Knowella

Personal Air Sampling Record

A personal air sampling record captures what one worker actually breathed over a shift, not what the room contained. Its recurring failure is not the laboratory result but the conditions around it: a quiet sampling day, a mask worn during sampling that should have been off, or a partial shift extrapolated without saying so, each producing a number that clears the worker on paper while telling nobody anything true about a normal day.

KnowHealthRecordHLT-003Pinned in navigation53 fields across 5 sectionsFull researchSee the form

Reviewed by Siddarth SinghCSPLast reviewed 16 August 2026

Basis
OSHA 1910.1000, ACGIH TLV
Workspace
KnowHealth
Form type
Record
Completed by
A trained sampler with a calibrated pump, on a shift representative of normal work
Feeds
Exposure result review, exposure control plan, health surveillance

The short version

  • Personal sampling measures what the individual breathed, not what the room contained, and the result is only meaningful if the sampled day represents normal work, production and controls.
  • OSHA 1910.1000 sets enforceable permissible exposure limits, but ACGIH's threshold limit values are frequently stricter and are what most hygienists actually assess against, so a compliant PEL result can still exceed the TLV.
  • Sampling is normally done outside the respirator, because the record is meant to establish exposure before protection, not the exposure the worker happened to receive that day with a mask on.
  • A result is only as good as the sampling train behind it: pump flow calibrated within tolerance, a field blank submitted, and a stated basis for any extrapolation from a partial shift.
  • The worker has a right to be told the result, in language they understand, and that step is a documented finding in its own right, not an administrative afterthought once the number is filed.

What this is

What is a personal air sampling record?

What is a personal air sampling record?

A personal air sampling record documents a sample collected from a worker's breathing zone over a defined period, usually a shift, and the result compared against the relevant occupational exposure limit. It exists to answer one question: what did this person actually breathe.

How is personal sampling different from area monitoring?

Personal sampling places the media on the worker, in the breathing zone, so the result represents that individual's exposure. Area monitoring is taken at a fixed point and tells you about the location, not the person. The two are complementary and neither substitutes for the other.

Why does the sampled day matter as much as the result?

The number only means something if the day it came from was normal. A low result from a low-production day, or one with unusual conditions, does not demonstrate that a normal shift is safe; it demonstrates that a quiet shift was.

Scope

When is a personal air sampling record required?

Personal sampling measures an individual's exposure directly. It is not the tool for deciding whether monitoring is needed, and it does not stand in for the location-level check area monitoring provides.

Use this template when

  • A worker's exposure to an airborne agent needs quantifying against a permissible exposure limit or threshold limit value
  • A similar exposure group has been identified and a monitoring plan calls for a representative worker to be sampled
  • A qualitative exposure assessment has flagged a task as a candidate for monitoring and now needs a measured result
  • A control change, process change or complaint requires evidence of the actual exposure a worker experiences
  • A periodic re-sample is due under the surveillance programme for a substance already known to be present

Do not use it for

  • Area Monitoring Record, which is taken at a fixed point in the workplace and tells you about the location rather than any individual's exposure
  • Similar Exposure Group Register, which groups workers by task and agent and is where the monitoring plan is built before any sampling happens
  • Qualitative Exposure Assessment, which forms the professional judgement of likely exposure that decides whether sampling is warranted at all
  • Noise Dosimetry Record, which uses a dosimeter and a different exposure metric even though it is also worn on the person
  • Exposure Result Review, which interprets a completed sample's result against the trend and turns it into a decision

Compliance mapping

Which OSHA 1910.1000 requirements does this satisfy?

Neither OSHA nor ACGIH prescribes a single sampling form, but both are prescriptive about the concentration a result is judged against.

ClauseRequirementWhere it lands
OSHA 1910.1000(a)Permissible exposure limits set the concentration a sample result is compared against, by substanceResult
OSHA 1910.1000(e)Administrative and engineering controls considered and implemented where feasible before reliance on respiratory protectionFollow up
ACGIH TLV IntroductionThe time-weighted average is an eight-hour figure; a sample covering a different period must be normalised on a stated basisResult
ACGIH TLV Introduction, sampling strategyA sample is expected to represent the worker's exposure on a normal working day, not an atypical oneSampling conditions
NIOSH Manual of Analytical MethodsMethod-specific media, flow rate and calibration tolerance for the analyte sampledEquipment and method
OSHA 1910.1020(c)Employee exposure records, including sample data, retained and accessible to the exposed employeeFollow up
OSHA 1910.1020(g)The employee, or their representative, informed of monitoring resultsFollow up

