Knowella

Weekly PM Checklist

A weekly check has room for the things a daily glance cannot cover: belt tension, chain lubrication, coupling alignment, interlocks. The recurring failure is treating it like the daily checklist with more boxes — rushing through it in the same few minutes and marking a slack belt or a slow interlock as Partial rather than Fail, because fixing it properly means booking downtime nobody wants to schedule that week.

KnowMaintainChecklistMNT-023Pinned in navigation56 fields across 6 sectionsFull researchSee the form

Reviewed by Siddarth SinghCSPLast reviewed 16 August 2026

Basis
ISO 55001 cl.8.2
Workspace
KnowMaintain
Form type
Checklist
Review trigger
Any Fail on drives, safety devices or function pulls Equipment Fit For Service off Yes
Completed by
The assigned technician, on a weekly cycle

The short version

  • The weekly checklist is scoped to slower-moving mechanical and safety items — drives, transmission, cleaning and access, safety devices — that a daily check does not have time for.
  • Scoring uses the same complete-with-knockout-items pattern as the rest of the PM family: a single Fail on drives, cleaning, safety devices or function overrides the rest and drives Equipment Fit For Service.
  • It is explicitly designed to route serious findings to a corrective work order rather than a same-visit fix, since most weekly items need downtime or parts to resolve properly.
  • It sits inside the Planned Maintenance programme alongside the Daily and Monthly checklists; used to cover either of those cadences, its history stops lining up with either.

What this is

What makes the weekly checklist different from the daily one?

What makes the weekly checklist different from the daily one?

The weekly checklist covers items that change on a slower cycle than daily wear — belt tension, chain and coupling condition, gearbox oil, cooling and ventilation, interlocks and pull cords — rather than the fast visual and level checks a daily look is scoped to. It assumes the daily checklist has already been catching anything acute in between.

Why does a weekly finding raise a corrective work order rather than get fixed on the spot?

Most weekly findings — a slack belt, a misaligned coupling, a failing interlock — need parts, isolation or scheduled downtime that a technician cannot resolve during the check itself. The template still allows Fixed On The Spot for genuinely trivial items, but the design expectation is that a weekly Fail more often becomes a tracked corrective work order than a same-visit fix.

What is a safety device on this checklist, specifically?

It refers to the Safety devices section: guards, interlocks, emergency stops, pull cords, warning devices and isolation points. These are function-tested weekly rather than only inspected visually, because a device that looks intact can still fail to actually interrupt the machine when triggered.

Scope

When is a weekly pm checklist required?

This checklist is built for the weekly cadence specifically — mechanical and safety items that move too slowly for a daily look and too fast to wait for the monthly cycle. Running it on a different schedule, or substituting it for a different checklist's scope, breaks the PM compliance trail.

Use this template when

  • The asset is due its scheduled weekly preventive check
  • A new record is needed and gets its own ID in the form PM-2026-00000
  • You are running the Planned Maintenance programme and this is this week's step in it
  • A finding on drives, cleaning, access or safety devices needs logging and, in most cases, a corrective work order
  • A linked PM Plan or Asset record needs this weekly record to exist against it

Do not use it for

  • Daily PM Checklist, which covers lubrication points, fluid levels and visual condition on a shift-start cycle.
  • Monthly PM Checklist, which covers deeper inspection, filter changes and fastener checks on a longer cycle.
  • Preventive Maintenance Plan, which sets the schedule and scope this checklist runs against, not the check itself.
  • Corrective Work Order, for tracking a weekly finding through to close-out once it is raised.
  • Anything outside KnowMaintain, which belongs in the workspace that owns that process.

Compliance mapping

Which ISO 55001 cl.8.2 requirements does this satisfy?

The checklist is built against ISO 55001 cl.8.2, the same operational-control clause underpinning the rest of the PM checklist family, applied here to the slower-cycle mechanical and safety items a weekly cadence covers.

