Knowella

Policy Communication Record

A policy is easy to publish and hard to actually communicate. The recurring failure is treating display as delivery: a noticeboard copy, one induction slide, an email nobody opened, all logged as "communicated" with no evidence anyone understood it. Contractors and agency workers are where this breaks first — covered by the policy, absent from the briefing, and invisible in the coverage figure until someone finally asks them directly.

KnowComplyRecordCMP-04945 fields across 5 sectionsFull researchSee the form

Reviewed by Siddarth SinghCSPLast reviewed 16 August 2026

Basis
ISO 45001 cl.7.4
Workspace
KnowComply
Form type
Record
Completion trigger
On issue of a new policy version and on every revision
Completed by
Owned by the policy owner

The short version

  • This record exists because "communicated" and "displayed" are routinely treated as the same thing, and only one of them satisfies the standard.
  • Coverage is measured on two independent axes — the method used and the population reached — because a good method reaching the wrong population still fails.
  • Contractors, agency workers and remote or mobile staff are scored as separate fields precisely because they are the groups most often silently excluded from a coverage figure that otherwise looks complete.
  • Understanding is checked separately from delivery: a briefing delivered with no spot check behind it is an assumption, not an evidenced outcome.

What this is

What is a policy communication record?

What is a policy communication record?

It is the evidenced account of how a specific policy version was communicated: the method used, who was reached, whether contractors and agency workers were included, and whether the workforce demonstrably understood it — not just received it.

How is this different from the policy statement record itself?

The statement record judges whether the policy document is current and correctly signed. This record only starts once that judgement is already Yes — it never assesses the policy's content, only how well it reached and landed with the people it covers.

Who owns completing it?

The policy owner, typically whoever holds accountability for that specific policy area, completes it each time the policy is issued or revised, drawing on whoever ran the briefings, inductions or toolbox talks for the detail.

Scope

When is a policy communication record required?

This record governs the act of communicating an already-current policy, and the evidence that the communication actually landed. It does not judge whether the policy's content is right — that decision belongs upstream.

Use this template when

  • A new or revised policy statement has just been issued and needs to be communicated before the record is closed
  • New starters are joining and the policy communication step of induction needs to be evidenced
  • A periodic refresh of an existing, unchanged policy is due under the site's communication schedule
  • An audit finding has raised doubt about whether workers actually understand a policy that is otherwise current
  • The workspace is being set up and a baseline communication record needs to exist against the current policy version

Do not use it for

  • Policy Statement Record, which holds the signed policy statement itself, its commitments and its currency — not how it reached people.
  • Regulatory Inspection Record, which captures a regulator's own findings, not internal evidence of communication.
  • Management Review Record, which is where trends in communication coverage are discussed as one input, not where the underlying evidence is captured.
  • Context and Interested Parties Review, which identifies who the interested parties are, but is not where their receipt of the policy gets logged.
  • Anything outside KnowComply, which belongs to the workspace that owns that operational process

Compliance mapping

Which ISO 45001 cl.7.4 requirements does this satisfy?

The clause map below ties the record's method, reach and understanding checks to specific ISO 45001 communication and awareness requirements, rather than one blanket "communicated: yes" judgement.

ClauseRequirementWhere it lands
ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.1Organisation determines what needs to be communicated, when, to whom and by which methodHeader
ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.2Internal communication of relevant OH&S information, including changes to the policy, across levels and functionsMethods used
ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.1Communication method takes account of diverse needs, including language and literacyMethods used
ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.1Communication considers diverse groups within the workforce, including contractors and non-permanent workersReach
ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.3External communication to interested parties, established and implemented by the organisation as determined by its own processReach
ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.3(a)Workers are made aware of the OH&S policyUnderstanding
ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.3(b)-(c)Workers are aware of their contribution to OH&S performance and the implications of not conforming with system requirementsUnderstanding
ISO 45001:2018 cl.9.1.1Organisation monitors and evaluates OH&S performance, including the effectiveness of its processes such as communicationOutcome

What it does not cover

  • A toolbox talk logged as delivered with no attendee list behind it, which leaves no way to establish who was actually in the room.
  • Agency workers marked as covered because the agency itself was emailed once, which does not establish that the individual workers ever saw or understood anything.
  • A policy pinned to a noticeboard nobody reads, which the record's own Info field names directly as the most common false positive in this area.
  • A Coverage Percent of 100 recorded with no matching figure for people not yet reached, which cannot be reconciled against headcount and should not be taken at face value.
  • Understanding marked as adequate with no spot check evidence behind it, which is a manager's impression, not a checked outcome.

Global

Policy Communication Record requirements by country

ISO 45001's communication clause applies uniformly wherever the certification is held, but the workforce composition that most stresses it varies by jurisdiction.

European Union

Framework Directive 89/391/EEC, Art.10 (worker information) alongside ISO 45001 cl.7.4

EU member states carry a statutory duty for employers to inform workers of risks in a form and language they understand, independent of the ISO clause.

A multilingual site cannot rely on the ISO audit alone to catch a language gap — it is also a direct statutory exposure under national implementing law.

