Knowella

Local Exhaust Ventilation Examination

A local exhaust ventilation examination is the periodic, measured test of a captured-extraction system against its design specification, carried out by a competent examiner rather than the operator who uses it. Its recurring failure is treating the visit as a condition inspection, hood undamaged, fan running, when the duty is a quantified comparison of face velocity, duct velocity and static pressure against the figures the system was designed to achieve.

KnowHealthInspectionHLT-05450 fields across 5 sectionsFull researchSee the form

Reviewed by Siddarth SinghCSPLast reviewed 16 August 2026

Basis
ISO 45001 cl.8.1
Workspace
KnowHealth
Form type
Inspection
Completed by
A competent examiner, at the statutory interval
Feeds
Corrective work orders and the exposure control plan

The short version

  • The examination is a measured test against a design specification, not a condition inspection. A hood that looks undamaged and a fan that is audibly running say nothing about whether face velocity still meets the design figure.
  • Results only mean something set against the commissioning data or design specification. Measuring airflow with no baseline to compare it against has generated a number, not a finding.
  • This is a statutory duty in several jurisdictions with a specific minimum interval, most consequentially the fourteen-month default under UK COSHH, and it cannot be satisfied by frequent operator-level checks, however diligent.
  • Use in practice matters as much as the numbers. A system measuring correctly at the duct but with the hood positioned wrong for the actual task is not an effective control regardless of what the gauge says.
  • A defect found here has to close through a corrective record, not through the same document. An examination recording defects with no link to the work order that fixed them cannot demonstrate the system was restored.

What this is

What is a local exhaust ventilation examination?

What is a local exhaust ventilation examination?

It is a periodic thorough examination and test of a local exhaust ventilation system, the engineering control that captures a contaminant at the point it is generated. A competent examiner measures face velocity, duct velocity and static pressure, compares them against the system's design performance, and records whether it remains effective.

How is this different from general ventilation?

Local exhaust ventilation is a captured-extraction control positioned at the source of a specific contaminant, engineered to a design airflow. General ventilation moves and dilutes air across a space and is not aimed at a source. A general ventilation performance check is a different, lighter instrument answering a different question.

Who is a competent examiner?

Someone with the training, instrumentation and experience to measure airflow correctly and interpret the result against the system's design, usually not the person who operates the equipment day to day. Several jurisdictions expect this competence to be demonstrable, not asserted.

Scope

When is a local exhaust ventilation examination required?

This is the specific, measured examination for a captured local exhaust system, distinct from both general ventilation and the daily operator check that sits beneath it.

Use this template when

  • A local exhaust system, hood, booth, downdraught bench or similar, is due its periodic thorough examination and test
  • The system has undergone a design, ducting, hood or fan change that warrants re-examination before the next statutory date
  • A previous examination or defect report needs a follow-up confirming the system was restored to specification
  • The workspace is being set up for the Respiratory Protection programme and this record is one of its steps
  • A linked record needs this one to exist, including exposure control and preventive maintenance plans

Do not use it for

  • Ventilation Performance Check, the frequent, operator-level indicator check that sits between examinations
  • Occupational Hygiene Programme Review, which assesses the whole hygiene programme rather than one system's measured performance
  • General ventilation or air-conditioning performance, a whole-room dilution system rather than a captured-extraction control, examined against a different standard
  • Anything outside KnowHealth, which belongs in the workspace that owns that process

Compliance mapping

Which ISO 45001 cl.8.1 requirements does this satisfy?

Where a captured local exhaust system is the control for a hazardous substance, several jurisdictions attach a specific, named periodic-examination duty to it, unusual for a control measure and reflecting how easily degraded extraction goes unnoticed.

