Knowella

External Laboratory Approval

Accreditation is not a blanket guarantee — a laboratory can hold a valid certificate and still not be accredited for the specific test being bought. This assessment exists because a contract laboratory chosen on reputation, price, or a certificate glanced at rather than read, can leave a manufacturer relying on a result nobody would defend if a customer, or a regulator, asked to see the schedule behind it.

KnowQualityAssessmentQUA-08748 fields across 6 sectionsFull researchSee the form

Reviewed by Siddarth SinghCSPLast reviewed 16 August 2026

Basis
ISO 17025 cl.6.6
Workspace
KnowQuality
Form type
Assessment
Completed by
Quality
Review trigger
Before first use, then reviewed yearly or after an incident

The short version

  • The assessment exists because accreditation is scoped to named methods, not blanket coverage — the template forces a check of the actual schedule against the tests being placed, not just the certificate's existence.
  • Out-of-specification notification is scored more heavily than most fields — a phone call scores highest, disclosure only with the report scores zero — because a delayed OOS notification is the failure most likely to reach a customer.
  • The template holds 48 fields across 6 sections, most of them required, and produces a singleton record per approved laboratory that other templates, including the sample log, refer back to.
  • Scoring is approved status, where high is good, but the record also carries a conditional approval state — a laboratory can be added to the approved list with named restrictions rather than a flat yes or no.

What this is

What is an external laboratory approval?

What is an external laboratory approval?

It is a documented assessment carried out before a contract laboratory is used, and reviewed at least yearly, that checks the laboratory's accreditation actually covers the tests being placed with it, along with its turnaround, capacity and how it handles an out-of-specification result. It sits ahead of any sample being sent, not alongside the results that come back.

What does 'accreditation covers named methods' mean in practice?

An accreditation certificate lists a scope, or schedule, of specific methods and matrices the laboratory has been assessed against — it does not cover everything the laboratory offers to run. A test outside that schedule carries none of the assurance the certificate implies, however capable the laboratory actually is.

Why does this assessment cover out-of-specification notification specifically?

A laboratory that only reports a failing result with the routine batch of paperwork, days later, has effectively delayed the manufacturer's own decision to hold or release stock. The assessment exists to fix the notification route before the first sample is ever sent, not after a result arrives late.

Scope

When is an external laboratory approval required?

This is a one-off, then periodically reviewed, approval of a specific laboratory — not a record of an individual sample sent to it or a result it returned. Logging a single test result here instead of the correct result template makes both records harder to find.

Use this template when

  • A contract laboratory is being considered for the first time and needs approval before any sample is sent
  • An approved laboratory's yearly review is due, or a plant change, permit requirement or incident has triggered an early one
  • A complaint or an incident traces back to how an external result was reported or delayed, and the laboratory's arrangements need re-checking
  • You are running the Laboratory and Testing programme and this is the gateway step before sampling begins
  • A supplier approval or sample log record depends on this approval existing and being current

Do not use it for

  • Laboratory Sample Log, which logs every sample taken for testing, with what it is, why it was taken and where it went.
  • Microbiological Result Record, which records a micro result against its specification, with the action taken where it is out.
  • Chemical and Compositional Result Record, which records analytical results for composition, additives, contaminants or nutritional claims.
  • Laboratory Environmental Check, which checks the conditions inside your own laboratory, not a contract laboratory's arrangements.
  • Anything outside KnowQuality, which belongs in the workspace that owns that process

Compliance mapping

Which ISO 17025 cl.6.6 requirements does this satisfy?

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 clause 6.6 covers externally provided products and services, which is where a subcontracted or referral laboratory sits — the clause map below shows where each section of the assessment earns its place.

ClauseRequirementWhere it lands
ISO 17025 cl.6.6.1External providers of products and services affecting laboratory activities are evaluated and selected against defined criteria.Header
ISO 17025 cl.6.6.2The laboratory ensures externally provided testing conforms to its own requirements, and to relevant accreditation criteria where applicable.Accreditation
ISO 17025 cl.6.6.2Ongoing capability of the external provider, including proficiency testing performance, is monitored, not assumed at first approval.Capability
ISO 17025 cl.6.6.3Externally provided products and services are communicated to the provider with clear requirements, including reporting arrangements.Working arrangements
ISO 17025 cl.7.10Nonconforming work, including an out-of-specification result, is subject to a defined policy and procedure.Working arrangements
ISO 17025 cl.6.6.2Records of the evaluation, approval and monitoring of external providers, and any action arising, are retained.Decision
ISO 17025 cl.7.4Handling of test items, including transport and condition on receipt, is controlled where samples move to an external laboratory.Working arrangements

