What this is
What is a delivery point assessment?
What is a delivery point assessment?
A delivery point assessment is a site-specific check carried out at a customer or supplier's premises, covering vehicle access, reversing and turning space, unloading arrangements and driver welfare. It exists because the carrier does not control the site, only the vehicle and driver arriving at it. It sits under ISO 39001 cl.6.1 as part of the Cold Chain and Transport programme.
What counts as a 'delivery point' rather than a 'journey'?
The journey assessment covers the route, weather and hours getting to the site. The delivery point assessment covers what happens once the vehicle arrives — the yard, the dock, the equipment and the people managing it. A single journey can touch several delivery points, each needing its own record.
Why is this a singleton record rather than a per-visit form?
Access, turning space and unloading arrangements at a fixed site rarely change delivery to delivery, so the record is set up once per site and maintained, rather than repeated on every trip. It is reopened when the trigger conditions apply — first delivery, or after an incident — not on a fixed calendar.
Scope
When is a delivery point assessment required?
This assessment is one step in the Cold Chain and Transport programme, scoped to the delivery point itself. Using it to cover the journey, the vehicle or the load turns it into a form that reports on everything and nothing.
Use this template when
- A vehicle is delivering to this site for the first time
- An incident has occurred at this delivery point and the arrangements need re-checking
- The customer register needs a linked site record for reporting
- A recurring delivery point has changed materially — new dock, new access route, new landlord
- A journey risk assessment has flagged the delivery point as the open hazard requiring its own record
Do not use it for
- Journey Risk Assessment, which covers the route, weather, hours and load for the trip, not the site at the end of it.
- Reversing and Manoeuvring Assessment, which assesses reversing at each regular location in its own right, and whether it can be designed out.
- Adverse Weather Driving Record, which records the decision to run, delay or cancel a journey — made before the vehicle reaches any delivery point.
- Load Securement Check, which belongs to the vehicle and the load, not the site receiving it.
- Anything outside KnowFleet, which belongs in the workspace that owns that process.
Compliance mapping
Which ISO 39001 cl.6.1 requirements does this satisfy?
ISO 39001 cl.6.1 requires the organisation to address risks arising from factors it does not directly control, which is exactly the position a driver is in at someone else's site. The clauses below map that requirement onto the assessment's sections.
| Clause | Requirement | Where it lands |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 39001 cl.6.1 | Address risks at locations outside the organisation's direct control | Access |
| ISO 39001 cl.6.1 | Identify the trigger that requires a new or repeat assessment | Header |
| ISO 39001 cl.8.1 | Plan and control unloading operations, including customer-provided equipment | Unloading |
| ISO 39001 cl.8.1 | Control manual handling and equipment risk where the operation sits outside the fleet's own site | Unloading |
| ISO 39001 cl.7.4 | Communicate site rules, induction and emergency arrangements to drivers before they are exposed to them | Safety arrangements |
| ISO 39001 cl.9.1 | Monitor incident history at the delivery point and set a review interval | Outcome |
| ISO 39001 cl.10.2 | Raise and own corrective action where the residual risk is not acceptable | Outcome |
| ISO 39001 cl.7.5 | Retain the record, including sign-off, as documented information | Outcome |
What it does not cover
- Reversing Required: Yes with no banksman recorded, which leaves a driver reversing blind at a site the carrier does not control and has no witness to the manoeuvre.
- Driver Required To Handle Load: Yes with Manual Handling Assessed: No, which means the driver is doing physical work the carrier has never actually assessed.
- Acceptable To Continue Deliveries: With conditions and no Controls Required text, which records a caveat nobody can act on because it was never written down.
- Action Required: Yes with no CAPA ID entered, which leaves the corrective action floating outside the record that is supposed to own it.
- Next Review Due left blank or set years out on a site scoring Medium or High risk, which turns a residual-band judgement into a permanent one.
