Knowella

Temporary and Agency Worker Review

The gap between a permanent worker and an agency worker is almost never a missing policy; it is a shortened induction, a supervisor who assumes someone else covered the basics, and a worker who will not stop a job because they can be sent home tomorrow. Its recurring failure is auditing the policy instead of the practice: confirming the procedure applies to agency staff on paper while the actual first shift looked nothing like a permanent starter's.

KnowSafeReviewSAF-152Pinned in navigation41 fields across 5 sectionsFull researchSee the form

Reviewed by Siddarth SinghCSPLast reviewed 16 August 2026

Basis
ISO 45001 cl.5.4
Workspace
KnowSafe
Form type
Review
Completed by
Safety with HR, run quarterly
Feeds
Competency matrix, agency provider assessment, corrective actions

The short version

  • The injury-rate gap for agency and temporary workers is well established across industries, and it is not explained by the work being different; it is explained by induction depth, supervision quality and willingness to speak up, which is exactly what this review tests.
  • A shortened induction is not a lesser version of the real thing; the form scores it only one band above a genuinely different one, because a worker who received less content carries less protection regardless of how the gap is described.
  • Being told they can stop unsafe work has to be explicit for someone who can be released at short notice. An implied understanding, the form's own middle option, is treated as real but incomplete, not equivalent to having been told outright.
  • Parity extends past training into the mechanics of the workplace: whether agency workers appear in the evacuation headcount, are included in toolbox talks, and are counted when the site plans who is present in an emergency.

What this is

What is a temporary and agency worker review?

What is a temporary and agency worker review?

A periodic check of whether agency and short-tenure workers actually received the same induction, training, supervision and hazard-reporting access as permanent staff. It is a singleton: one live record per workspace, reviewed on a cycle rather than raised per worker.

Why review agency workers separately from permanent staff?

Injury rates for agency and temporary workers run higher than for permanent staff in nearly every industry, and the pattern is consistent: a shorter induction, weaker supervision, and less willingness to speak up. A general safety audit will not surface that gap, because it confirms the policy exists without testing whether it reached this population in practice.

What counts as parity of treatment here?

Not identical paperwork, but identical exposure to what keeps someone safe: the same induction content, competency verification, PPE, and inclusion in toolbox talks, evacuation headcounts and consultation on the same terms as anyone else on site.

Scope

When is a temporary and agency worker review required?

This review tests parity of treatment for the general population of agency and short-tenure workers. Where a worker also falls into a specific vulnerable category, age, pregnancy, language, that population has its own dedicated assessment this review should point to rather than absorb.

Use this template when

  • The quarterly review interval has come round, or a trigger event, such as an incident involving a temporary worker, has occurred
  • A new agency labour arrangement has started and needs its first parity check before it becomes routine
  • A hazard report pattern suggests temporary workers are being treated differently in practice, whatever the policy says
  • The competency matrix or agency labour provider assessment needs verification that temporary workers actually appear on it
  • HR and safety need one shared record of induction, training and supervision parity across the current agency population

Do not use it for

  • Young Worker Risk Assessment, the additional risk to workers under eighteen, distinct from temporary or agency status
  • New and Expectant Mother Assessment, the workplace assessment for a worker who is pregnant, has recently given birth or is breastfeeding
  • Language and Literacy Assessment, the dedicated check for whether safety-critical information reaches a worker who does not read the site language fluently
  • Agency Labour Provider Assessment, which vets the agency before the arrangement starts, rather than how workers already on site are treated
  • Vulnerable Worker Register, the standing list of individuals carrying a restriction, which this review feeds into rather than duplicates

Compliance mapping

Which ISO 45001 cl.5.4 requirements does this satisfy?

ISO 45001 does not name agency or temporary workers as a distinct category requiring a separate procedure, but its consultation, operational control and hazard identification requirements apply to anyone doing work under the organisation's control, employment status notwithstanding.