What it does not cover

  • An accreditation certificate checked but its schedule never requested, which leaves the buyer unable to confirm the specific test they need is actually covered.
  • Subcontracting not disclosed by the laboratory, which means a third, unassessed laboratory may be running the work without anyone's knowledge.
  • An out-of-specification result reported only with the routine batch report, which turns a time-critical notification into a delayed piece of paperwork.
  • Proficiency testing performance requested but refused, which removes the one independent check on the laboratory's ongoing competence.
  • Peak capacity assumed rather than confirmed, which is discovered for the first time during the surge that actually needed it.

Global

External Laboratory Approval requirements by country

Where the laboratory is accredited, and by whom, decides how much weight its certificate actually carries — the frameworks below are the ones that matter most in practice.

United Kingdom

UKAS accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025

UKAS publishes each laboratory's accredited schedule, so the 'tests on the schedule' question in this assessment can be checked against a public record rather than taken on trust.

A UK buyer has no excuse for approving a laboratory without checking the published schedule against the tests actually being placed.

United States

A2LA / ANAB accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025

US accreditation bodies issue a comparable scope document, but coverage is more fragmented across multiple accreditors than in the UK.

A US buyer working with more than one contract laboratory should expect to check schedules against more than one accreditation body's format.

International

ILAC mutual recognition arrangement

A laboratory's accreditation is only recognised across ILAC member economies while that accreditation, and its specific scope, remains current.

An export relying on an external laboratory's result should confirm the accreditation covering that test is still active, not just that the laboratory was approved at some point in the past.

How to complete it

How to complete an external laboratory approval, step by step

Every field can be answered without the assessment actually protecting anything. The judgement calls below are what decide whether the approval would hold up if the laboratory's result were ever challenged.

Whether the schedule was actually read, not just requested

'Certificate and schedule obtained: yes' should mean someone checked the named tests against the schedule line by line, not that a document arrived. The 'our tests on the schedule' answer only means something if that reading actually happened first.

How much weight subcontracting disclosure carries

A laboratory that discloses subcontracting honestly is a safer bet than one that scores well on paper but has never been asked. Deciding whether 'declared' subcontracting is acceptable, or triggers approval of the subcontractor too, is a policy call that should be made once and applied to every laboratory, not decided case by case.

What 'conditionally approved' is allowed to mean

A conditional approval needs the condition written into 'conditions of approval' in terms specific enough to check later — a named test excluded, a capacity limit, a requirement to notify by phone. A condition that just repeats 'subject to review' is not a condition; it is a deferred decision.

Whether the yearly review date drives a real re-check or a rubber stamp

The 'next review due' field only protects anything if the review re-tests the schedule, proficiency performance and OOS notification arrangements against current reality, rather than confirming the laboratory is still trading.

What auditors find

Most common external laboratory approval findings

The findings that recur are not laboratories failing outright — they are approvals that stopped checking after the first pass.

FindingClauseWhat fixes it
Certificate obtained but the schedule itself never requested or reviewed.ISO 17025 cl.6.6.2Request the current schedule directly from the accreditation body's public register where available, and confirm every test being placed appears on it by name.
Subcontracting recorded as 'not disclosed' with approval granted anyway.ISO 17025 cl.6.6.2Withhold approval, or make it explicitly conditional, until the laboratory discloses where subcontracted work actually goes and that subcontractor's own standing is checked.
Out-of-specification notification agreed as 'with the report' rather than immediate.ISO 17025 cl.7.10Renegotiate the reporting arrangement before the first sample is sent — same-day notification at minimum, phone contact for anything safety-related.
Proficiency testing performance requested but the laboratory refused to share it.ISO 17025 cl.6.6.2Treat refusal as a material finding against approval, not a neutral non-answer, and record it as a condition or a rejection rather than leaving it blank.
Peak capacity marked 'uncertain' with no follow-up before a seasonal surge.ISO 17025 cl.6.6.3Confirm capacity commitments in writing ahead of the known surge period, and identify a second approved laboratory as contingency if the answer stays uncertain.
Approval reviewed past its due date with no record of why.ISO 17025 cl.6.6.2Treat an overdue review as a lapsed approval for new samples until it is closed, not as a formality to catch up on later.