Global
Delivery Point Assessment requirements by country
The obligation to look after a driver on someone else's premises does not disappear at the gate. Three frameworks make that explicit in different ways.
Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, s.2
An employer's duty to ensure the health and safety of its employees extends to the system of work provided, including work carried out at a third party's premises the employer does not control.
A carrier cannot discharge its duty to a driver by pointing at the customer's yard — it has to show it assessed the site and controlled what it could before sending the vehicle.
Work Health and Safety Act (model law), s.19(2)
A person conducting a business or undertaking owes a duty to workers even while they are carrying out work for that business at another person's workplace.
The duty travels with the driver onto the customer's site — it is not transferred to whoever occupies the premises.
ISO 39001:2012 cl.6.1 and cl.8.1
A certified road traffic safety management system has to address risk factors the organisation does not directly control, and plan operations — including at third-party locations — accordingly.
For a certified fleet, the delivery point assessment is not optional good practice; it is the evidence a cl.6.1 risk has actually been addressed.
How to complete it
How to complete a delivery point assessment, step by step
Filling in every field is the easy part. The judgement calls below are what decide whether the record would survive a real incident investigation or a certification audit.
A site can be reversed into cleanly on a quiet Tuesday morning and blind on a Friday afternoon with three other vehicles queued. The assessor's job is to record what a driver actually meets on a typical run, not the conditions on the day of the visit.
Acceptable To Continue Deliveries: With conditions is a judgement, not a control. If Controls Required is blank, or the condition was never turned into an Action Required entry with an owner and a CAPA ID, the record has made a risk decision with nothing enforcing it.
Access, gradient and surface condition are true until the site changes. The record is only defensible if Next Review Due is set to something shorter than 'never', and if an incident actually triggers a fresh assessment rather than a note on the existing one.
Yes and Not needed both score well, which makes it easy to tick past a real gap. The test is whether Customer Response Adequate reflects an actual reply from the site — a change to a dock, a banksman rota, an access route — not a form completed in isolation by transport.
What auditors find
Most common delivery point assessment findings
Patterns that recur across delivery point assessments, and what each one is actually telling the workspace.
| Finding | Clause | What fixes it |
|---|---|---|
| Access and turning space score Yes at every site the fleet visits regularly, with no Partly or No anywhere in the register. | ISO 39001 cl.6.1 | Sample a handful of high-traffic delivery points against current conditions, not the assessment on file — a uniformly clean register is more often unreviewed than genuinely safe. |
| Reversing Required: Yes shows up with Banksman Provided: No on the same record. | ISO 39001 cl.8.1 | Treat this pairing as an open action by default — either arrange a banksman with the customer or record why reversing without one is accepted, with a named owner. |
| Driver Input Obtained is marked No on sites where drivers have raised concerns informally. | ISO 39001 cl.7.4 | Route the assessment through the driver who actually delivers there before it is signed off, not just the assessor who visited once. |
| Incident History At This Point scores No on sites with a known near-miss that never reached the incident register. | ISO 39001 cl.9.1 | Cross-check the delivery point against the incident and near-miss logs before scoring this field, not against memory. |
| Action Required: Yes records exist with no linked CAPA ID and no Action Owner populated. | ISO 39001 cl.10.2 | Make the CAPA reference a condition of closing the assessment, not an optional follow-up field. |
| Next Review Due is set further out on Medium and High risk sites than on Low risk ones. | ISO 39001 cl.9.1 | Tie the review interval to the risk band directly, so a higher residual score always produces a shorter review date. |
Case in point
Case in point: a banksman who existed on paper
A distribution centre delivered to for two years scored Reversing Required: Yes and Banksman Provided: Yes on its original assessment, set up on the first delivery and never reopened. The banksman had been a temporary arrangement the customer used during a refit, and had not run since.
A reversing driver clipped a loading bay pillar on a delivery eighteen months later. The investigation found the assessment on file no longer matched how the site actually operated, and that nothing in the record had forced a review in between — the only defined trigger was 'first delivery and after incidents', and there had been no incident to force the second look until this one.
