Knowella

Delivery Point Assessment

The recurring failure is that this assessment gets completed once, on the first delivery, then quietly ages out as the site changes — a new dock manager, a resurfaced yard, a banksman who stopped turning up — while drivers keep reversing and handling loads against conditions nobody has matched to what was actually assessed, at a site the carrier never controlled to begin with.

KnowFleetAssessmentFLT-03848 fields across 6 sectionsFull researchSee the form

Reviewed by Siddarth SinghCSPLast reviewed 16 August 2026

Basis
ISO 39001 cl.6.1
Workspace
KnowFleet
Form type
Assessment
Review trigger
First delivery, then after any incident
Completed by
Transport

The short version

  • A delivery point assessment covers access, reversing, unloading and driver welfare at a site the carrier does not control — it is not a route or journey risk assessment, and treating it as one leaves reversing and manual-handling hazards unassessed.
  • The scoring runs on a residual band where low is good: a site with poor access, forced reversing and no banksman scores worse than one with clean access, even if both carry a generic 'satisfactory' write-up.
  • It is a singleton per site, not per visit — first delivery and post-incident are the only defined triggers, so a site with no incidents and no new deliveries can go unreviewed indefinitely unless a review date is enforced.
  • The outcome section is where the record either earns its keep or doesn't: 'Acceptable To Continue Deliveries' with conditions, unlinked to an actual action record, is a judgement with no control behind it.

What this is

What is a delivery point assessment?

What is a delivery point assessment?

A delivery point assessment is a site-specific check carried out at a customer or supplier's premises, covering vehicle access, reversing and turning space, unloading arrangements and driver welfare. It exists because the carrier does not control the site, only the vehicle and driver arriving at it. It sits under ISO 39001 cl.6.1 as part of the Cold Chain and Transport programme.

What counts as a 'delivery point' rather than a 'journey'?

The journey assessment covers the route, weather and hours getting to the site. The delivery point assessment covers what happens once the vehicle arrives — the yard, the dock, the equipment and the people managing it. A single journey can touch several delivery points, each needing its own record.

Why is this a singleton record rather than a per-visit form?

Access, turning space and unloading arrangements at a fixed site rarely change delivery to delivery, so the record is set up once per site and maintained, rather than repeated on every trip. It is reopened when the trigger conditions apply — first delivery, or after an incident — not on a fixed calendar.

Scope

When is a delivery point assessment required?

This assessment is one step in the Cold Chain and Transport programme, scoped to the delivery point itself. Using it to cover the journey, the vehicle or the load turns it into a form that reports on everything and nothing.

Use this template when

  • A vehicle is delivering to this site for the first time
  • An incident has occurred at this delivery point and the arrangements need re-checking
  • The customer register needs a linked site record for reporting
  • A recurring delivery point has changed materially — new dock, new access route, new landlord
  • A journey risk assessment has flagged the delivery point as the open hazard requiring its own record

Do not use it for

  • Journey Risk Assessment, which covers the route, weather, hours and load for the trip, not the site at the end of it.
  • Reversing and Manoeuvring Assessment, which assesses reversing at each regular location in its own right, and whether it can be designed out.
  • Adverse Weather Driving Record, which records the decision to run, delay or cancel a journey — made before the vehicle reaches any delivery point.
  • Load Securement Check, which belongs to the vehicle and the load, not the site receiving it.
  • Anything outside KnowFleet, which belongs in the workspace that owns that process.

Compliance mapping

Which ISO 39001 cl.6.1 requirements does this satisfy?

ISO 39001 cl.6.1 requires the organisation to address risks arising from factors it does not directly control, which is exactly the position a driver is in at someone else's site. The clauses below map that requirement onto the assessment's sections.

ClauseRequirementWhere it lands
ISO 39001 cl.6.1Address risks at locations outside the organisation's direct controlAccess
ISO 39001 cl.6.1Identify the trigger that requires a new or repeat assessmentHeader
ISO 39001 cl.8.1Plan and control unloading operations, including customer-provided equipmentUnloading
ISO 39001 cl.8.1Control manual handling and equipment risk where the operation sits outside the fleet's own siteUnloading
ISO 39001 cl.7.4Communicate site rules, induction and emergency arrangements to drivers before they are exposed to themSafety arrangements
ISO 39001 cl.9.1Monitor incident history at the delivery point and set a review intervalOutcome
ISO 39001 cl.10.2Raise and own corrective action where the residual risk is not acceptableOutcome
ISO 39001 cl.7.5Retain the record, including sign-off, as documented informationOutcome

