What this is
What is a daily production report?
What is a daily production report?
A daily production report is the single end-of-day record that reconciles output, attainment, losses and quality events across every line running that day. It replaces the habit of chasing the same numbers separately from the MES, the scale and a supervisor's notebook. The production manager owns it, and it is meant to exist before the morning meeting starts, not be assembled during it.
What is attainment, and how does it differ from OEE?
Attainment is actual output measured against planned output for the day, expressed as a percentage. It says nothing about why the gap exists — that is the job of the loss fields and, at a finer grain, the Rate and OEE Review. A site can hit 95% attainment while quietly absorbing changeover time nobody logged.
Why is this report a singleton rather than one record per shift?
The template is configured once per workspace, in the same way a register is set up once and then populated. A new record is raised against that configuration for each reporting day, which keeps the ID sequence, the tier board linkage and the scoring model consistent across every day the report runs, rather than each site inventing its own version.
Scope
When is a daily production report required?
This report closes out the day: it does not clear a line, execute an order or time a changeover, and using it for any of those jobs produces a record nobody downstream can act on.
Use this template when
- The production day has ended, or is about to, and every line's numbers need pulling into one place
- The workspace is being set up and this report needs to exist before the first Production Control cycle runs
- You are running the Production Control programme and this report is the step that closes the loop on output, losses and quality for the day
- The Tier Board Review or Shift Handover needs this record to exist so it can reference the report ID rather than restate the numbers
- A loss, hold or incident happened during the day and needs summarising here even though it was already logged in detail elsewhere
Do not use it for
- Line Clearance Record, which confirms a line is clear of the previous product, its packaging and its paperwork before the next one starts.
- Production Order Record, which records the execution of a single production order — quantities, materials consumed, yield and where it went.
- Downtime Log, which captures each stoppage as it happens, with a reason code and a duration, rather than a single totalled figure at day's end.
- Rate and OEE Review, which breaks attainment down into availability, performance and quality to explain why the day's number is what it is.
- Anything outside KnowOps, which belongs in the workspace that owns that process.
Compliance mapping
Which ISO 9001 cl.9.1 requirements does this satisfy?
ISO 9001 cl.9.1 requires monitoring and measurement to be planned, performed and evaluated with results fit to drive action — the clauses below map onto the sections that make that real for a single production day.
| Clause | Requirement | Where it lands |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001 cl.9.1.1 | The organisation determines what needs to be monitored and measured, and evaluates production performance | Header |
| ISO 9001 cl.9.1.1 | Monitoring results are analysed using consistent methods so attainment is comparable day to day | Output |
| ISO 9001 cl.9.1.3 | Data on losses is analysed by reason, not just totalled, to drive improvement action | Losses |
| ISO 9001 cl.9.1.1 | Monitoring extends to quality performance and safety events arising during production, not output alone | Quality and safety |
| ISO 9001 cl.7.5.1 | Documented information — the report itself — is retained as evidence that monitoring took place | Outcome |
| ISO 9001 cl.10.2.1 | Where a nonconformity or an unresolved loss is found, corrective action is raised and referenced | Outcome |
| ISO 9001 cl.9.1.1 | Results feed into the daily management review (the tier board) rather than sitting in the report alone | Outcome |
What it does not cover
- Total Actual Output recorded without the underlying line figures, which lets the header's attainment percentage stand without traceability to what actually happened line by line.
- Downtime totalled without reason codes, which produces a number for the tier board but nothing anyone can act on tomorrow.
- Figures Agree With The System marked Yes without reconciliation evidence, which is the exact gap that makes the day's numbers disagree with the other places productivity is tracked.
- Report issued after the morning meeting with no explanation captured, which means the meeting ran on stale or reconstructed numbers and nobody can tell which.
- Action Required marked Yes with no CAPA ID entered, which leaves an open issue with no record of anyone tracking it.
