What this is
What is a policy communication record?
What is a policy communication record?
It is the evidenced account of how a specific policy version was communicated: the method used, who was reached, whether contractors and agency workers were included, and whether the workforce demonstrably understood it — not just received it.
How is this different from the policy statement record itself?
The statement record judges whether the policy document is current and correctly signed. This record only starts once that judgement is already Yes — it never assesses the policy's content, only how well it reached and landed with the people it covers.
Who owns completing it?
The policy owner, typically whoever holds accountability for that specific policy area, completes it each time the policy is issued or revised, drawing on whoever ran the briefings, inductions or toolbox talks for the detail.
Scope
When is a policy communication record required?
This record governs the act of communicating an already-current policy, and the evidence that the communication actually landed. It does not judge whether the policy's content is right — that decision belongs upstream.
Use this template when
- A new or revised policy statement has just been issued and needs to be communicated before the record is closed
- New starters are joining and the policy communication step of induction needs to be evidenced
- A periodic refresh of an existing, unchanged policy is due under the site's communication schedule
- An audit finding has raised doubt about whether workers actually understand a policy that is otherwise current
- The workspace is being set up and a baseline communication record needs to exist against the current policy version
Do not use it for
- Policy Statement Record, which holds the signed policy statement itself, its commitments and its currency — not how it reached people.
- Regulatory Inspection Record, which captures a regulator's own findings, not internal evidence of communication.
- Management Review Record, which is where trends in communication coverage are discussed as one input, not where the underlying evidence is captured.
- Context and Interested Parties Review, which identifies who the interested parties are, but is not where their receipt of the policy gets logged.
- Anything outside KnowComply, which belongs to the workspace that owns that operational process
Compliance mapping
Which ISO 45001 cl.7.4 requirements does this satisfy?
The clause map below ties the record's method, reach and understanding checks to specific ISO 45001 communication and awareness requirements, rather than one blanket "communicated: yes" judgement.
| Clause | Requirement | Where it lands |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.1 | Organisation determines what needs to be communicated, when, to whom and by which method | Header |
| ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.2 | Internal communication of relevant OH&S information, including changes to the policy, across levels and functions | Methods used |
| ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.1 | Communication method takes account of diverse needs, including language and literacy | Methods used |
| ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.1 | Communication considers diverse groups within the workforce, including contractors and non-permanent workers | Reach |
| ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.3 | External communication to interested parties, established and implemented by the organisation as determined by its own process | Reach |
| ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.3(a) | Workers are made aware of the OH&S policy | Understanding |
| ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.3(b)-(c) | Workers are aware of their contribution to OH&S performance and the implications of not conforming with system requirements | Understanding |
| ISO 45001:2018 cl.9.1.1 | Organisation monitors and evaluates OH&S performance, including the effectiveness of its processes such as communication | Outcome |
What it does not cover
- A toolbox talk logged as delivered with no attendee list behind it, which leaves no way to establish who was actually in the room.
- Agency workers marked as covered because the agency itself was emailed once, which does not establish that the individual workers ever saw or understood anything.
- A policy pinned to a noticeboard nobody reads, which the record's own Info field names directly as the most common false positive in this area.
- A Coverage Percent of 100 recorded with no matching figure for people not yet reached, which cannot be reconciled against headcount and should not be taken at face value.
- Understanding marked as adequate with no spot check evidence behind it, which is a manager's impression, not a checked outcome.
Global
Policy Communication Record requirements by country
ISO 45001's communication clause applies uniformly wherever the certification is held, but the workforce composition that most stresses it varies by jurisdiction.
Framework Directive 89/391/EEC, Art.10 (worker information) alongside ISO 45001 cl.7.4
EU member states carry a statutory duty for employers to inform workers of risks in a form and language they understand, independent of the ISO clause.
A multilingual site cannot rely on the ISO audit alone to catch a language gap — it is also a direct statutory exposure under national implementing law.
Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, reg.10, alongside ISO 45001 cl.7.4
UK regulation specifically extends the duty to inform to employees of other employers working on site, which is exactly the contractor and agency-worker gap this record is built to catch.
Contractors Included and Agency Workers Included are not optional extras on a UK site — they track a distinct statutory duty, not just good ISO practice.
ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4, verified via accredited third-party audit
Auditors typically test this clause by interviewing workers directly rather than reading the record, so a strong-looking coverage figure that does not match what workers can actually describe becomes a nonconformity on the spot.
The record's real test is whether its Understanding section would survive a worker interview, not whether the Methods Used section looks complete on paper.
