Knowella

Security Incident Report Template

Security programmes are built around the perimeter and most security incidents originate inside it. Fences, cameras, access control and visitor management address a stranger arriving, while the events that actually harm people involve customers, clients, patients, contractors, colleagues and former employees, all of whom are entitled to be there or know how to get in.

KnowSafeRecordSAF-008Pinned in navigation36 fields across 6 sectionsFull researchSee the form

Reviewed by Siddarth SinghCSPLast reviewed 16 August 2026

Basis
ISO 45001 cl.8.2
Workspace
KnowSafe
Form type
Record
Built for
Outsiders
Comes from
People with legitimate access

The short version

  • Most workplace violence involves people with a relationship to the workplace: customers, clients, patients, colleagues, former employees and domestic partners, rather than strangers.
  • Verbal aggression and threats are the highest-volume category and the leading indicator. Recording only physical events discards the warning signal.
  • Under California Labor Code 6401.9, employers covered must maintain a violent incident log with defined fields, a written prevention plan and annual training.
  • Record potential severity alongside outcome. An aggressive encounter that ended without contact and one that ended with a push differ by chance rather than by kind.
  • Reporting depends on the person believing something will happen. Where verbal abuse is treated as part of the job, particularly in customer-facing and healthcare roles, reporting collapses.
  • Aggregate by location, time and circumstance. Incidents cluster at specific counters, entrances, hours and interactions, and the pattern is a design finding.

What this is

What is a security incident report?

What is a security incident report?

A record of any event involving threat, violence, aggression, intrusion, theft, tampering or breach of access control, capturing what occurred, who was involved, the response, and the potential severity alongside the actual outcome.

Does it cover verbal aggression?

It should. Verbal abuse, threats and intimidation are the highest-volume category and the leading indicator for physical events. Programmes that record only physical incidents have removed most of their data and all of their early warning.

Scope

When is a security incident report required?

This records a security event. Investigation and the prevention plan sit alongside it.

Use this template when

  • Threats, verbal aggression, intimidation and physical violence, whoever is involved
  • Intrusion, trespass, tampering and breach of access control
  • Theft, including product, equipment, data and personal property
  • Events involving former employees, domestic situations brought into the workplace, and customers or visitors
  • Near misses, including situations that escalated and were defused

Do not use it for

  • The workplace violence prevention plan, which this record supports
  • Investigation and root cause analysis for significant events
  • Injury reporting, which follows where someone was hurt
  • Human resources processes concerning employee conduct
  • Information security incidents, which follow a separate regime

Compliance mapping

Which ISO 45001 cl.8.2 requirements does this satisfy?

Workplace violence obligations are emerging in specific jurisdictions and otherwise sit under general duties.

ClauseRequirementWhere it lands
California Labor Code 6401.9Workplace violence prevention plan, violent incident log with defined fields, training and record retentionNature of the incident
Labor Code 6401.9(f)Violent incident log recording date, time, location, type, circumstances and consequencesEvent
OSHA General Duty ClauseUS route for recognised workplace violence hazards absent a specific federal standardEvent
ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2Hazard identification including human factors and behaviour, and hazards from outside the organisationNature of the incident
ISO 45001 cl.8.2Emergency preparedness and response, including security scenariosResponse
ISO 45001 cl.10.2Incident investigation and corrective actionFollow up
ISO 45001 cl.5.4Worker consultation, required in developing violence prevention arrangementsFollow up
Privacy lawPersonal data restrictions where incidents involve named individuals and health informationSeverity and potential

What it does not cover

  • The workplace violence prevention plan, which this record supports.
  • Investigation and root cause analysis, for significant events.
  • Injury reporting, where someone was hurt.
  • Human resources conduct processes, which run separately.
  • Information security incident reporting, a separate regime.

How to complete it

How to complete a security incident report, step by step

Capture verbal events, record the circumstances, and aggregate before drawing conclusions about people.

Record verbal aggression and threats

These are the highest-volume category and the leading indicator for physical violence. In customer-facing, healthcare and enforcement roles they are frequently regarded as an unavoidable feature of the work, which is exactly why they go unrecorded and why the escalation pattern is invisible until something physical happens.

Record circumstances, not just the event

What preceded it: a refused request, a delay, a decision communicated, an intoxicated person, a dispute over a bill, a dismissal. Circumstances are what make incidents preventable, because they identify the interactions that generate aggression and the ones that can be redesigned.

Record potential alongside outcome

An encounter where someone was threatened and one where they were pushed frequently differ by chance rather than by anything either party controlled. Ranking by physical outcome systematically under-weights the events that came closest to serious harm, which is the same failure as in injury reporting.

Aggregate by location, time and interaction

Incidents concentrate at specific counters, entrances, times and transaction types. That clustering is a design finding: the layout of a reception, the position of a barrier, the lone hour before closing, the point at which a decision is communicated. It is invisible in individual reports and obvious in aggregate.

