Knowella

Chemical Risk Assessment Template

A safety data sheet describes a substance. A chemical risk assessment describes what happens when a specific person uses a specific quantity of it, in a specific way, in a specific room. The same product can require respiratory protection in one part of a plant and nothing beyond gloves in another, which is why the sheet is an input rather than an answer.

KnowSafeAssessmentSAF-08651 fields across 6 sectionsFull researchSee the form

Reviewed by Siddarth SinghCSPLast reviewed 16 August 2026

Basis
COSHH principles, ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2
Workspace
KnowSafe
Form type
Assessment
Assesses
The task, not the substance
GHS alignment
HazCom updated to Revision 7

The short version

  • The assessment covers the task, not the substance. Quantity, method, duration, frequency and ventilation determine exposure, and none of them appear on a data sheet.
  • Skin is an exposure route that assessments routinely underweight. Wet work and dermal absorption cause a large share of occupational ill health and are absent from most chemical assessments.
  • OSHA's 2024 final rule aligned the Hazard Communication Standard with GHS Revision 7, the first realignment since 2012, and took effect on 19 July 2024.
  • On 15 January 2026 OSHA extended the compliance dates by four months. Substances moved from 19 January to 19 May 2026 for manufacturers, and employers handling substances now have until 20 November 2026.
  • Mixtures follow later: manufacturers to 19 November 2027, and employers handling mixtures to 19 May 2028.
  • The updated standard changes label elements and safety data sheet content, which means employer training obligations follow rather than being optional.

What this is

What is a chemical risk assessment?

What is a chemical risk assessment?

An assessment of the risk to health from a substance as it is actually used: the quantity, the method, the duration and frequency, the ventilation, the routes by which exposure could occur, and who else is nearby. It concludes with the controls required and whether health surveillance or exposure monitoring is warranted.

Is a safety data sheet an assessment?

No, and treating it as one is the most common error in this area. The data sheet describes the substance's intrinsic hazards and gives general handling advice written without knowledge of your process. The assessment describes exposure arising from your use of it, which is what determines the controls.

Scope

When is a chemical risk assessment required?

This assessment covers a task involving substances. Where a specific regime applies, it takes precedence rather than being replaced by this.

Use this template when

  • Any task involving a hazardous substance, assessed as the task is actually performed
  • Introduction of a new substance, supplier, formulation or method
  • Change in quantity, frequency, duration, location or ventilation for an existing task
  • Following a reported symptom, spill, or exposure incident
  • Where exposure monitoring or health surveillance results indicate controls are not adequate

Do not use it for

  • The safety data sheet, which describes the substance and is an input to this assessment
  • The substance register, which lists what is held on site and where
  • Dermatitis and skin assessment where wet work dominates, which needs its own treatment
  • Process safety management for covered highly hazardous chemicals, which is a distinct regime
  • Fire and explosion assessment under DSEAR or equivalent, which addresses a different consequence

Compliance mapping

Which COSHH principles requirements does this satisfy?

Chemical control is governed by a duty to assess and control in most jurisdictions, alongside a communication regime that has just been substantially updated in the United States.

ClauseRequirementWhere it lands
COSHH reg.6Suitable and sufficient assessment of health risks from substances before work beginsHeader
COSHH reg.7Prevention or adequate control, with PPE only after other measures have been appliedControls
COSHH reg.9Maintenance, examination and test of control measures, including LEV every 14 monthsControls
COSHH regs 10-11Exposure monitoring and health surveillance where required by the assessmentResult
OSHA 1910.1200Hazard communication: labels, safety data sheets and training, updated to GHS Revision 7 in 2024Related records
OSHA 1910.1200(h)Employee training on new label elements and SDS format following the 2024 updateRelated records
OSHA Subpart ZPermissible exposure limits for specific substances with their own monitoring requirementsExposure routes
EU CLP and REACHClassification, labelling and packaging, and exposure scenarios in extended safety data sheetsRelated records

What it does not cover

  • The safety data sheet, which describes intrinsic hazards and is an input to this assessment rather than a substitute.
  • Dermatitis and skin assessment, which addresses wet work and barrier damage that a general chemical assessment usually omits.
  • Process safety management, for covered highly hazardous chemicals, which is a distinct and far more prescriptive regime.
  • DSEAR or explosive atmosphere assessment, which addresses fire and explosion rather than health.
  • Health surveillance, which is a clinical activity triggered by this assessment and recorded separately.

How to complete it

How to complete a chemical risk assessment, step by step

Four things separate an assessment that changes controls from one that reproduces a data sheet.

