Knowella

Microbiological Result Record

A microbiological result arrives as a lab report, not as a fact about the batch: the same positive can mean a routine hold if the product is still on site, or an emergency withdrawal if it has already gone out the door. The recurring failure is answering the product-position fields from memory rather than the despatch log, so a result that is actually out of specification gets the calmer, pre-shipment response it does not deserve.

KnowQualityRecordQUA-082Pinned in navigation42 fields across 4 sectionsFull researchSee the form

Reviewed by Siddarth SinghCSPLast reviewed 16 August 2026

Basis
BRCGS cl.5.6
Workspace
KnowQuality
Form type
Record
Completed by
Quality, when the result arrives
Review trigger
Result marked borderline, unsatisfactory, or unacceptable

The short version

  • A microbiological result record checks one lab result for one organism against a documented specification limit, then routes the response by where the affected product physically sits: on site, partly despatched, or fully shipped.
  • It sits inside the Laboratory and Testing programme, is completed the moment a result arrives, and is reviewed by quality with a technical manager countersignature before it closes.
  • Scoring tracks the out-of-spec rate, and low is good, so the record exists to catch a rising rate before it becomes an incident, not to file individual passes.
  • It links forward into the sample log, product holds, and trending, so a result raised here without those links attached cannot be traced back to the batch or the pattern it belongs to.

What this is

What is a microbiological result record?

What is a microbiological result record?

It is the record that checks one microbiological test result, for one organism, against a documented specification limit, and captures the response where the result is out. It is completed the moment a result arrives from the laboratory, in house or external, and is reviewed by quality with a technical manager countersignature before it closes.

When is a microbiological result record completed?

It is completed at the moment the result arrives, not reconstructed afterwards from memory. The days-to-result field exists precisely to make that turnaround visible, so a result that sat unrecorded for a week cannot be backdated to look routine.

How does this differ from the laboratory sample log?

The sample log records that a sample was taken, what it was, and where it went. This record starts once the laboratory's result for that sample comes back, and it exists specifically to judge that result against a limit and decide what happens next. A sample can sit logged for days with no result record against it yet; the two are sequential, not interchangeable.

Scope

When is a microbiological result record required?

This record judges one micro result against its own limit and decides the immediate response. Sampling itself, verifying the test method, and running the root-cause investigation that follows each belong to a different template.

Use this template when

  • A microbiological test result has come back from the laboratory, in house or external, for a sample already logged
  • The workspace is being set up, or the register needs an entry added or retired
  • You are running the Laboratory and Testing programme and this is one of its steps
  • A linked record needs this one to exist: links sample log, holds, trending
  • A result needs checking against a specification limit before a hold, withdrawal, or authority notification decision is made

Do not use it for

  • Laboratory Sample Log, which logs every sample taken for testing, with what it is, why it was taken and where it went.
  • Chemical and Compositional Result Record, which records analytical results for composition, additives, contaminants or nutritional claims, not microbiology.
  • Laboratory Method Verification, which verifies that a test method performs as expected in your hands, on your matrix, before results are relied on.
  • Out of Specification Investigation, which carries out the root-cause work this record only references by ID.
  • Anything outside KnowQuality, which belongs in the workspace that owns that process

Compliance mapping

Which BRCGS cl.5.6 requirements does this satisfy?

BRCGS cl.5.6 requires micro results to be checked against a documented limit and a response to a failing result decided and recorded. The fields below carry that obligation through the form.

ClauseRequirementWhere it lands
BRCGS cl.5.6The organism tested for, method used and sample it relates to are identified before the result is judgedHeader
BRCGS cl.5.6The result is recorded with its units and checked against a documented specification limitThe result
BRCGS cl.5.6Turnaround from sampling to result is captured to support due-diligence timelinesThe result
BRCGS cl.5.6Where a result is out of specification, the product's physical status is established before a response is decidedProduct position
BRCGS cl.5.6Affected product is quantified and located, and a hold reference raised where the product is affectedProduct position
BRCGS cl.5.6An out-of-specification investigation is opened and referenced, or its absence justifiedResponse
BRCGS cl.5.6Withdrawal is considered and the outcome recorded rather than left silentResponse
BRCGS cl.5.6The result is reviewed and countersigned by a second, more senior signatory before closureResponse

What it does not cover

  • Within Specification, which is marked Borderline or No with no Specification Limit value entered against it.
  • Result Category, which stays marked Satisfactory while Within Specification reads No.
  • Investigation Opened, which is marked Not required for a result recorded as Unsatisfactory or Unacceptable and potentially hazardous.
  • Hold ID, which is left blank while Product Affected By This Result reads Yes.
  • Withdrawal Considered, which is left at Not required without Proportion Already Despatched having been checked first.