Global
Daily Production Report requirements by country
Daily production reporting is not itself a regulated document in most industries, but the record-integrity expectations sitting underneath it are, and they get stricter the closer the product is to food, drug or medical device.
ISO 9001 cl.9.1 and cl.7.5
Monitoring and measurement results must be evaluated and retained as documented information — a report rebuilt from memory every morning is evidence of a control that is not actually operating.
Auditors reading a report issued after the meeting it feeds, or one that cannot show reconciliation, treat it as an ineffective monitoring process rather than a paperwork quirk.
FDA 21 CFR Part 117 (food) / Part 211 (drugs)
Production and process records must be created contemporaneously with the work they describe, not reconstructed the next morning from systems that disagree.
A daily report assembled by hand after the fact, with no clear link back to the underlying line data, is the pattern FDA investigators are trained to probe first.
EU GMP Chapter 4 — Documentation
Records must be made or completed at the time each action is taken, and must allow the history of a production run to be traced.
Where this report is the only surviving trace of a day's losses, gaps in the reason-code fields become gaps in traceability, not just gaps in reporting.
How to complete it
How to complete a daily production report, step by step
Filling in every field is mechanical. Deciding whether the resulting report actually holds up under scrutiny comes down to a handful of judgement calls the template itself cannot make.
Figures Agree With The System is a single Yes/No tick. Whether that means someone re-ran the MES export and matched it line by line, or just recalled a number that felt about right, is a judgement the production manager makes silently every day — and it is the difference between a reconciled figure and an assumed one.
Largest Loss Identified assumes losses have already been categorised consistently enough to rank them. On a day with several mid-sized losses and no clean top entry, someone has to decide whether to force a single answer or flag the ranking itself as unreliable.
Issued Before The Morning Meeting failing once is a scheduling slip. Failing most days is evidence the report cannot actually be built from the source systems in the time available, and chasing the same person harder will not fix that.
The template shows a CAPA ID field only once Action Required is Yes, but nothing forces that ID to point at a live record. Deciding whether an unresolved issue gets a tracked corrective action or just a name in a text box determines whether it survives past tomorrow's report.
What auditors find
Most common daily production report findings
The failure modes below are the ones that show up repeatedly once a site has been running this report for a few months, not theoretical gaps.
| Finding | Clause | What fixes it |
|---|---|---|
| Attainment is entered and signed off before the underlying output figures are reconciled to the system of record. | ISO 9001 cl.9.1.1 | Require Figures Agree With The System to be answered before Attainment Percent can be entered, not after. |
| Downtime and waste are totalled as single figures with no reason breakdown, so the same loss recurs unaddressed. | ISO 9001 cl.9.1.3 | Make the reason-code breakdown a required attachment or linked record whenever downtime exceeds a set threshold, rather than trusting the Yes/No tick alone. |
| The report is routinely issued after the morning meeting rather than before it. | ISO 9001 cl.7.5.1 | Move the cut-off time for source-system data earlier, or shorten the reporting day, rather than accepting late issue as normal. |
| Action Required is marked Yes with no CAPA ID and no owner captured. | ISO 9001 cl.10.2.1 | Block sign-off on Action Required = Yes until both CAPA ID and Action Owner are populated. |
| Quality holds and complaints are logged as a single Yes/No with no reference to the record that actually describes them. | ISO 9001 cl.9.1.1 | Require a reference number — hold ID, complaint ID — whenever Quality Holds Raised or Complaints Received is Yes. |
| The Tier Board ID field is left blank even when Feeds Tier Board Review is marked Yes, breaking the link between the two records. | ISO 9001 cl.7.5.3 | Make Tier Board ID required whenever Feeds Tier Board Review is Yes, and validate it against an existing review record. |
Case in point
Case in point: the attainment number that meant three different things in one week
A site running two shifts a day had one person building the daily production report from the MES export, another building it from the scheduler when the MES was down, and a third filling it in from memory on the Monday after a long weekend. All three passed Figures Agree With The System as Yes. None of the three attainment percentages agreed with each other, and the tier board spent three separate meetings arguing about which number was real.