How to complete it
How to complete a policy communication record, step by step
The fields are straightforward to fill in. What actually determines whether the record holds up is a handful of judgement calls about what counts as genuine coverage.
A briefing marked delivered needs an attendee trail behind it. Without one, the field records that an activity was scheduled, not that the policy reached anyone — and the two should not be scored the same.
Marking Contractors Included or Agency Workers Included as Yes on the basis that the agency or contract manager was told, rather than the individuals on site, reproduces exactly the gap the Reach section was split out to catch.
Understanding Spot Checked as Yes should mean a specific method was used — a toolbox question, a short quiz, direct observation — logged well enough that someone else could repeat it. A general sense that "people seemed to get it" is not evidence.
People Not Yet Reached being non-zero does not automatically demand an action record, but leaving Follow Up Planned as anything other than Yes or Not needed while a gap remains open quietly defers the problem past the next audit.
What auditors find
Most common policy communication record findings
These are the failure patterns that recur across sites running this record, mapped to the clause they break and the fix that actually clears them.
| Finding | Clause | What fixes it |
|---|---|---|
| Briefing marked delivered with no attendee record to evidence who was present | ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.2 | Capture names, roles and the communication date before setting Briefing Delivered to Yes |
| Contractors present on site marked as Not Applicable rather than genuinely assessed | ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.1 / cl.7.4.3 | Confirm actual contractor presence against the site roster and correct to Yes or No, re-communicating if No |
| No translated version issued for a workforce with a material non-English-speaking population | ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.1 | Commission translation, reissue and log a new Communication Date once distributed |
| Coverage Percent and People Not Yet Reached do not reconcile against actual site headcount | ISO 45001:2018 cl.9.1.1 | Recalculate both figures from the current roster rather than carrying forward a prior cycle's numbers |
| Understanding Spot Checked marked Yes with no method or evidence recorded against it | ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.3 | Define and log a specific spot-check method, and repeat it before the field is set to Yes again next cycle |
| Understanding Adequate marked Partly with Follow Up Planned left blank | ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.3 | Require a follow-up plan or an explicit Not Needed justification whenever understanding is not fully adequate |
Case in point
Case in point: the agency workers nobody had actually briefed
A logistics site reported 100% coverage on its policy communication record for three consecutive cycles. A new HSE lead ran an informal check on the warehouse floor and found that agency staff — roughly a third of the shift on any given day — had never seen the policy or attended an induction session covering it; only the agency's account manager had been emailed a copy.
The coverage figure was corrected downward, Agency Workers Included flipped from Yes to No, and a standing induction slot was added specifically for agency starters before their first shift. The record's next cycle showed a genuine, evidenced number instead of an assumed one — smaller, but defensible.
The template
The template, field by field
The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.
5 sections
- Reference
- CMP-049
- Archetype
- Record
- Record ID
- PCR-2026-000
- Scoring
- Coverage percent
- Direction
- High is good
- Singleton
- Yes
- Basis
- ISO 45001 cl.7.4
- Links
- Links Policy statement, Induction
- Tags
- Policy, Communication
- Sections
- 5
- Fields
- 45
- Follow up fields
- 3
- Repeating sections
- 0
- Links out
- 2
Header
13 fieldsRecord ID*
Auto sequence. Format PCR-2026-000.
The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.
Status*
Drives who this goes to next.
- Planned2 pts
- In progress2 pts
- Complete3 pts
- Deferred0 pts
- Open0 pts
- Closed3 pts
- Overdue0 pts
Date and Time*
Completed By*
Site*
Site ID*
Format SITE-000.
Links to FDN-001 Site ID
Policy*
Version*
Communication Trigger*
Owner*
Communication Date*
People In Scope*
Displayed Is Not Communicated
A policy on a wall satisfies nobody. Auditors ask a worker what it means, and the answer is what gets recorded.
Methods used
6 fieldsBriefing Delivered*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Included In Induction*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Displayed At Key Locations*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Issued Digitally*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Discussed At Team Meetings*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Available In Needed Languages*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Reach
6 fieldsAll Shifts Covered*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- Day shift only0 pts
Contractors Included*
- Yes3 pts
- Not applicable3 pts
- No0 pts
Agency Workers Included*
- Yes3 pts
- No0 pts
Remote Or Mobile Workers Included*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Interested Parties Provided On Request*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Acknowledgement Collected Where Needed*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Understanding
6 fieldsMeaning Explained Not Just Read*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Relevance To Their Job Explained*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Questions Invited*
- Yes3 pts
- No0 pts
Understanding Spot Checked*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Workers Can Describe The Commitments*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Gaps Identified And Addressed*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Outcome
14 fieldsCoverage Percent*
Understanding Adequate*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
People Not Yet Reached*
Follow Up Planned*
- Yes3 pts
- Not needed3 pts
- No0 pts
Feeds Management Review*
- Yes3 pts
- Partly1 pt
- No0 pts
Next Communication Due
Action Required*
Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.