Case in point

Case in point: the certificate that covered the wrong test

A manufacturer approved a contract laboratory for allergen testing on the strength of a current ISO/IEC 17025 certificate, checked once at onboarding. The certificate was real. The laboratory's accredited scope, when eventually requested two years later during a customer audit, covered a related but different allergen method to the one actually being run against their product.

Every result in between had been reported on the accredited laboratory's letterhead and none of its accredited assurance. The fix was procedural, not technical: request the schedule at approval and at every yearly review, and match it against the test being placed by name, not by category.

The template

The template, field by field

The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.

48fields
6 sections
Reference
QUA-087
Archetype
Assessment
Record ID
ELA-2026-000
Scoring
Approved status
Direction
High is good
Singleton
Yes
Basis
ISO 17025 cl.6.6
Links
Links Supplier approval, Sample log
Tags
Laboratory, Supplier
Sections
6
Fields
48
Follow up fields
3
Repeating sections
0
Links out
3
Field typesOwn ID, generated on saveCase thread and parentPick list from a registryLinked to another templateFollow up, dashed outlineScored

Header

12 fields
Text

Assessment ID*

Generated on save

Auto sequence. Format ELA-2026-000.

The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.

Single Choice

Status*

Scored

Drives who this goes to next.

  • Planned2 pts
  • In progress2 pts
  • Complete3 pts
  • Deferred0 pts
  • Open0 pts
  • Closed3 pts
  • Overdue0 pts
Date & Time

Date and Time*

Users

Completed By*

Pick List

Site*

From FDN-001 Site NameFilter: Status is Active
Text

Site ID*

Linked

Format SITE-000.

Links to FDN-001 Site ID

Pick List

Laboratory*

From FDN-005 Vendor NameFilter: Status is Approved
Text

Vendor ID*

Linked

Format VEN-0000.

Links to FDN-005 Vendor ID

Info

Accreditation Covers Named Methods

A laboratory holding accreditation is not accredited for everything it offers. Ask for the schedule and check the specific test you are buying is on it.

Single Choice

Assessment Trigger*

ComplaintPermit requirementPlant changePeriodicNew installationAfter an incident
Users

Assessed By*

Multi Choice

Tests To Be Placed*

MicrobiologicalChemicalAllergenNutritionalWaterAuthenticity

Accreditation

6 fields
Single Choice

Accreditation Held*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Applied for1 pt
  • No0 pts
Text

Accreditation Body

Optional
Single Choice

Certificate And Schedule Obtained*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Certificate only1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Our Tests On The Schedule*

Scored
  • All3 pts
  • Some1 pt
  • None0 pts
Single Choice

Methods Match Our Requirement*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Equivalent2 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Subcontracting Declared*

Scored

Many laboratories subcontract the tests they do not run. Ask where the work actually goes.

  • No subcontracting3 pts
  • Declared2 pts
  • Not disclosed0 pts

Capability

6 fields
Single Choice

Proficiency Scheme Participation*

Scored
  • Yes, all our tests3 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • None0 pts
Single Choice

Recent Proficiency Performance Shared*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Refused0 pts
Single Choice

Limit Of Detection Meets Our Need*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Marginal1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Turnaround Time Committed*

Scored
  • Yes, contractual3 pts
  • Indicative1 pt
  • None0 pts
Single Choice

Capacity At Peak Confirmed*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Uncertain1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Emergency Or Weekend Testing Available*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Limited1 pt
  • No0 pts

Working arrangements

6 fields
Single Choice

Sample Transport Arrangements Suitable*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Marginal1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Sample Rejection Criteria Understood*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Result Reporting Format Agreed*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Out Of Specification Notified Immediately*

Scored

A positive pathogen result sitting in an inbox over a weekend is the failure that becomes a recall.

  • Yes, by phone4 pts
  • Same day email2 pts
  • With the report0 pts
Single Choice

Escalation Contact Out Of Hours*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Data Retention Agreed*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts

Decision

5 fields
Single Choice

Laboratory Approved*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Conditionally1 pt
  • No0 pts
Text

Tests Approved For

Optional
Text

Conditions Of Approval

Optional
Single Choice

Added To Approved Supplier List*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Date & Time

Next Review Due*

Result

13 fields
Numeric Answer

Items Assessed*

Excludes anything marked N/A.

Numeric Answer

Items Failed*

Numeric Answer

Score Percent*

Scored

Calculated on submission. High is good. N/A items leave the denominator.