The fix was not a new field — it was making Figures Agree With The System mean something specific: a named reconciliation step against one system, done before the number goes in, not after. Once that was enforced, the argument moved from 'whose number is right' to the actual losses behind the gap, which is what the report was supposed to surface in the first place.
The template
The template, field by field
The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.
5 sections
- Reference
- OPS-012
- Archetype
- Report
- Record ID
- DPR-2026-000
- Scoring
- Attainment
- Direction
- High is good
- Singleton
- Yes
- Basis
- ISO 9001 cl.9.1
- Links
- Feeds Tier Board Review and Shift Handover
- Tags
- Production, Reporting
- Sections
- 5
- Fields
- 50
- Follow up fields
- 3
- Repeating sections
- 0
- Links out
- 3
Header
13 fieldsReport ID*
Auto sequence. Format DPR-2026-000.
The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.
Status*
Drives who this goes to next.
- Planned2 pts
- In progress2 pts
- Complete3 pts
- Deferred0 pts
- Open0 pts
- Closed3 pts
- Overdue0 pts
Date and Time*
Completed By*
Site*
Site ID*
Format SITE-000.
Links to FDN-001 Site ID
Reporting Day*
Prepared By*
Lines Running*
Total Planned Output*
Total Actual Output*
Attainment Percent*
Rebuilt By Hand Every Morning
The morning meeting runs on this report, and on most sites somebody spends an hour before it assembling numbers from four places that do not agree.
Output
6 fieldsEvery Line Reported*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Attainment Calculated Consistently*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Orders Completed As Planned*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Orders Carried Forward*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Short Runs And Trials Included*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Figures Agree With The System*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Losses
6 fieldsDowntime Totalled By Reason*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Waste Totalled By Reason*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Labour Hours Against Plan*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Changeover Time Included*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Material Variance Included*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Largest Loss Identified*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Quality and safety
6 fieldsQuality Holds Raised*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Complaints Received*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Incidents Or Near Misses*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Escalations Unresolved*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Contractors On Site*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Anything Carried Into Tomorrow*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Outcome
19 fieldsReport Complete*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Issued Before The Morning Meeting*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Main Issue Of The Day
Feeds Tier Board Review*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Tier Board ID
Links to OPS-014 Review ID
Figures Reconciled To The System*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Items Assessed*
Excludes anything marked N/A.
Items Failed*
Score Percent*
Calculated on submission. High is good. N/A items leave the denominator.
Result Band*
- Pass3 pts
- Caution1 pt
- Fail0 pts
Completeness Percent*
How much of the template was actually answered. A high score on a half completed form is not a high score.
Action Required*
Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.
- No2 pts
- Yes0 pts
Priority
- High0 pts
- Medium1 pt
- Low3 pts
CAPA ID
Format CAPA-2026-00000.
Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID
Action Owner
Production Manager*
Signature*
Site Manager*
Second Signature*
OPS-012 · record IDs look like DPR-2026-000 · Feeds Tier Board Review and Shift Handover
Open in KnowellaRun it with agents
From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself
The form itself is the easy part. Getting the report issued before the meeting, keeping the Tier Board link populated, and making sure an open action doesn't quietly disappear is the work that actually slips.
Holds the daily production report against the site register, chases the report before the meeting cut-off, and keeps the Tier Board and Shift Handover links populated automatically.
Picks up every quality hold and complaint flagged Yes on the report and checks it against the record that actually describes it, rather than letting a tick stand in for the detail.
Cross-checks downtime totals against logged maintenance events so a reason code on this report matches what maintenance actually recorded, instead of two different stories of the same stoppage.

Rolls attainment, open actions and unresolved escalations across every site into one view for the morning meeting, and holds every write back to a record for your approval first.