What it does not cover

  • Area Monitoring Record, which is taken at a fixed point and characterises the location, not any individual's breathing zone.
  • Similar Exposure Group Register, which groups workers by shared task and agent and is where the monitoring plan itself is built.
  • Qualitative Exposure Assessment, the professional judgement made before any sampling occurs, deciding whether it is warranted.
  • Exposure Control Plan, where a result approaching or exceeding the limit is turned into an engineering or administrative response.
  • Noise Dosimetry Record, which quantifies a different hazard against a different metric even though also worn on the person.

Global

Personal Air Sampling Record requirements by country

The duty to keep exposure below a limit is close to universal. What differs is which figure is the legal limit, how prescriptive the sampling method must be, and who has a right to the result.

United States

OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1000, Table Z-1

Permissible exposure limits are the enforceable figure; ACGIH TLVs are a widely used reference but not federal law.

A result that clears the PEL can still exceed the TLV, and many corporate hygiene programmes hold to the stricter figure regardless of what is enforceable.

United Kingdom

COSHH Regulations 2002, reg.10; HSE EH40 Workplace Exposure Limits

Workplace exposure limits are set nationally, and personal sampling is the method HSE guidance expects for demonstrating compliance.

HSE's MDHS methods prescribe sampling technique in more detail than OSHA does, and departing from the specified method needs justifying.

International

ACGIH Threshold Limit Values

Not law by default anywhere, but adopted by reference into many national regulations and multinational exposure programmes.

Where a site operates across jurisdictions, the TLV is often the figure actually managed to, because it travels with the company rather than the site.

How to complete it

How to complete a personal air sampling record, step by step

The form captures a number. Whether it is defensible depends on four judgement calls the template prompts for but cannot make on its own.

Judge representativeness before you judge the result

Production rate, unusual conditions and whether the task was performed as normal determine whether the sample means anything. A correct result from an atypical day is not evidence about a normal one; treating it as such is the most common way a defensible-looking record is wrong.

Sample outside the respirator unless the question is different

The default purpose of personal sampling is to establish exposure before protection, meaning outside the facepiece. Sampling inside understates that, and the two should never be conflated without the record saying explicitly which was done and why.

Extrapolate a partial shift with a stated assumption, not silently

A sample covering less than the full shift has to become an eight-hour figure, and the assumption about the unsampled period is where a defensible extrapolation and an optimistic one diverge. State it, rather than letting the number reach the TWA field with no visible working.

Treat a failed calibration or missing blank as invalidated data

A flow deviation outside tolerance or an absent field blank does not produce a slightly less certain result; it produces a result nobody can rely on. Say the sample was voided and resampled, rather than carrying the number forward with a caveat nobody reads.

What auditors find

Most common personal air sampling record findings

Findings rarely concern whether the paperwork exists. They concern whether the number can be trusted and whether anyone acted on it.

FindingClauseWhat fixes it
Sample taken on an atypical production day, not flagged before closing out the exposure question.ACGIH TLV Introduction, sampling strategyRecord production rate and unusual conditions honestly; treat an atypical result as indicative pending a resample.
Pump flow deviation exceeded tolerance but the result was still reported as valid.NIOSH Manual of Analytical MethodsVoid and resample whenever pre- and post-calibration flows differ by more than the stated tolerance.
Worker sampled inside the respirator, understating the exposure the record is meant to establish.OSHA 1910.1000(a)Sample outside the facepiece by default; record explicitly if an inside-mask sample was intentional.
Partial-shift sample reported as an eight-hour TWA with no extrapolation basis stated.ACGIH TLV IntroductionState the assumption used to extrapolate, or report the figure as partial and unextrapolated.
No field blank submitted, so contamination cannot be distinguished from a genuine low result.NIOSH Manual of Analytical MethodsSubmit a field blank with every batch and use it to correct or void the result.
Worker never informed of the result, or informed without an explanation in plain language.OSHA 1910.1020(g)Record that the result was communicated and explained, not merely filed once received.

Case in point

Case in point: the result that was correct for a day that never came back

A meat processing site ran personal ammonia sampling for a cutting room worker as part of its annual cycle. The sample was taken outside the respirator, calibration was within tolerance, and the result came back a fraction of both the PEL and the TLV. The record was filed as compliant and the exposure question closed for the year.