The template
The template, field by field
The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.
6 sections
- Reference
- FLT-038
- Archetype
- Assessment
- Record ID
- DPA-2026-000
- Scoring
- Residual band
- Direction
- Low is good
- Singleton
- Yes
- Basis
- ISO 39001 cl.6.1
- Links
- Links Journey assessment, Customer register
- Tags
- Fleet, Delivery
- Sections
- 6
- Fields
- 48
- Follow up fields
- 3
- Repeating sections
- 0
- Links out
- 4
Header
13 fieldsAssessment ID*
Auto sequence. Format DPA-2026-000.
The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.
Status*
Drives who this goes to next.
- Planned2 pts
- In progress2 pts
- Complete3 pts
- Deferred0 pts
- Open0 pts
- Closed3 pts
- Overdue0 pts
Date and Time*
Completed By*
Site*
Site ID*
Format SITE-000.
Links to FDN-001 Site ID
Delivery Point*
Site Type*
Deliveries Per Month
Assessment Trigger*
Assessed By*
Driver Input Obtained*
- Yes3 pts
- No0 pts
Premises You Do Not Control
Drivers are injured most often at customer sites, reversing blind into a yard nobody has assessed, unloading with equipment they have never used.
Access
6 fieldsAccess Suitable For Our Vehicles*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Turning Space Adequate*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Reversing Required*
- Yes0 pts
- No2 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Banksman Provided*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Gradient Manageable*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Surface Condition Acceptable*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Unloading
6 fieldsDock Or Tail Lift Unloading*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Equipment Provided By The Customer*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Driver Required To Handle Load*
- Yes0 pts
- No2 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Manual Handling Assessed*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Lighting Adequate*
- Yes3 pts
- Marginal1 pt
- No0 pts
Weather Protection Available*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Safety arrangements
6 fieldsSite Induction Given To Drivers*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Segregation From Pedestrians*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Welfare Facilities Available*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Emergency Arrangements Explained*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Site Rules Communicated*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Incident History At This Point*
- Yes0 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No3 pts
Related records
1 fieldCustomer Register ID
The customer whose site this is.
Links to FDN-021 Register ID
Outcome
16 fieldsRisk Level*
- Low3 pts
- Medium1 pt
- High0 pts
- Very high0 pts
Acceptable To Continue Deliveries*
- Yes3 pts
- With conditions1 pt
- No0 pts
Controls Required
Raised With The Customer*
- Yes3 pts
- Not needed3 pts
- No0 pts
Customer Response Adequate*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Next Review Due*
Risk Assessment
Risk ID
Format RSK-2026-00000.
Links to FDN-012 Risk ID
Action Required*
Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.
- No2 pts
- Yes0 pts
Priority
- High0 pts
- Medium1 pt
- Low3 pts
CAPA ID
Format CAPA-2026-00000.
Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID
Action Owner
Transport*
Signature*
Logistics Manager*
Second Signature*
FLT-038 · record IDs look like DPA-2026-000 · Links Journey assessment, Customer register
Open in KnowellaRun it with agents
From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself
The form is the easy part. Keeping it current, routing it to the right owner and holding the evidence together across sites is the work that actually slips.
Holds the delivery point assessment against the customer register and the journey library, and flags when a site is overdue its review or has an incident with no follow-up assessment.
Carries the incident and near-miss log a delivery point assessment should be checked against before Incident History At This Point gets marked No from memory.
Tracks which delivery points are active, how often they're visited, and which ones a driver has raised a concern about that never made it into a formal assessment.

Coordinates the crew, rolls completion and exceptions into one view, and holds every write for your approval before it touches a record.
This template lives in KnowFleet — fleet and transport. Drivers, vehicles, hours, cargo securement and operator licence compliance.