Single Choice

Result Band*

Scored
  • Pass3 pts
  • Caution1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
Numeric Answer

Completeness Percent*

How much of the template was actually answered. A high score on a half completed form is not a high score.

Single Choice

Action Required*

Scored

Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.

  • No2 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Priority

OptionalScoredShows if Action Required equals Yes
  • High0 pts
  • Medium1 pt
  • Low3 pts
Text

CAPA ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Action Required equals Yes

Format CAPA-2026-00000.

Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID

Users

Action Owner

OptionalShows if Action Required equals Yes
Users

Technical Manager*

Signature

Signature*

Users

Quality Manager*

Signature

Second Signature*

QUA-087 · record IDs look like ELA-2026-000 · Links Supplier approval, Sample log

Open in Knowella

Run it with agents

From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself

The form is the easy part. Checking a schedule actually covers the test being placed, and catching a review that has quietly gone overdue, is the work that actually slips.

KnowQuality

Holds the external laboratory approval against the supplier register, flags a yearly review before it lapses, and keeps the schedule check linked to the sample log entries it protects.

KnowContractor

Treats the contract laboratory as a managed external provider alongside other contractors, so an approval condition or a capacity gap surfaces in the same place as the rest of your third-party risk.

KnowLogistics

Picks up the sample transport and turnaround commitments recorded here, so a laboratory that misses its committed turnaround shows up as a logistics exception, not just a quality note.

Ella
Ella

Coordinates the crew across quality, contractor and logistics views, rolls approval status and exceptions into one place, and holds every write for your approval before it touches a record.

This template lives in KnowQuality — quality and food safety. HACCP, nonconformance, traceability, laboratory and customer complaints.

Meet KnowQuality→

Glossary

External Laboratory Approval definitions and key terms

Accreditation schedule
The specific list of methods, matrices and parameters an accreditation body has assessed a laboratory for; the certificate confirms accreditation exists, the schedule confirms what it actually covers.
Subcontracting (laboratory)
Work a laboratory places with a third, often unnamed, laboratory rather than performing itself; undisclosed subcontracting means the buyer's approval never reached the laboratory actually doing the work.
Proficiency testing
An external scheme that sends a laboratory blind samples to check its results against a known reference, used here as evidence of ongoing competence rather than a one-off assessment.
Out-of-specification result
A test result falling outside the agreed acceptance criteria; how and when the laboratory notifies this result is treated as part of its approval, not just its technical output.
Limit of detection
The lowest concentration or level a method can reliably distinguish from zero; a laboratory's limit of detection must meet the buyer's own specification, not just be technically non-zero.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about external laboratory approval

What is the external laboratory approval template based on?+

It is built against ISO/IEC 17025:2017 clause 6.6, which covers externally provided products and services — the category a subcontracted or referral testing laboratory falls into.

How is this different from checking a laboratory's accreditation certificate?+

A certificate confirms accreditation exists; this assessment additionally checks the schedule behind it, the laboratory's turnaround and capacity, and how it notifies an out-of-specification result — none of which a certificate alone tells you.

Why is this assessment a singleton per laboratory?+

It records the standing approval status of one contract laboratory, reviewed yearly, rather than one instance per sample sent. The sample log and supplier approval both refer back to this record rather than repeating the same checks.

What does a 'conditional' approval actually allow?+

It allows the laboratory to be used for specifically named tests, or under stated restrictions, recorded in the conditions of approval field, rather than either a blanket yes or a full rejection.

Does subcontracting automatically fail an approval?+

No, but undisclosed subcontracting scores at the bottom of its field for a reason — declared subcontracting can be an acceptable, managed risk, while undisclosed subcontracting removes the buyer's ability to assess who is actually doing the work.

Can the template be adjusted for a specific category of testing?+

Yes. Every field, option and scoring weight is editable, and the tests-to-be-placed list can be extended for categories, such as authenticity or water testing, that a given site relies on more heavily.

Keep going

Related templates and programmes

Siddarth Singh

Written and reviewed by

Siddarth Singh

Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella

Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.

  • Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
  • MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
  • MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
  • Six Sigma Black Belt
Verify with BCSP →

Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:

  • ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — Clause 6.6, Externally provided products and services
  • ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — Clause 7.10, Nonconforming work
  • UKAS — accredited laboratory schedules and public register
  • ILAC — International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation, mutual recognition arrangement

This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.

Start in Minutes, Not Weeks

Launch a Ready-Made Template and Customize It Your Way

Every template is fully editable. Adjust fields, workflows, and branding to match your processes, then deploy to your team instantly.