Describe the task in numbers

Quantity used per occasion, method of application, duration of exposure, frequency per shift, and the room and its ventilation. Those five values determine exposure, and an assessment without them cannot support a control decision or be compared against an exposure limit.

Cover every route, including skin

Inhalation is assessed reliably. Skin absorption, skin contact causing local damage, ingestion through hand-to-mouth transfer and eye contact are routinely thinner. Skin is the route most often underweighted and, across occupational ill health, one of the largest contributors.

Work down the hierarchy and record the rejections

Elimination, substitution with a less hazardous product, enclosure, local exhaust ventilation, then administrative measures, then PPE. Recording why each higher level was rejected is what makes the assessment defensible and is what a regulator asks about after an exposure incident.

State what triggers monitoring or surveillance

Where exposure may approach a limit, or where a substance can cause an identifiable disease with a valid detection technique, the assessment should say so and name the trigger. Health surveillance decided informally later, or not at all, is a common gap that surfaces years after the exposure.

What auditors find

Most common chemical risk assessment findings

Chemical assessment findings concentrate on what the assessment describes rather than on missing paperwork.

FindingClauseWhat fixes it
Assessment reproduces the safety data sheet without describing the task.COSHH reg.6Record quantity, method, duration, frequency and ventilation; those determine exposure.
Skin route not assessed.COSHH reg.6Assess absorption, contact and hand-to-mouth transfer; skin is systematically underweighted.
PPE specified without higher controls being considered and rejected.COSHH reg.7Record why elimination, substitution and engineering control were not used.
LEV relied on with no examination and test record.COSHH reg.9Examine and test at least every 14 months in Great Britain; an untested system is an assumption.
Assessment not updated after a supplier or formulation change.COSHH reg.6Trigger review on any change to product, supplier, method or quantity.
Employee training not updated for the 2024 HazCom label and SDS changes.1910.1200(h)Train on the new label elements and SDS format; employer deadlines run to November 2026 and May 2028.
Exposure monitoring or health surveillance triggers not stated.COSHH regs 10-11Name the trigger in the assessment rather than deciding informally later.
Substances present on site with no assessment because they arrived via maintenance or contractors.COSHH reg.6Control the entry route; unregistered substances arrive through non-procurement channels.
Assessment covers the user but not others nearby.COSHH reg.6Include adjacent workers, cleaners and anyone entering afterwards.
Emergency and spill arrangements not addressed in the assessment.COSHH reg.13Cover foreseeable accidents and incidents alongside routine use.

Case in point

Case in point: the same product, two very different exposures

A plant used a solvent-based cleaner in two places. In the workshop it was decanted into a bottle and wiped onto components in a bay with local exhaust ventilation, perhaps twenty minutes a shift. In a plant room it was sprayed onto overhead pipework, arms raised, for around ninety minutes during a quarterly clean, in a space with no mechanical ventilation.

One assessment covered both, because it was written per product. It reproduced the data sheet hazard statements, specified nitrile gloves and safety glasses, and was reviewed annually. Both uses were recorded as adequately controlled.

The exposures were not comparable. Spraying overhead into an unventilated space produces inhalation exposure orders of magnitude higher than wiping in a ventilated bay, and the raised-arm posture puts the breathing zone directly in the aerosol. The assessment described a product; only one of the two tasks was actually controlled.

The template

The template, field by field

The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.

51fields
6 sections
Reference
SAF-086
Archetype
Assessment
Record ID
RSK-2026-000
Scoring
Risk band
Direction
High is bad
Singleton
No
Basis
COSHH principles, ISO 45001 cl.6.1.2
Links
Links Substance, Job; feeds KnowHealth
Tags
Chemical, Risk
Sections
6
Fields
51
Follow up fields
4
Repeating sections
0
Links out
6
Field typesOwn ID, generated on saveCase thread and parentPick list from a registryLinked to another templateFollow up, dashed outlineScored

Header

12 fields
Text

Assessment ID*

Generated on save

Auto sequence. Format RSK-2026-00000.

The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.

Single Choice

Status*

Scored

Drives who this goes to next.

  • Planned2 pts
  • In progress2 pts
  • Complete3 pts
  • Deferred0 pts
  • Open0 pts
  • Closed3 pts
  • Overdue0 pts
Date & Time

Date and Time*

Users

Completed By*

Pick List

Site*

From FDN-001 Site NameFilter: Status is Active
Text

Site ID*

Linked

Format SITE-000.