ClauseRequirementWhere it lands
ISO 45001 cl.5.4Consultation and participation extended to workers regardless of employment statusParity of treatment
ISO 45001 cl.8.1.1Operational controls, including PPE and competency verification, applied consistently across the workforceParity of treatment
ISO 45001 cl.7.3Workers aware of their right and duty to remove themselves from imminent danger, and of hazards to reportPractical experience
ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2.1Hazard identification accounts for human and organisational factors, including unfamiliarity and short tenurePractical experience
ISO 45001 cl.7.4Communication effective for its audience, including language and comprehensionPractical experience
ISO 45001 cl.9.1.1Monitoring of OH&S performance, including comparison of outcomes across worker categoriesOutcomes
ISO 45001 cl.8.1.4.3Outsourced functions, of which agency labour supply is one, controlled and coordinatedOutcomes

What it does not cover

  • Young Worker Risk Assessment, which assesses the additional risk to workers under eighteen, a distinct category from temporary status.
  • New and Expectant Mother Assessment, which assesses the workplace for a worker who is pregnant, has recently given birth or is breastfeeding.
  • Language and Literacy Assessment, the dedicated assessment of whether safety-critical information reaches a worker who does not read the site language fluently.
  • Agency Labour Provider Assessment, which vets the supplying agency itself, a pre-contract control this review assumes is in place and only checks remains current.
  • Vulnerable Worker Register, the standing record of individuals carrying a specific restriction, which this review feeds rather than duplicates.

Global

Temporary and Agency Worker Review requirements by country

Regulators increasingly treat agency and temporary status as a risk factor in its own right rather than an employment-law question with no safety consequence.

United States

OSHA Temporary Worker Initiative; General Duty Clause; joint employer responsibility

Host employer and staffing agency share responsibility for a temporary worker's safety training and protection.

A host site cannot rely on the agency having covered training; the initiative expects the host to verify and, where needed, provide it.

United Kingdom

MHSWR 1999, reg.13; Agency Workers Regulations 2010

Employers must account for capabilities when allocating tasks and ensure adequate training from day one, distinct from equal-treatment rights phasing in at twelve weeks.

Safety training and supervision parity cannot be deferred until an agency worker passes a qualifying period; the safety duty applies from the first shift.

International

ISO 45001 cl.5.4 and cl.8.1.4

Consultation and participation duties are not limited to permanent employees, and outsourced work, including supplied labour, must be controlled and coordinated.

A certification audit tests whether consultation records actually name agency workers, not only whether the system document says they are covered.

How to complete it

How to complete a temporary and agency worker review, step by step

The parity fields on this form are easy to answer generously from memory. The practical experience fields are what make the review honest.

Treat shortened induction as a real gap, not a lesser pass

The form scores a shortened induction only one band above a genuinely different one, because skipped content is protection the worker does not have. Do not let shortened read as close enough.

Verify the stop-work message was explicit, not assumed

A worker who can be released tomorrow will not stop a job on an implied understanding. Ask the worker directly whether someone told them, in words, rather than accepting a supervisor's assurance it would have come up naturally.

Check the mechanics, not just the training record

Parity includes whether agency workers appear in the evacuation headcount and are pulled into toolbox talks, facts a training log will not show. A worker fully trained on paper but missed from the muster count has a real gap.

Read the incident and hazard-reporting rate as the real scorecard

A comparison showing temporary workers with a higher incident rate or lower hazard-reporting rate confirms or contradicts everything else on the form. Good parity scores alongside a worse outcome rate mean something got missed.

What auditors find

Most common temporary and agency worker review findings

Findings on this review rarely concern whether agency workers were included in policy. They concern whether the last real shift matched what the policy promised.

