What this is
What is a data breach record?
What is a data breach record?
It documents the loss, exposure or unauthorised access to personal data from discovery: what happened, who is affected, whether harm meets the notification threshold, and what was notified to the regulator and individuals. It stays open until containment, assessment and notification are complete.
What counts as a personal data breach?
Any incident compromising the confidentiality, integrity or availability of personal data: device loss, a misdirected message, unauthorised access, system compromise or improper disposal. No external attacker is required; a message sent to the wrong recipient is a breach in the same sense as a compromise.
Does every breach have to be notified?
No. Notification depends on an assessed risk to individuals, not the fact of the breach. A device confirmed encrypted, with no evidence of access, may not meet the threshold; the same device lost unencrypted, holding health data, almost certainly will. The assessment decides that, before the deadline forces a default answer.
Scope
When is a data breach record required?
This record is one step in a larger programme. Using it for work that belongs to a neighbouring template produces records that are hard to report on later.
Use this template when
- A loss, exposure or unauthorised access to personal data has been discovered, or is suspected and needs recording while investigated
- The workspace is being set up, or the register needs an entry added or retired
- You are running the Data Protection and Information Security programme and this is one step
- A linked record needs this one to exist: links security incidents, notification
- A notification decision, made or not, needs to be defensible afterwards rather than reconstructed from memory
Do not use it for
- Personal Data Processing Record, the register of what personal data is held, why, on what basis and for how long, which a breach assessment checks against.
- Data Protection Impact Assessment, which assesses privacy impact before a new system is introduced, not after something has gone wrong.
- Subject Access Request Record, an individual's request for their own data, a different duty with a different clock and no harm assessment.
- Cyber Incident Record, the technical response where the breach originates in a system compromise; this record is the privacy-facing companion, not a replacement.
- Anything outside KnowComply, which belongs in the workspace that owns that process
Compliance mapping
Which ISO 27701 cl.6.13 requirements does this satisfy?
ISO 27701 places breach response inside the same incident management discipline as any security incident, while GDPR attaches a short clock to the outcome. The record has to satisfy both: the requirement to respond and learn, and the statutory duty to notify within a fixed window where the threshold is met.
| Clause | Requirement | Where it lands |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 27701 cl.6.13 | Personal data breaches identified and responded to through the same incident management process as any security incident | Header |
| ISO 27701 cl.6.13 | Immediate action taken to contain the incident and prevent further loss once discovered | Containment |
| ISO 27701 cl.6.13 | Likelihood and severity of harm assessed, including special category data and vulnerable individuals, before any notification decision | Assessment |
| GDPR Art.33 | Breach notified to the supervisory authority without undue delay and, where feasible, within 72 hours of becoming aware, unless unlikely to risk individuals | Notification |
| GDPR Art.34 | Affected individuals communicated with directly, without undue delay, where the breach is likely to result in a high risk to their rights | Notification |
| ISO 27001 cl.10.2 | Nonconformity addressed with a root cause and corrective action that prevents recurrence, not only the immediate fix | Outcome |
| ISO 27701 cl.6.13 | Evidence of the incident, assessment and resolution retained in a form that can be produced afterwards | Outcome |
What it does not cover
- Personal Data Processing Record, which the breach record is checked against to establish what data and processing activities were actually affected.
- Cyber Incident Record, which holds the technical response, forensics and system recovery where the breach originated in a system compromise.
- Data Protection Impact Assessment, a preventive instrument completed before a system is introduced, not a substitute for assessing harm after a breach.
- Subject Access Request Record, which handles an individual's request for their own data, not an incident affecting it.
- The regulator's own investigation, which this record supports with evidence but does not stand in for; a completed record is not proof of compliance.
Global
Data Breach Record requirements by country
The duty to assess harm is close to universal. What differs sharply between regimes is whether a notification clock exists at all, how short it is, and who bears the burden of showing the threshold was not met.
State breach notification statutes (all 50 states); HIPAA Breach Notification Rule for health data
No single federal breach law; timing and thresholds vary by state and sector, with health data under a separate federal clock.
A multi-state breach can trigger several deadlines from one incident, so the record needs a per-jurisdiction analysis, not one generic answer.
UK GDPR Art.33-34; Data Protection Act 2018 s.67-68
Notification to the ICO required without undue delay and within 72 hours where feasible, unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk.
The ICO measures the 72-hour figure from awareness of the incident, not from when the investigation confirms it was a breach.
EU GDPR Art.33-34
The 72-hour standard most non-EU breach regimes have converged on, whether or not the organisation is itself subject to GDPR.
Even outside the EU's direct reach an organisation tends to be judged by customers and auditors against the GDPR clock, since it is the practical benchmark.