United Kingdom

Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, reg.10, alongside ISO 45001 cl.7.4

UK regulation specifically extends the duty to inform to employees of other employers working on site, which is exactly the contractor and agency-worker gap this record is built to catch.

Contractors Included and Agency Workers Included are not optional extras on a UK site — they track a distinct statutory duty, not just good ISO practice.

International (IAF-accredited certification)

ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4, verified via accredited third-party audit

Auditors typically test this clause by interviewing workers directly rather than reading the record, so a strong-looking coverage figure that does not match what workers can actually describe becomes a nonconformity on the spot.

The record's real test is whether its Understanding section would survive a worker interview, not whether the Methods Used section looks complete on paper.

How to complete it

How to complete a policy communication record, step by step

The fields are straightforward to fill in. What actually determines whether the record holds up is a handful of judgement calls about what counts as genuine coverage.

What counts as "communicated" versus merely issued

A briefing marked delivered needs an attendee trail behind it. Without one, the field records that an activity was scheduled, not that the policy reached anyone — and the two should not be scored the same.

How thin the contractor and agency-worker evidence can be

Marking Contractors Included or Agency Workers Included as Yes on the basis that the agency or contract manager was told, rather than the individuals on site, reproduces exactly the gap the Reach section was split out to catch.

Whether a spot check needs a defined method or a manager's impression will do

Understanding Spot Checked as Yes should mean a specific method was used — a toolbox question, a short quiz, direct observation — logged well enough that someone else could repeat it. A general sense that "people seemed to get it" is not evidence.

When a coverage gap becomes an action versus a note for next time

People Not Yet Reached being non-zero does not automatically demand an action record, but leaving Follow Up Planned as anything other than Yes or Not needed while a gap remains open quietly defers the problem past the next audit.

What auditors find

Most common policy communication record findings

These are the failure patterns that recur across sites running this record, mapped to the clause they break and the fix that actually clears them.

FindingClauseWhat fixes it
Briefing marked delivered with no attendee record to evidence who was presentISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.2Capture names, roles and the communication date before setting Briefing Delivered to Yes
Contractors present on site marked as Not Applicable rather than genuinely assessedISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.1 / cl.7.4.3Confirm actual contractor presence against the site roster and correct to Yes or No, re-communicating if No
No translated version issued for a workforce with a material non-English-speaking populationISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4.1Commission translation, reissue and log a new Communication Date once distributed
Coverage Percent and People Not Yet Reached do not reconcile against actual site headcountISO 45001:2018 cl.9.1.1Recalculate both figures from the current roster rather than carrying forward a prior cycle's numbers
Understanding Spot Checked marked Yes with no method or evidence recorded against itISO 45001:2018 cl.7.3Define and log a specific spot-check method, and repeat it before the field is set to Yes again next cycle
Understanding Adequate marked Partly with Follow Up Planned left blankISO 45001:2018 cl.7.3Require a follow-up plan or an explicit Not Needed justification whenever understanding is not fully adequate

Case in point

Case in point: the agency workers nobody had actually briefed

A logistics site reported 100% coverage on its policy communication record for three consecutive cycles. A new HSE lead ran an informal check on the warehouse floor and found that agency staff — roughly a third of the shift on any given day — had never seen the policy or attended an induction session covering it; only the agency's account manager had been emailed a copy.

The coverage figure was corrected downward, Agency Workers Included flipped from Yes to No, and a standing induction slot was added specifically for agency starters before their first shift. The record's next cycle showed a genuine, evidenced number instead of an assumed one — smaller, but defensible.

The template

The template, field by field

The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.

45fields
5 sections
Reference
CMP-049
Archetype
Record
Record ID
PCR-2026-000
Scoring
Coverage percent
Direction
High is good
Singleton
Yes
Basis
ISO 45001 cl.7.4
Links
Links Policy statement, Induction
Tags
Policy, Communication
Sections
5
Fields
45
Follow up fields
3
Repeating sections
0
Links out
2
Field typesOwn ID, generated on saveCase thread and parentPick list from a registryLinked to another templateFollow up, dashed outlineScored

Header

13 fields
Text

Record ID*

Generated on save

Auto sequence. Format PCR-2026-000.

The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.

Single Choice

Status*

Scored

Drives who this goes to next.

  • Planned2 pts
  • In progress2 pts
  • Complete3 pts
  • Deferred0 pts
  • Open0 pts
  • Closed3 pts
  • Overdue0 pts
Date & Time

Date and Time*

Users

Completed By*

Pick List

Site*

From FDN-001 Site NameFilter: Status is Active
Text

Site ID*

Linked

Format SITE-000.

Links to FDN-001 Site ID

Text

Policy*

Text

Version*

Single Choice

Communication Trigger*

New versionNew startersPeriodicAfter an audit finding
Users

Owner*

Date & Time

Communication Date*

Numeric Answer

People In Scope*

Scored
Info

Displayed Is Not Communicated

A policy on a wall satisfies nobody. Auditors ask a worker what it means, and the answer is what gets recorded.