This template lives in KnowOps — frontline execution. Shift handover, production control, daily management, worker lifecycle and improvement.
Meet KnowOps→Glossary
Daily Production Report definitions and key terms
- Attainment
- Actual output measured against planned output for the reporting period, usually expressed as a percentage. It is a headline figure, not an explanation.
- Reason code
- A short, standardised label attached to a loss — a downtime stoppage, a waste event — that lets the same cause be tracked and totalled across many records rather than re-described in free text each time.
- Tier board
- The short, standing daily management meeting held at a fixed level — line, area, site or executive — that reviews yesterday's numbers and sets today's priorities.
- Singleton template
- A template configured once per workspace rather than duplicated per event; new records are raised against that single configuration as the day-to-day work happens.
- Carried forward
- An item — an order, an issue, an action — that remains open at the end of the reporting period and is explicitly flagged to appear again in tomorrow's cycle rather than silently disappearing.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions about daily production report
What is the daily production report template based on?+
It is built against ISO 9001 cl.9.1, which requires monitoring and measurement results to be analysed and evaluated rather than simply collected. The report is also the documented-information record referenced in cl.7.5, and the trigger for corrective action under cl.10.2 when a loss or hold is left open.
What sections does the daily production report contain?+
There are five sections: Header, Output, Losses, Quality and safety, and Outcome. Together they hold 50 fields, 44 of which are required, ending in two signatures — production manager and site manager.
Why does the report need a signature from both the production manager and the site manager?+
The production manager owns the day-to-day figures; the site manager's signature checks that the report was actually issued before the meeting it feeds, and that any open action has a name and a date against it, not just a tick.
How is the daily production report scored?+
Scoring is attainment, where high is good. But the surrounding Yes/No fields on reconciliation, reason coding and issue timing are what determine whether that attainment figure can be trusted, not just reported.
What happens if Action Required is marked Yes?+
Priority, a CAPA ID and an Action Owner become visible and are expected to be completed. The template does not force a CAPA record to exist behind that ID, so the discipline of actually raising one sits with the production manager, not the form.
Can the daily production report template be changed?+
Yes. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to Tier Board Review and Shift Handover come with it. Most sites install it as-is, run it for a reporting cycle, then tighten the reconciliation and reason-code requirements once they see where the gaps actually are.
Keep going
Related templates and programmes
Industries this is written for
Programmes this belongs to
Used together in Production Control
Work Order
The main record for a planned maintenance job, covering what, where, who and when
Line Clearance Record
Confirms a line is clear of the previous product, its packaging and its paperwork before the next one starts
Production Order Record
Records the execution of a production order, covering quantities, materials consumed, yield and where it went
Changeover Record
Times and records a changeover from last good piece to first good piece, with what was done in between
Downtime Log
Records every stop, how long it lasted and what caused it, by reason code
Scrap and Waste Record
Records material scrapped or wasted, at which step, why, and what it was worth
More in Production Control
Line Clearance Record
Confirms a line is clear of the previous product, its packaging and its paperwork before the next one starts
Production Order Record
Records the execution of a production order, covering quantities, materials consumed, yield and where it went
Changeover Record
Times and records a changeover from last good piece to first good piece, with what was done in between
Downtime Log
Records every stop, how long it lasted and what caused it, by reason code
Scrap and Waste Record
Records material scrapped or wasted, at which step, why, and what it was worth
Rate and OEE Review
Reviews availability, performance and quality for a line over a period and identifies the dominant loss

Written and reviewed by
Siddarth Singh
Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella
Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.
- Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
- MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
- MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
- Six Sigma Black Belt
Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:
- ISO 9001:2015 cl.9.1 — Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
- ISO 9001:2015 cl.7.5 — Documented information
- ISO 9001:2015 cl.10.2 — Nonconformity and corrective action
- 21 CFR Part 211.180 — Production record requirements (drugs)
This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.