How to complete it
How to complete a data breach record, step by step
The template captures discovery, containment, assessment and notification as separate sections. What decides whether the record is defensible afterwards is judgement the fields alone do not enforce.
The harm-assessment fields are separate from Notification Required for a reason: the decision should follow a completed assessment, not run alongside one still incomplete. Notification filled in first is a decision without the reasoning that produced it.
Health and biometric categories change what 'likely to result in a risk' means. A misdirected email of contact details and one of health data are not the same severity, even with the same mechanism, and the record should show that reasoning.
Notification Required answered No is a legitimate outcome, but only if reasoned. A regulator reviewing the record checks whether the threshold was actually assessed against the facts, not merely whether a conclusion was recorded.
Containment stops the breach; Root Cause Identified stops it recurring. A breach closed with root cause left as Probable or No resolved the incident and left the underlying weakness in place.
What auditors find
Most common data breach record findings
The findings below concern whether the record shows a reasoned sequence from discovery to notification, or fields completed after the fact to match a decision already made.
| Finding | Clause | What fixes it |
|---|---|---|
| Notification decision recorded before the harm assessment fields are complete. | GDPR Art.33 | Sequence the workflow so both assessment fields are required before Notification Required can be answered. |
| Special Category Data Involved marked Yes with no visible change to the reasoning. | ISO 27701 cl.6.13 | Require a short justification wherever special category data is involved and the threshold is still not met. |
| Regulator or individuals notified late, with no explanation retained. | GDPR Art.33 | Capture the reason for a late notification at the time; a bare No does not show whether the delay was reasonable. |
| Root Cause Identified left as Probable or No on a closed breach. | ISO 27001 cl.10.2 | Do not allow Breach Closed to be Yes while root cause is anything other than Yes, without an explicit exception. |
| Evidence Preserved marked Partly or No with nothing recorded about what was lost. | ISO 27701 cl.6.13 | Require a note on what evidence could not be preserved and why; it affects the assessment and any investigation. |
| Vulnerable Individuals Considered answered without evidence the population was reviewed. | ISO 27701 cl.6.13 | Name who was checked for vulnerability factors, such as age or health status, rather than a default Yes. |
Case in point
Case in point: the breach that was contained fast and notified slow
A payroll error sent a spreadsheet with salary and bank details to the wrong internal list. The sender recalled it within the hour and confirmed with IT that no recipient appeared to have opened it. Breach Contained and Further Loss Prevented were both recorded Yes the same day, and the incident looked closed within 24 hours.
The assessment took three weeks: nobody had confirmed the recall succeeded on every device, some running mobile clients that do not honour recalls, and the privacy lead would not sign off Likelihood Of Harm Assessed without that check. Once two recipients were confirmed to have opened it first, the 72-hour window had long passed. The delay was a careful assessment outrunning the clock, not concealment, and the record had to show that, because an unexplained late notification reads identically to one simply forgotten.
The template
The template, field by field
The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.
5 sections
- Reference
- CMP-033
- Archetype
- Record
- Record ID
- DBR-2026-000
- Scoring
- Breaches notified on time
- Direction
- High is good
- Singleton
- Yes
- Basis
- ISO 27701 cl.6.13
- Links
- Links Security incidents, Notification
- Tags
- Privacy, Breach
- Sections
- 5
- Fields
- 45
- Follow up fields
- 3
- Repeating sections
- 0
- Links out
- 3
Header
13 fieldsRecord ID*
Auto sequence. Format DBR-2026-000.
The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.
Status*
Drives who this goes to next.
- Planned2 pts
- In progress2 pts
- Complete3 pts
- Deferred0 pts
- Open0 pts
- Closed3 pts
- Overdue0 pts
Date and Time*
Completed By*
Site*
Site ID*
Format SITE-000.
Links to FDN-001 Site ID
Discovered*
Discovered By*
Breach Type*
Data Categories Involved*
Individuals Affected
Special Category Data Involved*
- No3 pts
- Yes0 pts
Deadlines Measured In Hours
Notification windows for personal data breaches are short and start when you become aware, not when you finish investigating.
Containment
6 fieldsBreach Contained*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Further Loss Prevented*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Systems Secured*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Data Recovered Where Possible*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Evidence Preserved*
- Yes2 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Privacy Lead Informed Immediately*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Assessment
6 fieldsLikelihood Of Harm Assessed*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Severity Of Harm Assessed*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Vulnerable Individuals Considered*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Health Data Exposure Considered*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Notification Threshold Assessed*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Legal Advice Taken Where Needed*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Notification
6 fieldsRegulator Notified Where Required*
- Yes3 pts
- Not required3 pts
- No0 pts
Notified Within The Deadline*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Individuals Notified Where Required*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Notification Content Adequate*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Customers Or Partners Informed*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Communications Consistent*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Outcome
14 fieldsNotification Required*
- No3 pts
- Yes1 pt
Notified Date
Within Deadline*
- Yes3 pts
- Late0 pts
- Not required3 pts
Root Cause Identified*
- Yes3 pts
- Probable1 pt
- No0 pts
RCA ID
Links to FDN-013 RCA ID
Breach Closed*
- Yes3 pts
- Open1 pt
Action Required*
Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.