Links to FDN-001 Site ID

Pick List

Substance*

From FDN-006 Product NameFilter: Status is Active
Text

Substance ID*

Linked

Format SUB-0000.

Links to FDN-006 Substance ID

Pick List

Task*

From FDN-004 Task Name
Text

Job ID*

Linked

Format JOB-000.

Links to FDN-004 Job Task ID

Single Choice

Assessment Trigger*

ComplaintPermit requirementPlant changePeriodicNew installationAfter an incident
Single Choice

SDS Reviewed*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • No0 pts

The task

6 fields
Text

How It Is Used*

Numeric Answer

Quantity Per Use*

Single Choice

Frequency Of Use*

Scored
  • Rare3 pts
  • Occasional2 pts
  • Routine1 pt
  • Continuous0 pts
Numeric Answer

Duration Per Use Minutes*

Scored
Numeric Answer

People Exposed*

Scored
Text

Concentration Used

Optional

Diluted sanitisers behave very differently from concentrate.

Exposure routes

6 fields
Single Choice

Inhalation Risk*

Scored
  • None4 pts
  • Low3 pts
  • Medium2 pts
  • High0 pts
Single Choice

Skin Contact Risk*

Scored
  • None4 pts
  • Low3 pts
  • Medium2 pts
  • High0 pts
Single Choice

Eye Contact Risk*

Scored
  • None4 pts
  • Low3 pts
  • Medium2 pts
  • High0 pts
Single Choice

Ingestion Risk*

Scored
  • None4 pts
  • Low3 pts
  • Medium2 pts
  • High0 pts
Single Choice

Injection Or Puncture Risk

OptionalScored
  • None4 pts
  • Low3 pts
  • Medium2 pts
  • High0 pts
Single Choice

Reaction With Other Chemicals*

Scored

Mixing acid and chlorine sanitisers releases chlorine gas. This has killed sanitation workers.

  • None credible4 pts
  • Possible1 pt
  • Likely and hazardous0 pts

Controls

11 fields
Single Choice

Can It Be Eliminated*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Possibly2 pts
  • No1 pt
Single Choice

Can A Safer Product Be Substituted*

Scored
  • Yes4 pts
  • Being trialled3 pts
  • No1 pt
Single Choice

Local Exhaust Ventilation*

Scored
  • Effective and tested4 pts
  • Present, untested2 pts
  • None0 pts
Single Choice

General Ventilation Adequate*

Scored
  • Yes3 pts
  • Marginal1 pt
  • No0 pts
Single Choice

Closed System Or Dosing Used*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Highest Control Level Applied*

Scored
  • Eliminate4 pts
  • Substitute4 pts
  • Engineer3 pts
  • Separate or isolate3 pts
  • Administrative1 pt
  • PPE0 pts
Multi Choice

PPE Required*

Safety glassesCut resistant glovesChemical glovesHearing protectionSafety footwearHard hatHi visApronFace shieldRespirator
Single Choice

Emergency Provision Adequate*

Scored
  • Pass2 pts
  • Partial1 pt
  • Fail0 pts
  • N/Aexcluded from denominator
Single Choice

Health Surveillance Required*

YesNo
Single Choice

Exposure Monitoring Required*

NoYes
Text

Exposure Assessment ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Exposure Monitoring Required equals Yes

Links to HLT-006 Assessment ID

Related records

1 field
Text

SDS Review ID

OptionalLinked

The data sheet the assessment was built from.

Links to SAF-085 Review ID

Result

15 fields
Single Choice

Inherent Band*

Scored
  • Low, 1 to 45 pts
  • Medium, 5 to 94 pts
  • High, 10 to 142 pts
  • Very high, 15 to 191 pt
  • Extreme, 20 to 250 pts
Single Choice

Current Band*

Scored
  • Low, 1 to 45 pts
  • Medium, 5 to 94 pts
  • High, 10 to 142 pts
  • Very high, 15 to 191 pt
  • Extreme, 20 to 250 pts
Single Choice

Residual Band*

Scored
  • Low, 1 to 45 pts
  • Medium, 5 to 94 pts
  • High, 10 to 142 pts
  • Very high, 15 to 191 pt
  • Extreme, 20 to 250 pts
Single Choice

Acceptance Authority*

Scored
  • Supervisor3 pts
  • Site lead2 pts
  • Executive plus ALARP1 pt
Users

Accepted By*

Single Choice

Action Required*

Scored

Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.

  • No2 pts
  • Yes0 pts
Single Choice

Priority

OptionalScoredShows if Action Required equals Yes
  • High0 pts
  • Medium1 pt
  • Low3 pts
Text

CAPA ID

OptionalLinkedShows if Action Required equals Yes

Format CAPA-2026-00000.

Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID

Users

Action Owner

OptionalShows if Action Required equals Yes
Single Choice

Review Frequency*

Scored
  • Quarterly3 pts
  • Annually3 pts
  • Every 2 years1 pt
  • None set0 pts
Date & Time

Next Review Due*

Users

Assessor*

Signature

Signature*

Users

Worker Representative*

Signature

Second Signature*

SAF-086 · record IDs look like RSK-2026-000 · Links Substance, Job; feeds KnowHealth

Open in Knowella

Run it with agents

From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself

The assessment is short once the task is described. What fails is the substance that arrived through maintenance and the assessment written per product rather than per task.

KnowSafe

Holds assessments against tasks rather than substances, and links each to the data sheet, the controls specified and the people who perform it.

Ella
Ella

Watches supplier and specification changes for formulation differences, and raises reassessment rather than waiting for the annual review.

KnowHealth

Carries exposure monitoring and health surveillance triggers from the assessment into scheduled activity, including skin surveillance where wet work applies.

KnowMaintain

Schedules LEV examination and test against the systems the assessment relies on, since an untested extraction system is an assumption rather than a control.

This template lives in KnowSafe — safety and compliance. Incidents, hazards, permits, inspections and the critical controls behind them.

Meet KnowSafe→

Glossary

Chemical Risk Assessment definitions and key terms

Exposure route
How a substance reaches the body: inhalation, skin absorption or contact, ingestion, eye contact and injection.
Local exhaust ventilation
Engineering control capturing contaminant at source, requiring examination and test at least every 14 months in Great Britain.
Permissible exposure limit
The OSHA airborne concentration limit for a substance, typically as an eight-hour time-weighted average.
Workplace exposure limit
The equivalent limit in Great Britain, published in EH40 and used to judge adequacy of control.
GHS
The UN Globally Harmonized System of classification and labelling. OSHA's HazCom aligned with Revision 3 in 2012 and Revision 7 in 2024.
Sensitiser
A substance that can cause an allergic response, after which very small exposures provoke a reaction that is not reversible.
Extended safety data sheet
An SDS with exposure scenarios attached, produced under REACH for substances registered above a tonnage threshold.
Adequate control
The COSHH standard: exposure prevented, or where not reasonably practicable, controlled below the limit with good practice applied.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about chemical risk assessment

Is a safety data sheet enough?+

No. The sheet describes the substance's intrinsic hazards and offers general handling advice written without knowledge of your process. The assessment describes what happens when someone uses a stated quantity, by a stated method, for a stated time, in a stated place. The same product can require very different controls in two areas of one site, and the sheet gives identical advice for both.

What changed with OSHA HazCom in 2024?+

The final rule published in May 2024, effective 19 July 2024, aligned the Hazard Communication Standard with GHS Revision 7, the first realignment since the 2012 update to Revision 3. Changes cover hazard classification, label elements including provisions for small containers, safety data sheet content in several sections, and trade secret disclosure of concentration ranges.

When do the HazCom deadlines fall?+

OSHA extended them by four months on 15 January 2026. Manufacturers, importers and distributors evaluating substances now have until 19 May 2026, and employers handling substances until 20 November 2026. For mixtures the dates are 19 November 2027 for manufacturers and 19 May 2028 for employers. During the transition period compliance with the updated rule, the 2012 standard, or both is permitted.

Why is skin exposure so often missed?+

Because inhalation is what exposure limits are written for and what monitoring measures. Skin absorption, local damage and hand-to-mouth transfer have no equivalent limit to compare against, so they are harder to assess and easier to omit. Across occupational ill health, skin routes are a large contributor, and wet work in particular is rarely treated as a chemical exposure at all.

What triggers review?+

Any change to the substance, supplier, formulation, quantity, method, frequency, location or ventilation, plus any reported symptom, spill or monitoring result suggesting control is inadequate. The supplier change trigger is missed most often, because a like-for-like substitution on price can alter the formulation without anyone treating it as a change.

Keep going

Related templates and programmes

Industries this is written for

Siddarth Singh

Written and reviewed by

Siddarth Singh

Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella

Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.

  • Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
  • MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
  • MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
  • Six Sigma Black Belt
Verify with BCSP →

Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:

This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.

Start in Minutes, Not Weeks

Launch a Ready-Made Template and Customize It Your Way

Every template is fully editable. Adjust fields, workflows, and branding to match your processes, then deploy to your team instantly.