- No2 pts
- Yes0 pts
Priority
- High0 pts
- Medium1 pt
- Low3 pts
CAPA ID
Format CAPA-2026-00000.
Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID
Action Owner
Policy Owner*
Signature*
Compliance Lead*
Second Signature*
CMP-049 · record IDs look like PCR-2026-000 · Links Policy statement, Induction
Open in KnowellaRun it with agents
From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself
Running a briefing is easy to schedule. Proving contractors, agency staff and remote workers were actually in it — and understood it — is the part that depends on someone checking the population, not just the method.
Tracks which policy version each communication record is against, flags cycles missing an attendee trail, and rolls coverage gaps forward until they are closed.
Supplies the current site headcount and contractor/agency population this record's coverage figure needs to be checked against, so Coverage Percent isn't self-reported.
Handles the induction and toolbox-talk delivery this record depends on, keeping attendee records ready to evidence Briefing Delivered and Included In Induction.

Flags cycles where the reach figures don't reconcile with roster data, drafts the follow-up plan for review, and holds every write for your approval before it touches a record.
This template lives in KnowComply — audit and governance. Audit programmes, legal register, management review, risk and certification.
Meet KnowComply→Glossary
Policy Communication Record definitions and key terms
- Internal communication
- Communication of relevant OH&S information among the organisation's own levels and functions, including any change to the policy — distinct from communication reaching contractors or the public.
- External communication
- Communication with parties outside the organisation, such as contractors, visitors or regulators, carried out according to a process the organisation itself has established.
- Coverage
- The proportion of the relevant population that has demonstrably received the communication, as opposed to the proportion the method was merely aimed at.
- Spot check
- A targeted, repeatable check of a sample of the workforce to confirm understanding, used because asking everyone is impractical but asking nobody proves nothing.
- Communication trigger
- The event that requires a new communication cycle to run — a new policy version, new starters joining, a scheduled periodic refresh, or a finding raised after an audit.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions about policy communication record
Does every minor policy revision need a full new communication cycle?+
It depends on the significance of the change. A wording clarification may only need a brief note at the next team meeting, while a change to commitments or scope generally needs the fuller briefing-and-check cycle this record is built around.
Is displaying the policy on a noticeboard ever sufficient on its own?+
No. The template's own Info field states this directly — display satisfies visibility, not communication. It can be one method among several, but never the only one recorded.
How is Coverage Percent supposed to be calculated?+
Against the actual in-scope population for that communication cycle, including contractors and agency workers where they are in scope, not against permanent headcount alone.
What if the site has no contractors or agency workers at all?+
Contractors Included can be marked Not Applicable in that case, but only where it reflects genuine site composition — not as a default used to avoid checking.
Who should carry out the understanding spot check?+
Typically a supervisor or the policy owner, using a consistent method each cycle so results can be compared over time rather than depending on who happened to ask.
Does this record need to be redone every time someone new joins?+
New starters are usually covered through the induction communication trigger and logged as part of that cycle's reach, rather than reopening a fresh record for each individual.
Keep going
Related templates and programmes
Industries this is written for
Programmes this belongs to
Used together in Management System Governance
Legal and Other Requirements Register
Lists every law, regulation, permit and commitment that applies to your operation
Compliance Obligation Assessment
Assesses how each legal requirement applies to you and what you do to meet it
Compliance Evaluation Record
Records the periodic evaluation of whether you actually comply with each obligation
Regulatory Change Record
Records a change in law or regulation and what it means for you
Regulatory Inspection Record
Records a visit by a regulator, including what was inspected, what was said and any orders issued
Management Review Record
Records the periodic review of the management system by senior leadership, covering performance, risks, resources and improvement

Written and reviewed by
Siddarth Singh
Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella
Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.
- Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
- MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
- MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
- Six Sigma Black Belt
Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:
- ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4 — Communication
- ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.3 — Awareness
- Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, reg.10 (UK)
- Framework Directive 89/391/EEC, Art.10 (EU)
This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.