The sampled shift had run at reduced output for scheduled maintenance, and the Production Rate field read Below normal. Nobody used that field to qualify the result before sign-off; the annual review treated the low number as proof the exposure was controlled. Weeks later, on a normal shift, a worker in the same role reported respiratory symptoms, and the resample came back markedly higher. The representativeness fields had recorded exactly the condition that made the first result unreliable; the process around the form had never been built to act on them.

The template

The template, field by field

The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.

53fields
5 sections
Reference
HLT-003
Archetype
Record
Record ID
EXP-2026-000
Scoring
Result against OEL
Direction
High is bad
Singleton
No
Basis
OSHA 1910.1000, ACGIH TLV
Links
Links Worker, SEG, Substance
Tags
Hygiene, Monitoring
Sections
5
Fields
53
Follow up fields
3
Repeating sections
0
Links out
5
Field typesOwn ID, generated on saveCase thread and parentPick list from a registryLinked to another templateFollow up, dashed outlineScored

Header

11 fields
Text

Sample ID*

Generated on save

Auto sequence. Format PAS-2026-000.

The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.

Single Choice

Status*

Scored

Drives who this goes to next.

  • Planned2 pts
  • In progress2 pts
  • Complete3 pts
  • Deferred0 pts
  • Open0 pts
  • Closed3 pts
  • Overdue0 pts
Date & Time

Date and Time*

Users

Completed By*

Pick List

Site*

From FDN-001 Site NameFilter: Status is Active
Text

Site ID*

Linked

Format SITE-000.

Links to FDN-001 Site ID

Pick List

Worker*

From FDN-003 Worker NameFilter: Site matches, Status is Active
Text

Person ID*

Linked

Format PER-0000.

Links to FDN-003 Person ID

Text

SEG Reference

OptionalLinked

Links to HLT-001 Group Reference

Single Choice

Agent Sampled*

Respirable dustInhalable dustAmmoniaChlorinePeracetic acidCaustic mistEndotoxin
Single Choice

Sampling Standard

Optional
NIOSHOSHAMDHSISO

Sampling conditions

10 fields
Info

Sample A Normal Day

A sample taken on a quiet shift understates exposure. Record the conditions honestly so the result can be interpreted, and note anything that made the day unrepresentative.

Text

Task Performed*

Single Choice

Area*

Cutting roomBoning hallPackingChill storeFreezerPasteurisingFillingCulture roomDespatchYardWorkshopPlant roomOffices
Single Choice

Shift*

DayAfternoonNight
Single Choice

Representative Of Normal Work*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Production Rate

OptionalScored
  • Above normal1 pt
  • Normal3 pts
  • Below normal1 pt
Text

Unusual Conditions

Optional
Single Choice

Ventilation Operating Normally*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Controls In Use During Sample*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Worker Wearing RPE*

Scored

Sampling is normally done outside the respirator to measure exposure before protection.

  • Yes, sampled outside3 pts
  • Yes, sampled inside1 pt
  • No RPE2 pts

Equipment and method

11 fields
Text

Pump Reference*

Numeric Answer

Pre Calibration Flow*

Numeric Answer

Post Calibration Flow*

Numeric Answer

Flow Deviation Percent*

Scored

Above five percent deviation usually invalidates the sample.

Single Choice

Media Type*

Filter cassetteSorbent tubePassive badgeImpinger
Single Choice

Blank Submitted*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Date & Time

Sample Start*

Date & Time

Sample End*

Numeric Answer

Sample Duration Minutes*

Scored
Single Choice

Covers Full Shift*

Scored

Partial shift samples must be extrapolated with a stated assumption about the unsampled period.

  • Yes3 pts
  • Partial, extrapolated1 pt
  • Partial, not extrapolated0 pts
Single Choice

Chain Of Custody Maintained*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts

Result

12 fields
Single Choice

Laboratory*

In houseExternal accreditedCustomer nominated
Single Choice

Laboratory Accredited*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Text

Analysis Method

Optional
Numeric Answer

Result*

Scored
Single Choice

Units*

Milligrams per cubic metreParts per millionFibres per cubic centimetreMicrograms per cubic metrePercentOther
Numeric Answer

Limit Of Detection

Optional
Numeric Answer

Eight Hour TWA*

Scored
Numeric Answer

Exposure Limit*

Numeric Answer

Percent Of Limit*

Scored
Single Choice

Short Term Exposure Measured

OptionalScored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Not applicable3 pts
  • No1 pt
Numeric Answer

STEL Result

Optional
Single Choice

Exceeds Any Limit*

Scored
  • No3 pts
  • Approaching1 pt
  • Yes0 pts

Follow up

9 fields
Single Choice

Worker Informed Of Result*

Scored

A legal requirement in most jurisdictions, and the right thing to do regardless.