Meet KnowFleet→Glossary
Delivery Point Assessment definitions and key terms
- Residual band
- A scoring model that reflects the risk remaining after existing controls are accounted for, rather than the raw hazard. Low is good on this template — a low band means the controls in place are judged sufficient for the residual risk left over.
- Singleton record
- A record type set up once per subject — here, once per delivery point — and maintained over time, rather than created fresh for every event. Other templates and registers refer back to the single record rather than each holding their own copy.
- Banksman
- A person positioned to guide a vehicle during a reversing or manoeuvring operation, typically where sightlines from the cab are inadequate. Their presence, or absence, is one of the clearest indicators of how a reversing hazard is actually being controlled at a site.
- Safe System (ISO 39001)
- The approach underlying ISO 39001, which treats road safety as an interaction of road users, vehicles, speeds and roads or sites, none of which is expected to fail in isolation without the others compensating. A delivery point assessment is one input into that system for the 'site' factor.
- CAPA
- Corrective and Preventive Action — the record raised to close out a finding. On this template, an Action Required: Yes answer is only as good as the CAPA ID it links to; without one, the finding has nowhere to be tracked to closure.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions about delivery point assessment
Who should complete a delivery point assessment?+
Transport completes it, ideally with input from the driver who actually delivers to the site — Driver Input Obtained is a scored field precisely because an assessment done without the person exposed to the hazard tends to miss what changes site to site.
Does a good delivery point assessment mean the site is safe forever?+
No. It is a snapshot against a trigger — first delivery or after an incident. A site that changes its dock, its tenant or its traffic volume without an incident occurring can drift out of date indefinitely unless a review date is enforced.
What happens if reversing can't be avoided at a site?+
Reversing Required: Yes does not fail the assessment on its own — it should be paired with a control, most often a banksman, and reflected honestly in the outcome rather than offset by unrelated Yes answers elsewhere in the form.
How does this relate to the Reversing and Manoeuvring Assessment?+
The delivery point assessment flags that reversing happens at a site; the Reversing and Manoeuvring Assessment goes deeper on whether that specific manoeuvre can be redesigned out entirely. A site with reversing recorded here is a candidate for the other template, not a substitute for it.
What triggers a re-assessment beyond the first delivery?+
An incident at the delivery point. In practice most workspaces also want a periodic review — the template supports one through Next Review Due — because relying on an incident as the only trigger means the first sign of a problem is the problem itself.
What does 'Acceptable To Continue Deliveries: With conditions' actually commit the workspace to?+
It commits the workspace to whatever is written in Controls Required and, ideally, to an Action Required entry with an owner and a CAPA reference. Without those, 'with conditions' is a risk decision recorded without anything holding it in place.
Keep going
Related templates and programmes
Industries this is written for
Programmes this belongs to
Used together in Cold Chain and Transport
Transport Provider Assessment
Assesses a haulier for licensing, driver management, vehicle standards, temperature capability and load security
Load Securement Check
Confirms the load is secured correctly for its type, weight and journey
Weight and Axle Check
Records gross weight and axle loading against legal limits
Dangerous Goods Shipment Record
Records the shipping documents, placarding and segregation for a dangerous goods load
Temperature Log
Records product temperature through a journey, from loading to delivery
Cold Chain Excursion Record
Records a temperature deviation outside the acceptable range, with duration and product affected
More in Route and Journey
Journey Risk Assessment
Assesses a planned journey for route, weather, hours, load and delivery point hazards
Reversing and Manoeuvring Assessment
Assesses reversing at each regular location, and whether it can be designed out
Adverse Weather Driving Record
Records the decision to run, delay or cancel journeys in adverse weather, and who made it

Written and reviewed by
Siddarth Singh
Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella
Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.
- Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
- MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
- MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
- Six Sigma Black Belt
Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:
- ISO 39001:2012 — Road traffic safety (RTS) management systems, cl.6.1 and cl.8.1
- Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (UK), s.2
- Model Work Health and Safety Act, s.19(2)
This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.