ClauseRequirementWhere it lands
COSHH 2002 reg.9(2) and Schedule 4 (GB)Thorough examination and test of LEV at the statutory interval, fourteen months by default and shorter for named processesAgainst design
ISO 45001 cl.9.1.1Monitoring and measurement of the performance of engineering controlsAgainst design
ISO 45001 cl.8.1.1Operational controls established, maintained and verified to remain effectiveCondition
ISO 45001 cl.7.2Competence of persons carrying out work affecting OH&S performance, determined and evidencedHeader
ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1Human and organisational factors in how a control is actually used, not only its physical conditionUse in practice
ISO 45001 cl.10.2Nonconformity identified and corrective action initiated, assigned and closedOutcome

What it does not cover

  • Ventilation Performance Check, the frequent operator-level gauge and visual check that runs between examinations and cannot substitute for the measured test.
  • Occupational Hygiene Programme Review, which reviews the whole hygiene programme rather than one system's measured performance.
  • The exposure or COSHH assessment that determined a local exhaust system was the required control and set the performance standard.
  • Corrective maintenance itself, which belongs in the linked work order once a defect has been raised here.
  • General ventilation assessment, which addresses whole-room air exchange and dilution rather than a captured, source-point extraction system.

Global

Local Exhaust Ventilation Examination requirements by country

This is one of the few control measures with a named, numbered statutory examination interval in some jurisdictions, sharply contrasting with jurisdictions that leave the method open.

United Kingdom

COSHH 2002, regulation 9(2) and Schedule 4

Local exhaust ventilation must be thoroughly examined and tested at least once every fourteen months, with shorter intervals set for specified higher-risk processes.

This is a hard statutory clock, not recommended practice; missing the interval is itself a breach independent of whether the system happens to be performing adequately.

United States

OSH Act General Duty Clause; ANSI/ASSP Z9.2 and substance-specific standards

No general federal standard sets a periodic examination interval for local exhaust systems; the obligation is inferred from maintaining a control a substance standard already requires.

ANSI/ASSP Z9.2 provides the technical basis examiners typically test against even though not itself mandatory; ad hoc inspection is weaker ground than a defined periodic test.

International

ISO 45001 cl.9.1.1

Monitoring and measurement of control performance is required as part of the management system, with interval and method set by the organisation.

Certification auditors expect a defined, risk-based interval and evidence of a competent examiner, even where no external statute names a number.

How to complete it

How to complete a local exhaust ventilation examination, step by step

Every field here can be filled in by someone who walked around the system rather than measured it, exactly the shortcut the record exists to prevent.

Measure against the design, not the last visit

Face velocity, duct velocity and static pressure only mean something set against the figure the system was designed and commissioned to achieve. Comparing only with last year's reading can mask a system drifting downward across several examination cycles.

Separate condition from performance

An undamaged hood, intact duct and running fan are necessary but not sufficient. Record both, because a system can be in good physical condition and still fail its performance test, and the two findings call for different responses.

Weigh use in practice as heavily as the numbers

A hood positioned wrong for the task, or operators who have learned to work faster than its intended cycle, defeats a correctly performing system just as thoroughly as a fouled duct. An examiner who only takes readings misses this category entirely.

Close defects through the linked work order, not this record

A defect recorded here is a finding, not a repair. Route it to a corrective record with an owner, and confirm at the next examination the fix was made and held, rather than simply noting the defect again.

What auditors find

Most common local exhaust ventilation examination findings

Findings here fall into two groups: examinations that measured condition but not performance, and performance data with no baseline to judge it against.

FindingClauseWhat fixes it
Face or duct velocity not measured; examination limited to visual condition.ISO 45001 cl.9.1.1Measure face velocity, duct velocity and static pressure at every examination, not only at commissioning.
No design specification or commissioning data available to compare results against.COSHH 2002 reg.9(2)Recover or reconstruct the design specification; record the baseline against the system reference.
Examination carried out beyond the statutory interval.COSHH 2002 reg.9(2) and Sch.4Schedule the next examination from the statutory interval, not from the date the last one happened to run.
Examiner competence not evidenced.ISO 45001 cl.7.2Record the examiner's competence basis, not only their name, against the examination.
System performs to specification but hood position or operator practice defeats capture in actual use.ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1Observe the task in progress as part of the examination, not only the static system.
Defect found with no work order raised, or a repeat defect from the previous examination.ISO 45001 cl.10.2Link every defect to a work order when raised and verify closure before the next examination.