Global

Microbiological Result Record requirements by country

BRCGS certification travels with the product, so the instrument that actually gets tested in an audit, a recall, or a court depends on where the affected batch was sold, not where it was made.

United Kingdom

Food Safety Act 1990 and the General Food Regulations 2004

Sets the underlying duty not to place unsafe food on the market, which BRCGS certification is audited evidence against.

The status, hold ID and withdrawal considered fields are what a UK site produces to show a positive result was acted on before, not after, an inspector or a customer asks.

European Union

Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs

Sets the actual organism-by-organism limits, sampling plans and process hygiene criteria that a result like a Listeria or Salmonella finding is checked against.

The organism tested for and specification limit fields exist to show which of this regulation's criteria applied to the sample, not a generic in-house limit invented after the fact.

United States

FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) preventive controls

Governs facilities exporting into the US, where an adulterated finding such as Salmonella or Listeria monocytogenes triggers mandatory corrective action and may require FDA notification.

The authority notification required and notification ID fields are what a BRCGS-certified exporter relies on to show a US-bound positive was escalated, not quietly retested.

How to complete it

How to complete a microbiological result record, step by step

Filling in every field does not make a micro result defensible on its own. Four judgement calls decide whether the response actually matches what happened.

Whether 'still on site' reflects the despatch log, not the moment the result landed

Product Still On Site and Proportion Already Despatched are answered against a snapshot in time. If that snapshot is the moment the result arrived rather than a checked despatch record, a batch that partly left overnight can be recorded as fully on site, and the response follows the wrong assumption from that point on.

Whether a borderline result is treated as a pass or as a trigger

Result Category offers Satisfactory, Borderline, Unsatisfactory, and Unacceptable and potentially hazardous as distinct states, not a pass or fail. Whether a borderline reading opens an investigation or waits for the next sample point is a judgement the record has to carry explicitly, not default silently to no action.

Whether a worsening trend gets treated as one result or a pattern

Trend Versus Recent Results and Feeds Environmental Monitoring Review sit next to each other for a reason. A single worsening reading can be noise; the same reading against a run of prior results is a pattern the environmental monitoring review needs to see, and only a completed record makes that comparison possible.

Whether withdrawal was genuinely considered and rejected, or simply not required

Withdrawal Considered offers Not required, Considered and rejected, and Yes as different states with different evidential weight. Marking Not required for a result that only avoided withdrawal because none of the affected product had shipped is a different position than genuinely never needing to consider it.

What auditors find

Most common microbiological result record findings

These are the patterns that turn up most often when a microbiological result record is reviewed after the fact, rather than at the point the result was first read.

FindingClauseWhat fixes it
Investigation opened marked Not required for a result recorded as Unsatisfactory, with no rationale captured anywhere on the recordBRCGS cl.5.6Block Not required as an answer whenever Result Category reads Unsatisfactory or worse, and require an OOS investigation ID instead.
Proportion Already Despatched recorded as None with no reference to a despatch or goods-out record checked at the timeBRCGS cl.5.6Require the despatch record reference to be entered alongside the answer, not accepted as a standalone statement.
Hold ID left blank despite Product Affected By This Result reading YesBRCGS cl.5.6Make the hold reference mandatory the moment product affected is answered Yes, before the record can move to Response.
Days To Result populated with no target turnaround defined anywhere, so a nine-day result and a same-day result score the sameBRCGS cl.5.6Add a target turnaround per organism and flag any result exceeding it, rather than recording the number with no threshold.
Result Trended marked Yes with no reference to the trending record or chart it draws onBRCGS cl.5.6Require a trending record reference before Result Trended can be marked Yes.
Second Signature applied within minutes of the first, with no evidence the technical manager reviewed anything beyond the status fieldBRCGS cl.5.6Timestamp both signatures separately and query any pair completed inside the same short window for genuine review.