What it does not cover

  • Reversing Required: Yes with no banksman recorded, which leaves a driver reversing blind at a site the carrier does not control and has no witness to the manoeuvre.
  • Driver Required To Handle Load: Yes with Manual Handling Assessed: No, which means the driver is doing physical work the carrier has never actually assessed.
  • Acceptable To Continue Deliveries: With conditions and no Controls Required text, which records a caveat nobody can act on because it was never written down.
  • Action Required: Yes with no CAPA ID entered, which leaves the corrective action floating outside the record that is supposed to own it.
  • Next Review Due left blank or set years out on a site scoring Medium or High risk, which turns a residual-band judgement into a permanent one.

Global

Delivery Point Assessment requirements by country

The obligation to look after a driver on someone else's premises does not disappear at the gate. Three frameworks make that explicit in different ways.

United Kingdom

Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, s.2

An employer's duty to ensure the health and safety of its employees extends to the system of work provided, including work carried out at a third party's premises the employer does not control.

A carrier cannot discharge its duty to a driver by pointing at the customer's yard — it has to show it assessed the site and controlled what it could before sending the vehicle.

Australia (and other model WHS jurisdictions)

Work Health and Safety Act (model law), s.19(2)

A person conducting a business or undertaking owes a duty to workers even while they are carrying out work for that business at another person's workplace.

The duty travels with the driver onto the customer's site — it is not transferred to whoever occupies the premises.

International

ISO 39001:2012 cl.6.1 and cl.8.1

A certified road traffic safety management system has to address risk factors the organisation does not directly control, and plan operations — including at third-party locations — accordingly.

For a certified fleet, the delivery point assessment is not optional good practice; it is the evidence a cl.6.1 risk has actually been addressed.

How to complete it

How to complete a delivery point assessment, step by step

Filling in every field is the easy part. The judgement calls below are what decide whether the record would survive a real incident investigation or a certification audit.

Was 'Reversing Required' answered for the normal delivery, not the best case?

A site can be reversed into cleanly on a quiet Tuesday morning and blind on a Friday afternoon with three other vehicles queued. The assessor's job is to record what a driver actually meets on a typical run, not the conditions on the day of the visit.

Does a 'With conditions' outcome have a control behind it?

Acceptable To Continue Deliveries: With conditions is a judgement, not a control. If Controls Required is blank, or the condition was never turned into an Action Required entry with an owner and a CAPA ID, the record has made a risk decision with nothing enforcing it.

Is the site treated as a living record or a one-off form?

Access, gradient and surface condition are true until the site changes. The record is only defensible if Next Review Due is set to something shorter than 'never', and if an incident actually triggers a fresh assessment rather than a note on the existing one.

Was the customer actually engaged, or was 'Raised With The Customer' a formality?

Yes and Not needed both score well, which makes it easy to tick past a real gap. The test is whether Customer Response Adequate reflects an actual reply from the site — a change to a dock, a banksman rota, an access route — not a form completed in isolation by transport.

What auditors find

Most common delivery point assessment findings

Patterns that recur across delivery point assessments, and what each one is actually telling the workspace.

FindingClauseWhat fixes it
Access and turning space score Yes at every site the fleet visits regularly, with no Partly or No anywhere in the register.ISO 39001 cl.6.1Sample a handful of high-traffic delivery points against current conditions, not the assessment on file — a uniformly clean register is more often unreviewed than genuinely safe.
Reversing Required: Yes shows up with Banksman Provided: No on the same record.ISO 39001 cl.8.1Treat this pairing as an open action by default — either arrange a banksman with the customer or record why reversing without one is accepted, with a named owner.
Driver Input Obtained is marked No on sites where drivers have raised concerns informally.ISO 39001 cl.7.4Route the assessment through the driver who actually delivers there before it is signed off, not just the assessor who visited once.
Incident History At This Point scores No on sites with a known near-miss that never reached the incident register.ISO 39001 cl.9.1Cross-check the delivery point against the incident and near-miss logs before scoring this field, not against memory.
Action Required: Yes records exist with no linked CAPA ID and no Action Owner populated.ISO 39001 cl.10.2Make the CAPA reference a condition of closing the assessment, not an optional follow-up field.
Next Review Due is set further out on Medium and High risk sites than on Low risk ones.ISO 39001 cl.9.1Tie the review interval to the risk band directly, so a higher residual score always produces a shorter review date.