Case in point

Case in point: the examination that measured the wrong thing

A metal finishing shop had its local exhaust system examined every fourteen months as required. Each report recorded the hood as undamaged, the fan as running, and the duct as free of visible blockage, signed off satisfactory. No face or duct velocity figures appeared in any of the three most recent reports, because the examiner was checking condition rather than testing performance.

An occupational hygiene survey commissioned after workers reported throat irritation measured face velocity at roughly half the original design figure. The duct had partially fouled with fine particulate over several years, a gradual process a condition check would never reveal and that only a velocity measurement against the design specification could have caught.

The template

The template, field by field

The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.

50fields
5 sections
Reference
HLT-054
Archetype
Inspection
Record ID
LEV-2026-000
Scoring
Systems compliant
Direction
High is good
Singleton
Yes
Basis
ISO 45001 cl.8.1
Links
Links Exposure control, PM plans
Tags
Hygiene, LEV
Sections
5
Fields
50
Follow up fields
3
Repeating sections
0
Links out
3
Field typesOwn ID, generated on saveCase thread and parentPick list from a registryLinked to another templateFollow up, dashed outlineScored

Header

13 fields
Text

Examination ID*

Generated on save

Auto sequence. Format LEV-2026-000.

The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.

Single Choice

Status*

Scored

Drives who this goes to next.

  • Planned2 pts
  • In progress2 pts
  • Complete3 pts
  • Deferred0 pts
  • Open0 pts
  • Closed3 pts
  • Overdue0 pts
Date & Time

Date and Time*

Users

Completed By*

Pick List

Site*

From FDN-001 Site NameFilter: Status is Active
Text

Site ID*

Linked

Format SITE-000.

Links to FDN-001 Site ID

Text

System Reference*

Single Choice

System Type*

Fixed hoodMovable captureBoothDowndraught benchWhole roomProximityLocal exhaustGeneral ventilation
Date & Time

Previous Examination

Optional
Text

Examiner*

Single Choice

Examiner Competent*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Within Statutory Interval*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Overdue0 pts
Info

Extraction Nobody Has Measured

A hood that hums is not a hood that works. Airflow degrades as ducts foul and fans wear, and without measurement the decline is invisible until somebody gets ill.

Against design

6 fields
Single Choice

Design Performance Specification Available*

Scored
  • Yes2 pts
  • No0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Face Velocity Measured*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Duct Velocity Measured*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Static Pressure Measured*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Results Compared With Commissioning Data*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Performance Within Specification*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts

Condition

6 fields
Single Choice

Hoods Undamaged And Correctly Positioned*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Ducting Free Of Damage And Blockage*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Filters Within Service Life*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Fan Operating Correctly*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Discharge Point Safe And Unobstructed*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Make Up Air Adequate*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts

Use in practice

6 fields
Single Choice

Hood Position Suits The Actual Task*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Operators Using It Correctly*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Gauge Or Indicator Fitted And Readable*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Daily Check In Place*

Scored
  • Yes2 pts
  • No0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

System Switched On When Needed*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Contaminant Actually Captured*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts

Outcome

19 fields
Single Choice

System Effective*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Numeric Answer

Defects Found*

Scored
Single Choice

Immediate Action Required*

Scored
  • No3 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Report Issued*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Pending1 pt
  • No0 pts
Text

Work Order ID

OptionalLinked

Links to MNT-002 Work Order ID

Date & Time

Next Examination Due*

Numeric Answer

Items Assessed*

Excludes anything marked N/A.

Numeric Answer

Items Failed*

Numeric Answer

Score Percent*

Scored

Calculated on submission. High is good. N/A items leave the denominator.

Single Choice

Result Band*

Scored
  • Pass3 pts
  • Caution1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
Numeric Answer

Completeness Percent*

How much of the template was actually answered. A high score on a half completed form is not a high score.

Single Choice

Action Required*

Scored

Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.

  • No2 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Priority

OptionalScoredShows if Action Required equals Yes
  • High0 pts
  • Medium1 pt
  • Low3 pts
Text

CAPA ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Action Required equals Yes

Format CAPA-2026-00000.

Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID

Users

Action Owner

OptionalShows if Action Required equals Yes
Users

Examiner*

Signature

Signature*

Users

Engineering Manager*

Signature

Second Signature*

HLT-054 · record IDs look like LEV-2026-000 · Links Exposure control, PM plans

Open in Knowella

Run it with agents

From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself

The examination itself is a specialist visit every fourteen months or so. What fails around it is the missing baseline, the defect that never became a work order, and the interval that quietly slips past its statutory date.

KnowHealth

Holds the examination against the system register and linked exposure control plan, confirming every LEV system has a current, in-date examination on file.

KnowMaintain

Converts a logged defect into a work order with an owner, linking the repair back to this record so the next examination can verify it held.

KnowComply

Tracks the statutory examination interval per system against jurisdiction, and raises the next examination before the date, not after it.

Ella
Ella

Watches for examinations recorded without velocity or pressure figures, and flags them as incomplete before they are treated as a pass.

This template lives in KnowHealth — employee wellbeing. Exposure monitoring, health surveillance, case management and return to work.

Meet KnowHealth→

Glossary

Local Exhaust Ventilation Examination definitions and key terms

Face velocity
The speed of air moving into the hood opening, measured directly in front of it, and the primary figure a design specification sets a minimum for.
Duct velocity
The speed of air through the ductwork, which must stay high enough to keep captured particulate airborne rather than settling and building up inside the duct.
Static pressure
The pressure differential across a point in the system, commonly a filter, used as an indirect indicator of airflow and of how loaded a filter has become.
Thorough examination and test
The statutory term, under COSHH, for the periodic measured inspection of a local exhaust system against its design performance, by a competent examiner.
Local exhaust ventilation (LEV)
An engineering control that captures a contaminant at or near the point it is generated, distinct from general or dilution ventilation acting across a whole space.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about local exhaust ventilation examination

What is the statutory interval for a thorough examination?+

Under COSHH in Great Britain, at least every fourteen months, with named higher-risk processes set shorter, six months or, for some blasting processes, one month. Most other jurisdictions have no general statutory interval, though ISO 45001 requires one be defined.

Can the daily performance check replace this examination?+

No. The daily check reads one indicator at operator level and cannot measure velocity or static pressure against a design specification. The two are complementary; clean daily checks say nothing about whether design performance is still achieved.

What counts as a competent examiner?+

Someone with the training, instrumentation and experience to take the airflow measurements and interpret them against the system's design, typically a specialist role distinct from the day-to-day operator, with their competence basis recorded, not assumed.

What if there is no design specification to compare against?+

The examination should still run and should record the missing baseline as a finding in its own right, since a measured result with nothing to compare it to cannot answer the question. Recovering the design figure is then an outstanding action.

Does a system that passes its measurements automatically pass the examination?+

No. Use in practice, hood position and correct operator use, is assessed separately, because a system measuring correctly at the duct can still fail to capture the contaminant if not positioned or used as intended.

How is a local exhaust system different from general ventilation for this purpose?+

Local exhaust ventilation captures a contaminant at its source, examined against a design airflow at the hood and duct. General ventilation dilutes air across a space and has no equivalent figure, so it is assessed by a different, lighter instrument.

Keep going

Related templates and programmes

Siddarth Singh

Written and reviewed by

Siddarth Singh

Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella

Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.

  • Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
  • MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
  • MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
  • Six Sigma Black Belt
Verify with BCSP →

Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:

  • COSHH 2002, regulation 9(2) and Schedule 4 (GB)
  • ISO 45001:2018 clauses 8.1.1, 9.1.1, 7.2 and 10.2
  • HSE HSG258, Controlling airborne contaminants at work
  • ANSI/ASSP Z9.2, Fundamentals governing the design and operation of local exhaust ventilation systems

This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.

Start in Minutes, Not Weeks

Launch a Ready-Made Template and Customize It Your Way

Every template is fully editable. Adjust fields, workflows, and branding to match your processes, then deploy to your team instantly.