  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Result Explained In Plain Language*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Text

Review ID

OptionalLinked

Links to HLT-007 Review ID

Single Choice

Action Required*

Scored

Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.

  • No2 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Priority

OptionalScoredShows if Action Required equals Yes
  • High0 pts
  • Medium1 pt
  • Low3 pts
Text

CAPA ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Action Required equals Yes

Format CAPA-2026-00000.

Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID

Users

Action Owner

OptionalShows if Action Required equals Yes
Users

Occupational Hygienist*

Signature

Signature*

HLT-003 · record IDs look like EXP-2026-000 · Links Worker, SEG, Substance

Open in Knowella

Run it with agents

From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself

The sample is a single event. What determines whether it means anything is whether the day was representative, the equipment was within tolerance, and the result reached the worker and the control decision it informs.

KnowHealth

Holds the sampling record against the exposure group it belongs to, flags results approaching the limit, and keeps calibration and blank evidence attached to the sample.

KnowSafe

Turns a result exceeding the limit into a linked action against the control decision, rather than leaving the exceedance sitting on a closed record.

KnowComply

Tracks which exposure records have been communicated to the worker and which remain outstanding, against the recordkeeping duty that requires it.

Ella
Ella

Watches production rate and unusual-conditions fields for atypical sampling days and flags the result as indicative before it becomes a closed finding.

This template lives in KnowHealth — employee wellbeing. Exposure monitoring, health surveillance, case management and return to work.

Meet KnowHealth→

Glossary

Personal Air Sampling Record definitions and key terms

Breathing zone
The hemisphere around the nose and mouth from which a person draws breath; personal sampling places the media there to represent actual inhaled exposure.
Time-weighted average (TWA)
An exposure figure averaged over a stated period, usually eight hours, against which most exposure limits are set.
Occupational exposure limit (OEL)
The general term for the concentration below which most workers can be exposed without adverse effect, expressed as a PEL, TLV or WEL depending on jurisdiction.
Field blank
Sampling media handled identically to the exposed sample but not exposed to air, used to detect contamination from handling rather than the atmosphere.
Flow calibration
Verifying the sampling pump's flow rate before and after the sample period, since the result depends on the volume of air drawn as much as on the mass collected.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about personal air sampling record

Does personal air sampling replace a qualitative exposure assessment?+

No. The qualitative assessment decides whether sampling is warranted, using task knowledge and existing data. Sampling answers the question the assessment raises.

What counts as a representative sampling day?+

Normal production rate, the task performed as usual, and no unusual conditions noted. A day with reduced output or an unusual method does not produce a representative result.

Should the sample be taken inside or outside the respirator?+

Outside, by default. Personal sampling normally establishes exposure before protection, so the control decision reflects what the workplace produces, not how well a respirator performed.

What happens when the pump's flow rate drifts during the shift?+

If pre- and post-calibration flows differ by more than the method's stated tolerance, commonly five percent, the sample should be invalidated and resampled, not reported with the drift as a caveat.

How is a partial-shift sample turned into an eight-hour TWA?+

By extrapolating with a stated assumption about the unsampled period, typically that exposure there matched the monitored period. Record the assumption; a reviewer will question it if the result is close to the limit.

Who has to be told the result?+

The worker who was sampled, in language they understand, and the record should show it happened. OSHA's recordkeeping duty extends to giving employees access to their own exposure data.

Keep going

Related templates and programmes

Siddarth Singh

Written and reviewed by

Siddarth Singh

Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella

Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.

  • Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
  • MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
  • MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
  • Six Sigma Black Belt
Verify with BCSP →

Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:

  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1000, Table Z-1, Air Contaminants
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1020, Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records
  • ACGIH Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices
  • NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM)
  • HSE EH40/2005, Workplace Exposure Limits

This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.

Start in Minutes, Not Weeks

Launch a Ready-Made Template and Customize It Your Way

Every template is fully editable. Adjust fields, workflows, and branding to match your processes, then deploy to your team instantly.