What auditors find

Most common security incident report findings

Security findings concentrate on what gets reported and where events cluster.

FindingClauseWhat fixes it
Only physical incidents recorded, with verbal aggression excluded.Labor Code 6401.9(f)Verbal events are the leading indicator and the largest category.
Programme built around perimeter security with no internal risk assessment.ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2Most events involve people with legitimate access.
Circumstances preceding the event not recorded.Labor Code 6401.9(f)Circumstances identify the interactions that can be redesigned.
Potential severity not recorded.ISO 45001 cl.10.2Threatened and pushed frequently differ by chance rather than by kind.
Domestic violence risk not addressed in the prevention plan.ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2The workplace is a predictable location; perimeter measures address it least well.
Verbal abuse treated as part of the job in customer-facing roles.ISO 45001 cl.5.4Where it is normalised, reporting collapses and the warning signal disappears.
No aggregation by location, time or interaction type.ISO 45001 cl.9.1Clustering is the design finding; individual reports are noise.
Former employee access not removed promptly on departure.ISO 45001 cl.8.2Access, keys, codes and credentials, on the day rather than in the next cycle.
Lone and out-of-hours workers not covered by the arrangements.ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2They face the same events with the slowest response available.
No feedback to reporters, so reporting declines.ISO 45001 cl.5.4Reporting persists only where people see something happen as a result.

Case in point

Case in point: the counter and the hour

A service operation recorded security incidents when they involved physical contact or police attendance, which amounted to a handful a year. Verbal abuse was frequent and unrecorded, on the understanding that it came with the role.

A three-month trial recording every instance of aggression, including verbal, produced a different picture. Events concentrated overwhelmingly at one counter position, in the final ninety minutes before closing, and in a specific interaction: telling someone their request could not be completed that day.

Two changes followed. The cut-off for that request type moved earlier so the conversation happened when the area was staffed and calm, and the counter layout was altered to remove a position where a member of staff could be approached from two sides. Reported aggression at that point fell substantially.

The template

The template, field by field

The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.

36fields
6 sections
Reference
SAF-008
Archetype
Record
Record ID
CASE-2026-000
Scoring
Severity band
Direction
High is bad
Singleton
No
Basis
ISO 45001 cl.8.2
Links
Feeds RCA, KnowHealth support
Tags
Incident, Security
Sections
6
Fields
36
Follow up fields
10
Repeating sections
0
Links out
5
Field typesOwn ID, generated on saveCase thread and parentPick list from a registryLinked to another templateFollow up, dashed outlineScored

Event

7 fields
Text

Case ID*

Generated on save

Auto sequence. Format CASE-2026-00000.

The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.

Single Choice

Status*

Scored

Drives who this goes to next.

  • Planned2 pts
  • In progress2 pts
  • Complete3 pts
  • Deferred0 pts
  • Open0 pts
  • Closed3 pts
  • Overdue0 pts
Info

Handling Note

Access to this record is restricted. Record what happened factually and support the people involved before anything else.

Date & Time

Date and Time of Event*

Date & Time

Date Reported*

Pick List

Reported By*

From FDN-003 Worker NameFilter: Site matches, Status is Active
Text

Person ID*

Linked

Format PER-0000.

Links to FDN-003 Person ID

Where

4 fields
Pick List

Site*

From FDN-001 Site NameFilter: Status is Active
Text

Site ID*

Linked

Format SITE-000.

Links to FDN-001 Site ID

Single Choice

Area*

The area within the site.

Cutting roomBoning hallPackingChill storeFreezerPasteurisingFillingCulture roomDespatchYardWorkshopPlant roomOffices
Location

Exact Location

Optional

Drop a pin for anything hard to find.

Nature of the incident

9 fields
Single Choice

Incident Category*

Theft, trespass, threat, physical violence, harassment or damage.

TheftTrespassVerbal threatPhysical violenceHarassmentCriminal damage
Text

Description*

Single Choice

Persons Involved Known*

YesNo
Single Choice

External Party Involved*

YesNo
Single Choice

Worker Affected*

Scored
  • No2 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Pick List

Affected Worker

OptionalFrom FDN-003 Worker NameShows if Worker Affected equals YesFilter: Site matches, Status is Active
Text

Person ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Worker Affected equals Yes

Format PER-0000.

Links to FDN-003 Person ID

Single Choice

Support Offered

OptionalScoredShows if Worker Affected equals Yes

Support is offered before any investigation begins.

  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Text

Support Referral ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Support Offered equals Yes

Links to HLT-026 Referral ID

Response

4 fields
Single Choice

Police Contacted*

YesNo, not requiredNo, worker declined
Text

Police Reference

OptionalShows if Police Contacted equals Yes
Single Choice

Access Controls Reviewed

Optional
YesNo
Single Choice

CCTV Secured

Optional

Footage overwrites quickly. Secure it the same day.

YesNoNot available

Severity and potential

6 fields
Info

Severity Guidance

Rate the potential for physical harm, not the property value. A confrontation that ended in words could have ended differently.