ClauseRequirementWhere it lands
ISO 55001 cl.8.2Operational activity on the asset is controlled and traceable to a plan and a due date.Header
ISO 55001 cl.8.2Drive and transmission components are checked against defined tension, alignment and temperature criteria.Drives and transmission
ISO 55001 cl.8.2Cleaning, ventilation and access provisions are verified to remain effective between deeper inspections.Cleaning and access
ISO 55001 cl.8.2Safety devices are function-tested, not only visually inspected, on a defined cycle.Safety devices
ISO 55001 cl.8.2Deviations are captured, tagged by hazard type, and routed to correction.Findings
ISO 55001 cl.8.2The outcome and the asset's fitness for continued service are recorded and signed off by two parties.Result

What it does not cover

  • Interlocks Function, tested by sight rather than by actually triggering the device.
  • Corrective Work Order ID, left blank when Corrective Work Required is Yes, breaking the trail to the follow-up job.
  • Belts Tension And Condition, marked Partial repeatedly on the same asset without ever converting to a Fail.
  • Second Signature, added after the asset is already back in service rather than as a genuine second review.
  • Element Tag, left blank on a Fail, so the finding cannot be aggregated with matching hazard findings elsewhere.

Global

Weekly PM Checklist requirements by country

ISO 55001 provides the operational-control frame, but the safety-device items on this checklist sit directly on top of statutory machinery and work-equipment law wherever the asset actually runs.

International

ISO 55001 cl.8.2

Voluntary asset-management standard, often a customer or certification requirement.

Sets the expectation that safety devices and drive components are checked on a defined cycle, but its enforcement is limited to certification audit, not statute.

United Kingdom

Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998, regs. 5 and 11

Statutory duty to maintain equipment and to guard dangerous parts of machinery.

A Fail on Interlocks Function or Guards Secure that is not closed out promptly is direct evidence against these duties, independent of the ISO commitment.

United States

OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147

Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout), referencing isolation point accessibility.

Isolation Points Accessible failing on this checklist without a tracked fix is the kind of gap an OSHA lockout/tagout inspection would treat as a compliance failure, not a maintenance backlog item.

How to complete it

How to complete a weekly pm checklist, step by step

The mechanical answers are usually straightforward. The judgement calls sit in how a marginal condition gets scored and how quickly a safety-device Fail gets converted into a tracked job.

Where Partial stops being defensible on a safety device

For Interlocks Function, Emergency Stops Function and Pull Cords Function specifically, Partial should be rare — these are pass/fail by design, and a habitual Partial on them usually means the technician is unsure how to test the device properly, not that it is genuinely half-working.

When a drive-train finding gets fixed on the spot versus escalated

A belt or chain that needs re-tensioning during the visit can reasonably be Fixed On The Spot. A coupling that is misaligned, or a gearbox running hot, needs isolation and usually parts — recording it as fixed on the spot to avoid raising a work order hides a job that will resurface.

How Corrective Work Required and Corrective Work Order ID stay linked

A Yes on Corrective Work Required with no ID entered is the single most common way this checklist's findings get lost. The ID should be entered before the record is signed off, not added retrospectively once the job happens to get raised elsewhere.

What Equipment Fit For Service with restrictions actually commits to

Restrictions should be traceable — usually to the corrective work order created alongside it — or the next reader has an asset marked fit for service under conditions nobody recorded.

What auditors find

Most common weekly pm checklist findings

These are the gaps that show up repeatedly once a site has been running this checklist for a few months, each with a specific fix rather than a general reminder.

FindingClauseWhat fixes it
Interlocks Function and Emergency Stops Function both marked Pass without the device actually being triggered during the check.ISO 55001 cl.8.2Require a short confirmation note or photo on Pass for these two items specifically, not only on Fail.
Belts Tension And Condition marked Partial for several consecutive weeks on the same asset with no finding raised.ISO 55001 cl.8.2Auto-flag a Partial repeated three times on the same item and asset as a Fail requiring a Findings entry.
Corrective Work Required set to Yes with Corrective Work Order ID left blank.ISO 55001 cl.8.2Make Corrective Work Order ID a required field, validated against an open Work Order record, whenever Corrective Work Required is Yes.
Element Tag left blank on Fail results from the Safety devices section.ISO 55001 cl.8.2Make Element Tag required whenever Result is Fail, so safety-device failures roll up into the same hazard view as other templates.
Days Late and Reason If Late both blank on records clearly logged after the due date.ISO 55001 cl.8.2Calculate Days Late automatically from Date and Time against Due Date.
Second Signature captured well after the asset is already running again.ISO 55001 cl.8.2Timestamp both signatures and flag any gap beyond a shift for supervisor review.