FindingClauseWhat fixes it
Induction for agency workers recorded as shortened with no documented equivalence to the content missed.ISO 45001 cl.8.1.1Record which induction content was omitted and how, or whether, it was covered another way before unsupervised work began.
Agency workers absent from the evacuation headcount or excluded from toolbox talks despite equal presence on site.ISO 45001 cl.5.4Add agency workers to the muster count and toolbox talk attendance by default, not as an exception someone has to remember.
Told they can stop work recorded as implied rather than explicit, with no record of who said what.ISO 45001 cl.7.3Require the supervisor to state stop-work authority directly and record when that conversation happened.
Language understood marked partly or no, with no accommodation made for the gap.ISO 45001 cl.7.4Route a confirmed language gap to the Language and Literacy Assessment rather than noting it and moving on.
Agency labour provider assessment overdue, with the review proceeding as though it were current.ISO 45001 cl.8.1.4.3Treat an overdue agency assessment as a blocking finding here, not a parallel item to chase separately.
Incident or hazard-reporting rate for temporary workers worse than permanent staff, with no action raised.ISO 45001 cl.9.1.1Raise corrective action whenever the comparative rate is worse, not only when a serious incident forces the question.

Case in point

Case in point: the induction that was shorter by design

A distribution centre ran a two-hour induction for permanent starters and a forty-minute version for agency workers supplied for peak season, reasoning that agency staff were only picking and packing, not driving, so vehicle-movement content did not fully apply and was dropped from the shortened version.

An agency worker stepped into an aisle to retrieve a dropped item and was struck by a reversing forklift with right of way under rules the forty-minute induction had never covered. The review that followed found the shortened induction had been treated as an acceptable lesser version for three seasons running, because nobody had asked whether picking near moving vehicles needed the same hazard awareness as driving them.

The template

The template, field by field

The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.

41fields
5 sections
Reference
SAF-152
Archetype
Review
Record ID
TAR-2026-000
Scoring
Parity achieved
Direction
High is good
Singleton
Yes
Basis
ISO 45001 cl.5.4
Links
Links Induction, Competency matrix
Tags
Vulnerable, Agency
Sections
5
Fields
41
Follow up fields
3
Repeating sections
0
Links out
4
Field typesOwn ID, generated on saveCase thread and parentPick list from a registryLinked to another templateFollow up, dashed outlineScored

Header

10 fields
Text

Review ID*

Generated on save

Auto sequence. Format TAR-2026-000.

The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.

Single Choice

Status*

Scored

Drives who this goes to next.

  • Planned2 pts
  • In progress2 pts
  • Complete3 pts
  • Deferred0 pts
  • Open0 pts
  • Closed3 pts
  • Overdue0 pts
Date & Time

Date and Time*

Users

Completed By*

Pick List

Site*

From FDN-001 Site NameFilter: Status is Active
Text

Site ID*

Linked

Format SITE-000.

Links to FDN-001 Site ID

Info

The Gap Is Almost Always Induction Depth

Agency workers are injured at higher rates in nearly every industry. The pattern is a shorter induction, weaker supervision and less willingness to ask.

Text

Period Covered*

Users

Reviewed By*

Numeric Answer

Temporary Workers In Period*

Parity of treatment

9 fields
Single Choice

Same Induction As Permanent Staff*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Shortened1 pt
  • Different0 pts
Single Choice

Same Training Requirements*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Same Competency Verification*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Same PPE Provided*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

On The Competency Matrix*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Included In Toolbox Talks*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Sometimes1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Included In Emergency Arrangements*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Counted In Evacuation Headcount*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Sometimes1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Included In Consultation*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts

Practical experience

6 fields
Single Choice

Named Supervisor On First Shift*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Buddy Assigned*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Told They Can Stop Work*

Scored

A worker who can be sent home tomorrow will not stop a job unless told explicitly and repeatedly.

  • Yes, explicitly3 pts
  • Implied1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Language Understood*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Partly1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Asked How It Is Going*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Sometimes1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Reports Hazards In Practice*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Rarely1 pt
  • Never0 pts

Related records

1 field
Text

Competency Matrix ID

OptionalLinked

The matrix these workers should appear on.

Links to TRN-020 Matrix ID

Outcomes

15 fields
Numeric Answer

Incidents Involving Temporary Workers*

Scored
Single Choice

Rate Versus Permanent Staff*

Scored
  • Lower4 pts
  • Similar2 pts
  • Higher0 pts
Numeric Answer

Hazard Reports From Temporary Workers*

Scored
Single Choice

Agency Assessment Current*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Overdue1 pt
  • None0 pts
Text

Assessment ID

OptionalLinked

Links to CON-047 Assessment ID

Single Choice

Agency Informed Of Performance*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Action Required*

Scored

Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.