- No2 pts
- Yes0 pts
Priority
- High0 pts
- Medium1 pt
- Low3 pts
CAPA ID
Format CAPA-2026-00000.
Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID
Action Owner
Privacy Lead*
Signature*
Site Manager*
Second Signature*
CMP-033 · record IDs look like DBR-2026-000 · Links Security incidents, Notification
Open in KnowellaRun it with agents
From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself
The form captures the assessment. What determines whether a breach is caught, assessed and notified on time is whether the surrounding process notices the incident happened at all.
Holds the breach register against the processing register, starts the notification clock the moment a breach is opened, and flags a close deadline.
Surfaces occupational health data as a distinct, higher-sensitivity category the moment a breach record marks health data involved.
Extends the breach process to third-party systems, where a loss often happens outside the IT estate and is reported late as a result.

Watches Discovered and Status for a breach approaching the deadline, and raises it before the clock, not after.
This template lives in KnowComply — audit and governance. Audit programmes, legal register, management review, risk and certification.
Meet KnowComply→Glossary
Data Breach Record definitions and key terms
- Personal data breach
- A breach of security leading to accidental or unlawful destruction, loss, alteration, disclosure of, or access to personal data: confidentiality, integrity and availability, not only access.
- Special category data
- Data revealing health, biometric or genetic status, ethnic origin, or religious belief, raising the bar for what counts as a notifiable risk.
- Notification threshold
- The assessed likelihood a breach risks individuals' rights and freedoms, which determines whether notification is required, not the fact of the breach alone.
- Undue delay
- The standard most clocks use instead of a fixed point: notification as soon as reasonably possible, with 72 hours the outer limit, not the target.
- Containment
- The immediate action to stop a breach worsening, such as recovering a device or securing a system, distinct from later harm assessment.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions about data breach record
What is a data breach record?+
It documents the loss, exposure or unauthorised access to personal data from discovery through containment, harm assessment and any notification made, one record per incident.
How is this different from a cyber incident record?+
Cyber Incident Record holds the technical response where the incident originated in a system compromise: forensics, recovery, hardening. This is the privacy-facing companion, focused on the notification decision, and the two are often linked.
Does every breach have to be notified to the regulator?+
No. Notification depends on the assessed risk to individuals. A breach unlikely to result in a risk can be closed with Notification Required recorded No, provided the reasoning is captured.
How is a data breach record scored?+
Breaches notified on time, high is good. It rewards a completed assessment reaching a timely decision, notify or not, over a late or unreasoned one.
What starts the notification clock?+
The moment the organisation becomes aware, not when the investigation confirms scope. A long investigation before a decision does not pause the clock, which is why containment and assessment are tracked separately.
Who owns this record?+
The privacy lead, from discovery through the notification decision and closure, with the site manager and a second signature required to close it.
Keep going
Related templates and programmes
Industries this is written for
Programmes this belongs to
Used together in Data Protection and Information Security
Personal Data Processing Record
Records what personal data the organisation holds, why, on what basis and for how long
Data Protection Impact Assessment
Assesses the privacy impact of a new system or monitoring activity before it is introduced
Subject Access Request Record
Records a request from an individual for the data held about them, and how it was answered within the deadline
Information Security Risk Assessment
Assesses threats to systems, data and operational technology, including plant control systems
System Access Review
Reviews who has access to which systems and at what privilege level
Cyber Incident Record
Records a cyber event affecting systems, data or plant operation, with containment, recovery and notification
More in Data and Privacy
Personal Data Processing Record
Records what personal data the organisation holds, why, on what basis and for how long
Data Protection Impact Assessment
Assesses the privacy impact of a new system or monitoring activity before it is introduced
Subject Access Request Record
Records a request from an individual for the data held about them, and how it was answered within the deadline

Written and reviewed by
Siddarth Singh
Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella
Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.
- Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
- MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
- MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
- Six Sigma Black Belt
Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:
- ISO/IEC 27701:2019, clause 6.13, Information security incident management
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), Articles 33 and 34
- UK Data Protection Act 2018, sections 67-68
- HHS HIPAA Breach Notification Rule, 45 CFR 164.400-414
This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.