Case in point

Case in point: a banksman who existed on paper

A distribution centre delivered to for two years scored Reversing Required: Yes and Banksman Provided: Yes on its original assessment, set up on the first delivery and never reopened. The banksman had been a temporary arrangement the customer used during a refit, and had not run since.

A reversing driver clipped a loading bay pillar on a delivery eighteen months later. The investigation found the assessment on file no longer matched how the site actually operated, and that nothing in the record had forced a review in between — the only defined trigger was 'first delivery and after incidents', and there had been no incident to force the second look until this one.

The template

The template, field by field

The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.

48fields
6 sections
Reference
FLT-038
Archetype
Assessment
Record ID
DPA-2026-000
Scoring
Residual band
Direction
Low is good
Singleton
Yes
Basis
ISO 39001 cl.6.1
Links
Links Journey assessment, Customer register
Tags
Fleet, Delivery
Sections
6
Fields
48
Follow up fields
3
Repeating sections
0
Links out
4
Field typesOwn ID, generated on saveCase thread and parentPick list from a registryLinked to another templateFollow up, dashed outlineScored

Header

13 fields
Text

Assessment ID*

Generated on save

Auto sequence. Format DPA-2026-000.

The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.

Single Choice

Status*

Scored

Drives who this goes to next.

  • Planned2 pts
  • In progress2 pts
  • Complete3 pts
  • Deferred0 pts
  • Open0 pts
  • Closed3 pts
  • Overdue0 pts
Date & Time

Date and Time*

Users

Completed By*

Pick List

Site*

From FDN-001 Site NameFilter: Status is Active
Text

Site ID*

Linked

Format SITE-000.

Links to FDN-001 Site ID

Text

Delivery Point*

Single Choice

Site Type*

Retail storeDistribution centreManufacturing siteFoodserviceFarm or supplierResidential street
Numeric Answer

Deliveries Per Month

OptionalScored
Single Choice

Assessment Trigger*

ComplaintPermit requirementPlant changePeriodicNew installationAfter an incident
Users

Assessed By*

Single Choice

Driver Input Obtained*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Info

Premises You Do Not Control

Drivers are injured most often at customer sites, reversing blind into a yard nobody has assessed, unloading with equipment they have never used.

Access

6 fields
Single Choice

Access Suitable For Our Vehicles*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Turning Space Adequate*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Reversing Required*

Scored
  • Yes0 pts
  • No2 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Banksman Provided*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Gradient Manageable*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Surface Condition Acceptable*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts

Unloading

6 fields
Single Choice

Dock Or Tail Lift Unloading*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Equipment Provided By The Customer*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Driver Required To Handle Load*

Scored
  • Yes0 pts
  • No2 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Manual Handling Assessed*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Lighting Adequate*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Marginal1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Weather Protection Available*

Scored
  • Yes2 pts
  • No0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator

Safety arrangements

6 fields
Single Choice

Site Induction Given To Drivers*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Segregation From Pedestrians*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Welfare Facilities Available*

Scored
  • Yes2 pts
  • No0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Emergency Arrangements Explained*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Site Rules Communicated*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Incident History At This Point*

Scored
  • Yes0 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No3 pts

Related records

1 field
Text

Customer Register ID

OptionalLinked

The customer whose site this is.

Links to FDN-021 Register ID

Outcome

16 fields
Single Choice

Risk Level*

Scored
  • Low3 pts
  • Medium1 pt
  • High0 pts
  • Very high0 pts
Single Choice

Acceptable To Continue Deliveries*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • With conditions1 pt
  • No0 pts
Text

Controls Required

Optional
Single Choice

Raised With The Customer*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Not needed3 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Customer Response Adequate*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Date & Time

Next Review Due*

Pick List

Risk Assessment

OptionalFrom FDN-012 Risk Title
Text

Risk ID

OptionalLinked

Format RSK-2026-00000.

Links to FDN-012 Risk ID

Single Choice

Action Required*

Scored

Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.

  • No2 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Priority

OptionalScoredShows if Action Required equals Yes
  • High0 pts
  • Medium1 pt
  • Low3 pts
Text

CAPA ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Action Required equals Yes

Format CAPA-2026-00000.

Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID

Users

Action Owner

OptionalShows if Action Required equals Yes
Users

Transport*

Signature

Signature*

Users

Logistics Manager*

Signature

Second Signature*

FLT-038 · record IDs look like DPA-2026-000 · Links Journey assessment, Customer register

Open in Knowella

Run it with agents

From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself

The form is the easy part. Keeping it current, routing it to the right owner and holding the evidence together across sites is the work that actually slips.

KnowFleet

Holds the delivery point assessment against the customer register and the journey library, and flags when a site is overdue its review or has an incident with no follow-up assessment.

KnowSafe

Carries the incident and near-miss log a delivery point assessment should be checked against before Incident History At This Point gets marked No from memory.

KnowLogistics

Tracks which delivery points are active, how often they're visited, and which ones a driver has raised a concern about that never made it into a formal assessment.

Ella
Ella

Coordinates the crew, rolls completion and exceptions into one view, and holds every write for your approval before it touches a record.

This template lives in KnowFleet — fleet and transport. Drivers, vehicles, hours, cargo securement and operator licence compliance.

Meet KnowFleet→

Glossary

Delivery Point Assessment definitions and key terms

Residual band
A scoring model that reflects the risk remaining after existing controls are accounted for, rather than the raw hazard. Low is good on this template — a low band means the controls in place are judged sufficient for the residual risk left over.
Singleton record
A record type set up once per subject — here, once per delivery point — and maintained over time, rather than created fresh for every event. Other templates and registers refer back to the single record rather than each holding their own copy.
Banksman
A person positioned to guide a vehicle during a reversing or manoeuvring operation, typically where sightlines from the cab are inadequate. Their presence, or absence, is one of the clearest indicators of how a reversing hazard is actually being controlled at a site.
Safe System (ISO 39001)
The approach underlying ISO 39001, which treats road safety as an interaction of road users, vehicles, speeds and roads or sites, none of which is expected to fail in isolation without the others compensating. A delivery point assessment is one input into that system for the 'site' factor.
CAPA
Corrective and Preventive Action — the record raised to close out a finding. On this template, an Action Required: Yes answer is only as good as the CAPA ID it links to; without one, the finding has nowhere to be tracked to closure.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about delivery point assessment

Who should complete a delivery point assessment?+

Transport completes it, ideally with input from the driver who actually delivers to the site — Driver Input Obtained is a scored field precisely because an assessment done without the person exposed to the hazard tends to miss what changes site to site.

Does a good delivery point assessment mean the site is safe forever?+

No. It is a snapshot against a trigger — first delivery or after an incident. A site that changes its dock, its tenant or its traffic volume without an incident occurring can drift out of date indefinitely unless a review date is enforced.

What happens if reversing can't be avoided at a site?+

Reversing Required: Yes does not fail the assessment on its own — it should be paired with a control, most often a banksman, and reflected honestly in the outcome rather than offset by unrelated Yes answers elsewhere in the form.

How does this relate to the Reversing and Manoeuvring Assessment?+

The delivery point assessment flags that reversing happens at a site; the Reversing and Manoeuvring Assessment goes deeper on whether that specific manoeuvre can be redesigned out entirely. A site with reversing recorded here is a candidate for the other template, not a substitute for it.

What triggers a re-assessment beyond the first delivery?+

An incident at the delivery point. In practice most workspaces also want a periodic review — the template supports one through Next Review Due — because relying on an incident as the only trigger means the first sign of a problem is the problem itself.

What does 'Acceptable To Continue Deliveries: With conditions' actually commit the workspace to?+

It commits the workspace to whatever is written in Controls Required and, ideally, to an Action Required entry with an owner and a CAPA reference. Without those, 'with conditions' is a risk decision recorded without anything holding it in place.

Keep going

Related templates and programmes

Siddarth Singh

Written and reviewed by

Siddarth Singh

Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella

Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.

  • Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
  • MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
  • MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
  • Six Sigma Black Belt
Verify with BCSP →

Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:

  • ISO 39001:2012 — Road traffic safety (RTS) management systems, cl.6.1 and cl.8.1
  • Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (UK), s.2
  • Model Work Health and Safety Act, s.19(2)

This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.

Start in Minutes, Not Weeks

Launch a Ready-Made Template and Customize It Your Way

Every template is fully editable. Adjust fields, workflows, and branding to match your processes, then deploy to your team instantly.