  • No2 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Priority

OptionalScoredShows if Action Required equals Yes
  • High0 pts
  • Medium1 pt
  • Low3 pts
Text

CAPA ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Action Required equals Yes

Format CAPA-2026-00000.

Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID

Users

Action Owner

OptionalShows if Action Required equals Yes
Date & Time

Next Review Due*

Users

HR*

Signature

Signature*

Users

Safety Lead*

Signature

Second Signature*

SAF-152 · record IDs look like TAR-2026-000 · Links Induction, Competency matrix

Open in Knowella

Run it with agents

From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself

The review itself is a snapshot. What actually protects agency workers is whether the gaps it finds get closed before the next agency starter walks in.

KnowSafe

Compares this review's findings against incident and hazard-report records to confirm whether the parity gap it identifies shows up in outcomes.

KnowTrain

Checks that agency workers named in this review appear on the competency matrix and induction records, rather than being covered by assumption.

KnowContractor

Tracks the agency labour provider assessment against its due date, and flags this review when it runs while that assessment is overdue.

Ella
Ella

Watches for a worsening incident or hazard-reporting gap between temporary and permanent workers, and raises it before the next quarterly cycle.

This template lives in KnowSafe — safety and compliance. Incidents, hazards, permits, inspections and the critical controls behind them.

Meet KnowSafe→

Glossary

Temporary and Agency Worker Review definitions and key terms

Parity of treatment
Equal exposure to induction, training, supervision and workplace inclusion, judged by what actually happened rather than by policy wording.
Agency worker
A worker supplied by a third-party provider, employed by the agency but working under the host site's day-to-day control.
Toolbox talk
A short, informal safety briefing delivered on site, typically at shift start, that this review checks agency workers are included in.
Evacuation headcount
The muster point count confirming everyone on site is accounted for in an emergency, which must include temporary workers to be reliable.
Named supervisor
A specific, identified person responsible for a new worker on their first shift, distinct from a general statement that supervision is available.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about temporary and agency worker review

Why does this review exist separately from a general safety audit?+

A general audit typically confirms a policy exists and applies to everyone, and the gap this review targets is not in the policy but in the practice: a shorter induction, weaker supervision, and less willingness to speak up given a temporary arrangement.

Is a shortened induction acceptable if the tasks are genuinely simpler?+

Only if the specific content omitted genuinely does not apply, and that judgement has to be made and recorded, not assumed. Dropping vehicle-movement content because a worker will not drive breaks down the moment that worker still walks through the same aisles.

How often should this review run?+

Quarterly as the baseline, with an additional review triggered by an incident involving a temporary worker, a new agency arrangement, or a hazard-reporting pattern that suggests something has changed.

What if the agency labour provider assessment is overdue?+

Treat it as a blocking finding rather than a separate item to chase later. An overdue provider assessment means the site cannot evidence the agency itself meets the standard this review assumes.

What does told they can stop work actually require?+

An explicit, direct statement, not an assumption it was covered by general induction content. The form treats an implied understanding as incomplete because a worker who can be released at short notice needs to hear it stated, not inferred.

Who should carry out this review?+

Safety and HR jointly: safety owns induction and hazard content, and HR typically holds the agency relationship and the tenure and turnover data that explains what the numbers mean.

Keep going

Related templates and programmes

Siddarth Singh

Written and reviewed by

Siddarth Singh

Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella

Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.

  • Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
  • MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
  • MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
  • Six Sigma Black Belt
Verify with BCSP →

Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:

  • ISO 45001:2018 clause 5.4, Consultation and participation of workers
  • ISO 45001:2018 clause 8.1.4, Outsourcing
  • OSHA Temporary Worker Initiative and joint employer guidance (US)
  • Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, regulation 13 (GB)
  • Agency Workers Regulations 2010 (GB)

This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.

Start in Minutes, Not Weeks

Launch a Ready-Made Template and Customize It Your Way

Every template is fully editable. Adjust fields, workflows, and branding to match your processes, then deploy to your team instantly.