Case in point

Case in point: the positive that was recorded as still on site

A ready-to-eat site received a Listeria monocytogenes detected result four days after a chilled batch had cleared quality release. Whoever opened the result record that afternoon marked Product Still On Site as Yes and Proportion Already Despatched as None, because nothing on their screen showed otherwise, and Investigation Opened was set to Not required with the result filed as an isolated positive.

A retailer complaint the following week traced back to the same batch code, and the despatch log showed the full batch had shipped two days before the result even arrived. The record was reopened, the hold and withdrawal fields corrected, and an OOS investigation raised retrospectively. The gap was never the laboratory result itself; it was a record completed against an assumption instead of the goods-out log sitting one system away.

The template

The template, field by field

The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.

42fields
4 sections
Reference
QUA-082
Archetype
Record
Record ID
MIC-2026-000
Scoring
Out of spec rate
Direction
Low is good
Singleton
Yes
Basis
BRCGS cl.5.6
Links
Links Sample log, Holds, Trending
Tags
Laboratory, Micro
Sections
4
Fields
42
Follow up fields
6
Repeating sections
0
Links out
6
Field typesOwn ID, generated on saveCase thread and parentPick list from a registryLinked to another templateFollow up, dashed outlineScored

Header

10 fields
Text

Result ID*

Generated on save

Auto sequence. Format MIC-2026-0000.

The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.

Single Choice

Status*

Scored

Drives who this goes to next.

  • Planned2 pts
  • In progress2 pts
  • Complete3 pts
  • Deferred0 pts
  • Open0 pts
  • Closed3 pts
  • Overdue0 pts
Date & Time

Date and Time*

Users

Completed By*

Pick List

Site*

From FDN-001 Site NameFilter: Status is Active
Text

Site ID*

Linked

Format SITE-000.

Links to FDN-001 Site ID

Text

Sample ID*

Linked

Links to QUA-081 Sample ID

Single Choice

Organism Tested For*

Listeria monocytogenesListeria speciesSalmonellaE coli O157Total viable countEnterobacteriaceaeStaphylococcus aureusYeast and mould
Text

Method Used

Optional
Info

When The Result Arrives Decides The Response

A positive arriving before despatch is a hold. The same positive arriving a week after despatch is a withdrawal decision. Record both dates.

The result

9 fields
Text

Result Value*

Single Choice

Units

Optional
cfu per gramcfu per swabcfu per millilitreDetected or not detectedPercentMilligrams per kilogramParts per million
Text

Specification Limit*

Single Choice

Within Specification*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Borderline1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Result Category*

Scored

Satisfactory, borderline, unsatisfactory, or unacceptable and potentially hazardous.

  • Satisfactory4 pts
  • Borderline2 pts
  • Unsatisfactory1 pt
  • Unacceptable and potentially hazardous0 pts
Single Choice

Trend Versus Recent Results*

Scored
  • Improving3 pts
  • Stable2 pts
  • Worsening0 pts
Date & Time

Date Sample Taken*

Date & Time

Date Result Received*

Numeric Answer

Days To Result*

Scored

Product position

7 fields
Single Choice

Product Still On Site*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Proportion Already Despatched*

Scored
  • None3 pts
  • Some1 pt
  • All0 pts
Single Choice

Product Consumed Or Past Life

Optional
NoPossiblyYes
Single Choice

Product Affected By This Result*

Scored
  • No3 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Numeric Answer

Quantity Affected

OptionalShows if Product Affected By This Result equals Yes
Text

Hold ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Product Affected By This Result equals Yes

Raise the hold record, then enter its reference.

Links to QUA-003 Hold ID

Text

Product Location

OptionalShows if Product Affected By This Result equals Yes

Where the affected product physically is right now.