Case in point

Case in point: an interlock marked Pass for six weeks running

A boning hall conveyor's guard interlock was marked Pass on six consecutive weekly checklists. Nobody had actually opened the guard to trigger the interlock during any of those checks — the technician was confirming the guard was closed, not that opening it stopped the machine.

An operator reached past the guard during a jam clearance and the machine kept running. The interlock had failed weeks earlier; the checklist had recorded a visual confirmation as a functional one, which is exactly the gap a required Pass-confirmation note on safety devices closes.

The template

The template, field by field

The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.

56fields
6 sections
Reference
MNT-023
Archetype
Checklist
Record ID
PM-2026-000
Scoring
Complete with knockout items
Direction
High is good
Singleton
No
Basis
ISO 55001 cl.8.2
Links
Links Asset, PM Plan
Tags
Maintenance, Preventive
Sections
6
Fields
56
Follow up fields
10
Repeating sections
1
Links out
5
Field typesOwn ID, generated on saveCase thread and parentPick list from a registryLinked to another templateFollow up, dashed outlineScored

Header

16 fields
Text

PM ID*

Generated on save

Auto sequence. Format PM-2026-00000.

The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.

Single Choice

Status*

Scored

Drives who this goes to next.

  • Planned2 pts
  • In progress2 pts
  • Complete3 pts
  • Deferred0 pts
  • Open0 pts
  • Closed3 pts
  • Overdue0 pts
Date & Time

Date and Time*

Users

Raised By*

Pick List

Site*

From FDN-001 Site NameFilter: Status is Active
Text

Site ID*

Linked

Format SITE-000.

Links to FDN-001 Site ID

Single Choice

Area

Optional

The area within the site.

Cutting roomBoning hallPackingChill storeFreezerPasteurisingFillingCulture roomDespatchYardWorkshopPlant roomOffices
Location

Exact Location

Optional

Drop a pin for anything hard to find.

Pick List

Asset*

From FDN-002 Asset NameFilter: Site matches, Status is Active
Text

Asset ID*

Linked

Format AST-0000.

Links to FDN-002 Asset ID

Text

PM Plan ID

OptionalLinked

Links to MNT-021 Plan ID

Text

Work Order ID

OptionalLinked

Links to MNT-002 Work Order ID

Date & Time

Due Date*

Single Choice

Completed On Time*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Late1 pt
  • Not completed0 pts
Numeric Answer

Days Late

OptionalShows if Completed On Time not equals Yes
Single Choice

Reason If Late

OptionalShows if Completed On Time not equals Yes
No production windowLabour shortagePartsPermitForgottenDeliberately deferred

Drives and transmission

6 fields
Single Choice

Belts Tension And Condition*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Chains Tension And Lubrication*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Couplings Aligned And Sound*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Gearbox Oil Level*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

No Excess Heat*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Mountings Secure*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator

Cleaning and access

6 fields
Single Choice

Equipment Clean*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Cooling Fins Clear*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Vents Unobstructed*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Cable Runs Secure*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Access Panels Secure*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Labels Legible*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts

Safety devices

6 fields
Single Choice

Guards Secure*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Interlocks Function*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Emergency Stops Function*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Pull Cords Function*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Warning Devices Function*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Isolation Points Accessible*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator

Findings

Repeats7 fields
Single Choice

Result*

Scored
  • Pass3 pts
  • Pass with conditions2 pts
  • Fail0 pts
Single Choice

Severity

OptionalScoredShows if Result equals Fail
  • Minor3 pts
  • Moderate1 pt
  • Serious0 pts
Single Choice

Element Tag

OptionalShows if Result equals Fail

Groups deficiencies by hazard type across every template.

Hazard identificationPPEHousekeepingEnergy isolationMachine guardingErgonomicsChemicalElectricalWorking at heightConfined spaceMobile equipment
Text

Deficiency Detail

OptionalShows if Result equals Fail
File Upload

Photo Evidence

OptionalShows if Result equals Fail
Single Choice

Fixed On The Spot

OptionalShows if Result equals Fail
YesNo
Text

Finding ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Fixed On The Spot equals No

Raise a finding record where this needs tracking to closure.

Links to FDN-015 Finding ID

Result

15 fields
Numeric Answer

Items Assessed*

Excludes anything marked N/A.

Numeric Answer

Items Failed*

Numeric Answer

Score Percent*

Scored

Calculated on submission. High is good. N/A items leave the denominator.