Methods used

6 fields
Single Choice

Briefing Delivered*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Included In Induction*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Displayed At Key Locations*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Issued Digitally*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Discussed At Team Meetings*

Scored
  • Yes2 pts
  • No0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Available In Needed Languages*

Scored
  • Yes2 pts
  • No0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator

Reach

6 fields
Single Choice

All Shifts Covered*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • Day shift only0 pts
Single Choice

Contractors Included*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Not applicable3 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Agency Workers Included*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Remote Or Mobile Workers Included*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Interested Parties Provided On Request*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Acknowledgement Collected Where Needed*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts

Understanding

6 fields
Single Choice

Meaning Explained Not Just Read*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Relevance To Their Job Explained*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Questions Invited*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Understanding Spot Checked*

Scored
  • Yes2 pts
  • No0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Workers Can Describe The Commitments*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Gaps Identified And Addressed*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts

Outcome

14 fields
Numeric Answer

Coverage Percent*

Scored
Single Choice

Understanding Adequate*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Numeric Answer

People Not Yet Reached*

Scored
Single Choice

Follow Up Planned*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Not needed3 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Feeds Management Review*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Date & Time

Next Communication Due

Optional
Single Choice

Action Required*

Scored

Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.

  • No2 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Priority

OptionalScoredShows if Action Required equals Yes
  • High0 pts
  • Medium1 pt
  • Low3 pts
Text

CAPA ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Action Required equals Yes

Format CAPA-2026-00000.

Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID

Users

Action Owner

OptionalShows if Action Required equals Yes
Users

Policy Owner*

Signature

Signature*

Users

Compliance Lead*

Signature

Second Signature*

CMP-049 · record IDs look like PCR-2026-000 · Links Policy statement, Induction

Open in Knowella

Run it with agents

From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself

Running a briefing is easy to schedule. Proving contractors, agency staff and remote workers were actually in it — and understood it — is the part that depends on someone checking the population, not just the method.

KnowComply

Tracks which policy version each communication record is against, flags cycles missing an attendee trail, and rolls coverage gaps forward until they are closed.

KnowSafe

Supplies the current site headcount and contractor/agency population this record's coverage figure needs to be checked against, so Coverage Percent isn't self-reported.

KnowTrain

Handles the induction and toolbox-talk delivery this record depends on, keeping attendee records ready to evidence Briefing Delivered and Included In Induction.

Ella
Ella

Flags cycles where the reach figures don't reconcile with roster data, drafts the follow-up plan for review, and holds every write for your approval before it touches a record.

This template lives in KnowComply — audit and governance. Audit programmes, legal register, management review, risk and certification.

Meet KnowComply→

Glossary

Policy Communication Record definitions and key terms

Internal communication
Communication of relevant OH&S information among the organisation's own levels and functions, including any change to the policy — distinct from communication reaching contractors or the public.
External communication
Communication with parties outside the organisation, such as contractors, visitors or regulators, carried out according to a process the organisation itself has established.
Coverage
The proportion of the relevant population that has demonstrably received the communication, as opposed to the proportion the method was merely aimed at.
Spot check
A targeted, repeatable check of a sample of the workforce to confirm understanding, used because asking everyone is impractical but asking nobody proves nothing.
Communication trigger
The event that requires a new communication cycle to run — a new policy version, new starters joining, a scheduled periodic refresh, or a finding raised after an audit.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about policy communication record

Does every minor policy revision need a full new communication cycle?+

It depends on the significance of the change. A wording clarification may only need a brief note at the next team meeting, while a change to commitments or scope generally needs the fuller briefing-and-check cycle this record is built around.

Is displaying the policy on a noticeboard ever sufficient on its own?+

No. The template's own Info field states this directly — display satisfies visibility, not communication. It can be one method among several, but never the only one recorded.

How is Coverage Percent supposed to be calculated?+

Against the actual in-scope population for that communication cycle, including contractors and agency workers where they are in scope, not against permanent headcount alone.

What if the site has no contractors or agency workers at all?+

Contractors Included can be marked Not Applicable in that case, but only where it reflects genuine site composition — not as a default used to avoid checking.

Who should carry out the understanding spot check?+

Typically a supervisor or the policy owner, using a consistent method each cycle so results can be compared over time rather than depending on who happened to ask.

Does this record need to be redone every time someone new joins?+

New starters are usually covered through the induction communication trigger and logged as part of that cycle's reach, rather than reopening a fresh record for each individual.

Keep going

Related templates and programmes

Siddarth Singh

Written and reviewed by

Siddarth Singh

Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella

Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.

  • Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
  • MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
  • MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
  • Six Sigma Black Belt
Verify with BCSP →

Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:

  • ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.4 — Communication
  • ISO 45001:2018 cl.7.3 — Awareness
  • Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, reg.10 (UK)
  • Framework Directive 89/391/EEC, Art.10 (EU)

This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.

Start in Minutes, Not Weeks

Launch a Ready-Made Template and Customize It Your Way

Every template is fully editable. Adjust fields, workflows, and branding to match your processes, then deploy to your team instantly.