Response

16 fields
Single Choice

Investigation Opened*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Not required3 pts
  • No0 pts
Text

OOS Investigation ID

OptionalLinked

Links to QUA-088 Investigation ID

Single Choice

Withdrawal Considered*

Scored
  • Not required3 pts
  • Considered and rejected2 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Authority Notification Required*

Scored
  • No3 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Text

Notification ID

OptionalLinked

Links to SAF-010 Notification ID

Single Choice

Customer Notified

OptionalScored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Not required3 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Result Trended*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Checkbox

Feeds Environmental Monitoring Review*

Single Choice

Action Required*

Scored

Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.

  • No2 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Priority

OptionalScoredShows if Action Required equals Yes
  • High0 pts
  • Medium1 pt
  • Low3 pts
Text

CAPA ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Action Required equals Yes

Format CAPA-2026-00000.

Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID

Users

Action Owner

OptionalShows if Action Required equals Yes
Users

Quality*

Signature

Signature*

Users

Technical Manager*

Signature

Second Signature*

QUA-082 · record IDs look like MIC-2026-000 · Links Sample log, Holds, Trending

Open in Knowella

Run it with agents

From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself

The form is the easy part. Checking product position against the despatch log, not memory, and making sure a positive result actually reaches a hold before it reaches a shelf, is the work that actually slips.

KnowQuality

Holds the microbiological result record against the sample log and specification limits, and blocks a Not-required investigation answer when the result category says otherwise.

KnowSafe

Tracks authority notification and withdrawal decisions arising from an out-of-spec result, so a positive that should reach a regulator or a customer does not stall inside quality review.

KnowLogistics

Holds the despatch and goods-out record this template depends on, so product position is answered against what actually shipped, not against what the record author assumed.

Ella
Ella

Coordinates the crew, rolls completion and exceptions into one view, and holds every write for your approval before it touches a record.

This template lives in KnowQuality — quality and food safety. HACCP, nonconformance, traceability, laboratory and customer complaints.

Meet KnowQuality→

Glossary

Microbiological Result Record definitions and key terms

CFU
Colony forming unit, the standard measure of viable microbial count in a sample, expressed per gram, per swab, or per millilitre depending on the test.
Total viable count (TVC)
A general measure of the total microbial load in a sample, used as a hygiene indicator rather than to detect a specific pathogen.
Enterobacteriaceae
A family of bacteria used as a process hygiene indicator; a raised count signals a hygiene or process control issue rather than necessarily an unsafe product.
Out of specification (OOS)
A result that falls outside its documented limit, triggering an investigation into cause rather than simple retesting until a pass is obtained.
Withdrawal
Removing affected product from the supply chain before it reaches the consumer, distinct from a recall which reaches product already in consumers' hands.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about microbiological result record

What is the microbiological result record template based on?+

It is built against BRCGS cl.5.6, which requires micro results to be checked against a documented limit and a response decided and recorded. Underlying limits for named organisms are set by instruments such as Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005.

What sections does the microbiological result record contain?+

There are four sections: header, the result, product position, and response. Together they hold 42 fields, 29 of which are required.

How many microbiological result records should we have?+

This is a singleton. One record per workspace, set up once and maintained, with each new laboratory result logged against it as a separate entry rather than a fresh template.

Which programme does the microbiological result record belong to?+

It is part of Laboratory and Testing, aimed at producing results you can defend and retesting governed by a protocol written before the retest, not after.

How is a microbiological result record scored?+

Scoring runs on the out of spec rate, where low is good. The score exists to surface a rising rate before it becomes an incident, not to reward filing individual passes.

Can the microbiological result record template be changed?+

Yes. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to the sample log, holds and trending come with it. Most sites install it as it is, run a testing cycle, then tighten the organism list and units to match their product range.

Keep going

Related templates and programmes

Siddarth Singh

Written and reviewed by

Siddarth Singh

Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella

Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.

  • Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
  • MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
  • MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
  • Six Sigma Black Belt
Verify with BCSP →

Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:

  • BRCGS — Brand Reputation Compliance Global Standards, cl.5.6
  • Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs
  • Food Safety Act 1990 and General Food Regulations 2004 (UK)
  • US FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) — preventive controls

This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.

Start in Minutes, Not Weeks

Launch a Ready-Made Template and Customize It Your Way

Every template is fully editable. Adjust fields, workflows, and branding to match your processes, then deploy to your team instantly.