailer complaint the following week traced back to the same batch code, and the despatch log showed the full batch had shipped two days before the result even arrived. The record was reopened, the hold and withdrawal fields corrected, and an OOS investigation raised retrospectively. The gap was never the laboratory result itself; it was a record completed against an assumption instead of the goods-out log sitting one system away.
The template
The template, field by field
The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.
4 sections
- Reference
- QUA-082
- Archetype
- Record
- Record ID
- MIC-2026-000
- Scoring
- Out of spec rate
- Direction
- Low is good
- Singleton
- Yes
- Basis
- BRCGS cl.5.6
- Links
- Links Sample log, Holds, Trending
- Tags
- Laboratory, Micro
- Sections
- 4
- Fields
- 42
- Follow up fields
- 6
- Repeating sections
- 0
- Links out
- 6
Header
10 fieldsResult ID*
Auto sequence. Format MIC-2026-0000.
The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.
Status*
Drives who this goes to next.
- Planned2 pts
- In progress2 pts
- Complete3 pts
- Deferred0 pts
- Open0 pts
- Closed3 pts
- Overdue0 pts
Date and Time*
Completed By*
Site*
Site ID*
Format SITE-000.
Links to FDN-001 Site ID
Sample ID*
Links to QUA-081 Sample ID
Organism Tested For*
Method Used
When The Result Arrives Decides The Response
A positive arriving before despatch is a hold. The same positive arriving a week after despatch is a withdrawal decision. Record both dates.
The result
9 fieldsResult Value*
Units
Specification Limit*
Within Specification*
- Yes3 pts
- Borderline1 pt
- No0 pts
Result Category*
Satisfactory, borderline, unsatisfactory, or unacceptable and potentially hazardous.
- Satisfactory4 pts
- Borderline2 pts
- Unsatisfactory1 pt
- Unacceptable and potentially hazardous0 pts
Trend Versus Recent Results*
- Improving3 pts
- Stable2 pts
- Worsening0 pts
Date Sample Taken*
Date Result Received*
Days To Result*
Product position
7 fieldsProduct Still On Site*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Proportion Already Despatched*
- None3 pts
- Some1 pt
- All0 pts
Product Consumed Or Past Life
Product Affected By This Result*
- No3 pts
- Yes0 pts
Quantity Affected
Hold ID
Raise the hold record, then enter its reference.
Links to QUA-003 Hold ID
Product Location
Where the affected product physically is right now.
Response
16 fieldsInvestigation Opened*
- Yes3 pts
- Not required3 pts
- No0 pts
OOS Investigation ID
Links to QUA-088 Investigation ID
Withdrawal Considered*
- Not required3 pts
- Considered and rejected2 pts
- Yes0 pts
Authority Notification Required*
- No3 pts
- Yes0 pts
Notification ID
Links to SAF-010 Notification ID
Customer Notified
- Yes3 pts
- Not required3 pts
- No0 pts
Result Trended*
- Yes3 pts
- No0 pts
Feeds Environmental Monitoring Review*
Action Required*
Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.
- No2 pts
- Yes0 pts
Priority
- High0 pts
- Medium1 pt
- Low3 pts
CAPA ID
Format CAPA-2026-00000.
Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID
Action Owner
Quality*
Signature*
Technical Manager*
Second Signature*
QUA-082 · record IDs look like MIC-2026-000 · Links Sample log, Holds, Trending
Open in KnowellaRun it with agents
From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself
The form is the easy part. Checking product position against the despatch log, not memory, and making sure a positive result actually reaches a hold before it reaches a shelf, is the work that actually slips.
Holds the microbiological result record against the sample log and specification limits, and blocks a Not-required investigation answer when the result category says otherwise.
Tracks authority notification and withdrawal decisions arising from an out-of-spec result, so a positive that should reach a regulator or a customer does not stall inside quality review.
Holds the despatch and goods-out record this template depends on, so product position is answered against what actually shipped, not against what the record author assumed.

Coordinates the crew, rolls completion and exceptions into one view, and holds every write for your approval before it touches a record.
This template lives in KnowQuality — quality and food safety. HACCP, nonconformance, traceability, laboratory and customer complaints.
Meet KnowQuality→Glossary
Microbiological Result Record definitions and key terms
- CFU
- Colony forming unit, the standard measure of viable microbial count in a sample, expressed per gram, per swab, or per millilitre depending on the test.
- Total viable count (TVC)
- A general measure of the total microbial load in a sample, used as a hygiene indicator rather than to detect a specific pathogen.
- Enterobacteriaceae
- A family of bacteria used as a process hygiene indicator; a raised count signals a hygiene or process control issue rather than necessarily an unsafe product.
- Out of specification (OOS)
- A result that falls outside its documented limit, triggering an investigation into cause rather than simple retesting until a pass is obtained.
- Withdrawal
- Removing affected product from the supply chain before it reaches the consumer, distinct from a recall which reaches product already in consumers' hands.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions about microbiological result record
What is the microbiological result record template based on?+
It is built against BRCGS cl.5.6, which requires micro results to be checked against a documented limit and a response decided and recorded. Underlying limits for named organisms are set by instruments such as Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005.
What sections does the microbiological result record contain?+
There are four sections: header, the result, product position, and response. Together they hold 42 fields, 29 of which are required.
How many microbiological result records should we have?+
This is a singleton. One record per workspace, set up once and maintained, with each new laboratory result logged against it as a separate entry rather than a fresh template.
Which programme does the microbiological result record belong to?+
It is part of Laboratory and Testing, aimed at producing results you can defend and retesting governed by a protocol written before the retest, not after.
How is a microbiological result record scored?+
Scoring runs on the out of spec rate, where low is good. The score exists to surface a rising rate before it becomes an incident, not to reward filing individual passes.
Can the microbiological result record template be changed?+
Yes. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to the sample log, holds and trending come with it. Most sites install it as it is, run a testing cycle, then tighten the organism list and units to match their product range.
Keep going
Related templates and programmes
Industries this is written for
Programmes this belongs to
Used together in Laboratory and Testing
Maintenance Calibration Record
Records calibration of maintenance instruments such as torque wrenches, pressure gauges and multimeters
Calibration Record
Records the calibration of a piece of test equipment, including standard used, result and next due date
Laboratory Sample Log
Logs every sample taken for testing, with what it is, why it was taken and where it went
Chemical and Compositional Result Record
Records analytical results for composition, additives, contaminants or nutritional claims
Laboratory Method Verification
Verifies that a test method performs as expected in your hands, on your matrix, before results are relied on
Proficiency Testing Record
Records participation in a ring trial or proficiency scheme and how the result compared with the consensus
More in Laboratory
Laboratory Sample Log
Logs every sample taken for testing, with what it is, why it was taken and where it went
Chemical and Compositional Result Record
Records analytical results for composition, additives, contaminants or nutritional claims
Laboratory Method Verification
Verifies that a test method performs as expected in your hands, on your matrix, before results are relied on
Proficiency Testing Record
Records participation in a ring trial or proficiency scheme and how the result compared with the consensus
Laboratory Environmental Check
Checks laboratory conditions that affect results, covering temperature, humidity, cleanliness, segregation and media storage
External Laboratory Approval
Assesses a contract laboratory for accreditation scope, turnaround, reporting and how it handles out of specification results

Written and reviewed by
Siddarth Singh
Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella
Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.
- Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
- MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
- MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
- Six Sigma Black Belt
Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:
- BRCGS — Brand Reputation Compliance Global Standards, cl.5.6
- Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs
- Food Safety Act 1990 and General Food Regulations 2004 (UK)
- US FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) — preventive controls
This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.