Single Choice

Result Band*

Scored
  • Pass3 pts
  • Caution1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
Numeric Answer

Completeness Percent*

How much of the template was actually answered. A high score on a half completed form is not a high score.

Single Choice

Any Task Not Completed*

Scored
  • No3 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Text

Reason Not Completed

OptionalShows if Any Task Not Completed equals Yes
Single Choice

Corrective Work Required*

Scored
  • No3 pts
  • Yes1 pt
Text

Corrective Work Order ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Corrective Work Required equals Yes

Links to MNT-002 Work Order ID

Single Choice

Equipment Fit For Service*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • With restrictions1 pt
  • No0 pts
Date & Time

Next Due*

Users

Technician*

Signature

Signature*

Users

Area Owner*

Signature

Second Signature*

MNT-023 · record IDs look like PM-2026-000 · Links Asset, PM Plan

Open in Knowella

Run it with agents

From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself

The check itself is a fixed set of questions. Catching a Partial that never converts to a Fail, or a Corrective Work Order ID left blank, needs something watching the pattern across weeks, not just the single record.

KnowMaintain

Holds the weekly checklist against the Asset register and PM Plan, escalates a Partial repeated on the same item to a required finding, and keeps corrective work orders linked back to the check that raised them.

KnowSafe

Rolls Element Tag findings from Safety devices into the same hazard view used across guarding, PPE and isolation templates, surfacing a recurring interlock or guard issue before it becomes an incident.

KnowQuality

Tracks Completeness Percent alongside Score Percent across the fleet, flagging sites where safety-device items are being answered without a genuine functional test.

Ella
Ella

Coordinates the technician's weekly round, surfaces open corrective work and repeated Partials in one view for the shift lead, and holds every write for approval before it touches a record.

This template lives in KnowMaintain — asset maintenance. Work orders, planned maintenance, calibration, reliability and shutdowns.

Meet KnowMaintain→

Glossary

Weekly PM Checklist definitions and key terms

Function-tested
Verified by actually operating the device — triggering an interlock, pressing an emergency stop — rather than confirmed only by visual inspection.
Knockout item
A field whose Fail answer overrides the rest of the checklist and drives the asset's fitness result, regardless of other scores.
Corrective work order
A separate, trackable job record raised from a checklist finding that needs parts, isolation or scheduled downtime to resolve.
Element Tag
A hazard-type label applied to a Fail finding so it can be aggregated with matching findings from other checklists and templates.
Equipment Fit For Service, with restrictions
A conditional fitness result meaning the asset can keep running only under a named limitation, which should be traceable to a linked corrective record.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about weekly pm checklist

Who should complete the weekly PM checklist?+

The technician assigned to the asset for that week's cycle, not whoever happens to be free — the checklist assumes continuity so Partial trends on the same item get noticed.

How is this different from the Daily PM Checklist?+

It covers slower-cycle mechanical and safety items — drives, transmission, cleaning, access, safety devices — rather than the fast visual and level checks the daily checklist is scoped to.

Does every Fail need a corrective work order?+

Most do, since weekly items typically need isolation, parts or scheduled downtime. Fixed On The Spot is reserved for genuinely trivial corrections made during the visit itself.

Why should Partial be rare on safety devices?+

Interlocks, emergency stops and pull cords are pass/fail by design — either the device interrupts the machine as intended or it does not. A recurring Partial on these usually signals an untested device, not a half-working one.

What happens if Interlocks Function or Emergency Stops Function fails?+

It is a knockout result: Equipment Fit For Service is pulled off Yes and Corrective Work Required should follow, since these are safety-critical devices, not routine wear items.

How does this checklist connect to the Asset register and PM Plan?+

Asset ID and PM Plan ID link back to their source records, so weekly results roll up against the plan and the asset's own maintenance history.

Keep going

Related templates and programmes

Siddarth Singh

Written and reviewed by

Siddarth Singh

Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella

Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.

  • Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
  • MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
  • MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
  • Six Sigma Black Belt
Verify with BCSP →

Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:

  • ISO 55001 cl.8.2 — Operational planning and control
  • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998, regs. 5 and 11 — Maintenance and guarding
  • OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 — Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout)

This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.

Start in Minutes, Not Weeks

Launch a Ready-Made Template and Customize It Your Way

Every template is fully editable. Adjust fields, workflows, and branding to match your processes, then deploy to your team instantly.