Single Choice

Actual Severity*

Scored
  • No injury4 pts
  • First aid3 pts
  • Medical treatment2 pts
  • Lost time1 pt
  • Fatality0 pts
Single Choice

Maximum Potential Loss*

Scored

The worst credible outcome had circumstances been slightly different.

  • Minor4 pts
  • Moderate3 pts
  • Serious2 pts
  • Fatal or catastrophic0 pts
Single Choice

Investigation Required*

Scored

Set by potential outcome, not by what actually happened.

  • No3 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Investigation Level

OptionalShows if Investigation Required equals Yes
None requiredQuick debrief5 WhyFull RCACross functional RCA
Text

RCA ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Investigation Required equals Yes

Format RCA-2026-00000.

Links to FDN-013 RCA ID

Follow up

6 fields
Single Choice

Action Required*

Scored

Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.

  • No2 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Priority

OptionalScoredShows if Action Required equals Yes
  • High0 pts
  • Medium1 pt
  • Low3 pts
Text

CAPA ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Action Required equals Yes

Format CAPA-2026-00000.

Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID

Users

Action Owner

OptionalShows if Action Required equals Yes
Users

Manager*

Signature

Signature*

SAF-008 · record IDs look like CASE-2026-000 · Feeds RCA, KnowHealth support

Open in Knowella

Run it with agents

From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself

The report captures a security event. What fails is the verbal category nobody recorded and the counter nobody aggregated.

KnowSafe

Captures verbal and physical events with circumstances and potential severity, and holds the violent incident log fields where required.

Ella
Ella

Aggregates by location, hour and interaction type, converting individual events into layout and scheduling findings.

KnowHealth

Connects incidents to support for those involved, since psychological effects follow threats as well as contact.

KnowTrain

Delivers de-escalation and response training targeted at the interactions the data shows generate aggression.

This template lives in KnowSafe — safety and compliance. Incidents, hazards, permits, inspections and the critical controls behind them.

Meet KnowSafe→

Glossary

Security Incident Report definitions and key terms

Workplace violence
Acts or threats of physical violence, harassment, intimidation or threatening disruptive behaviour occurring at the workplace.
Violent incident log
The record required under California Labor Code 6401.9 with defined fields including circumstances and consequences.
Type of violence
Classification by relationship: criminal intent, customer or client, worker on worker, and personal relationship.
Verbal aggression
Threats, abuse and intimidation without physical contact, the highest-volume category and leading indicator.
Circumstances
What preceded the event, which identifies the interactions that generate aggression.
Potential severity
How serious the event could have been, recorded alongside the physical outcome.
Prevention plan
The written plan required in some jurisdictions, covering hazard identification, response, training and review.
Clustering
Concentration of incidents by location, time or interaction type, which converts events into design findings.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about security incident report

Where does workplace violence actually come from?+

Predominantly from people with a relationship to the workplace: customers, clients, patients, colleagues, former employees and domestic partners. Perimeter security, access control and visitor management are designed around a stranger gaining entry, which is the smallest of the categories and the one most heavily addressed.

Should verbal aggression be recorded?+

Yes, and it is the most important category to record. It is the highest-volume data and the leading indicator for physical events. In customer-facing, healthcare and enforcement roles it is frequently regarded as an unavoidable part of the work, which is precisely why it goes unrecorded and why escalation patterns are invisible until something physical occurs.

What does California require?+

Under Labor Code 6401.9, covered employers must maintain a written workplace violence prevention plan, keep a violent incident log recording date, time, location, type, circumstances and consequences, provide annual training, and retain records. It is currently the most prescriptive workplace violence requirement in the US and there is no equivalent federal standard.

Why record circumstances?+

Because they are what make incidents preventable. Knowing that an assault occurred tells you little; knowing it followed a refused request, a delay, a bill dispute or a decision being communicated identifies an interaction that can be redesigned, rescheduled or moved to a different setting.

What happens to reporting when we start recording verbal events?+

Reported figures rise sharply, usually in the first year, because a category previously treated as normal begins to appear. That needs explaining to leadership before the change rather than afterwards, since a rising security incident count looks like a deteriorating situation when it reflects a widening lens.

Keep going

Related templates and programmes

Siddarth Singh

Written and reviewed by

Siddarth Singh

Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella

Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.

  • Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
  • MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
  • MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
  • Six Sigma Black Belt
Verify with BCSP →

Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:

  • California Labor Code 6401.9, workplace violence prevention
  • OSHA guidance on preventing workplace violence, including for healthcare and social service workers
  • ISO 45001:2018 clauses 6.1.2, 8.2 and 10.2
  • NIOSH occupational violence research and typology of workplace violence
  • Cal/OSHA workplace violence prevention in general industry resources

This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.

Start in Minutes, Not Weeks

Launch a Ready-Made Template and Customize It Your Way

Every template is fully editable. Adjust fields, workflows, and branding to match your processes, then deploy to your team instantly.