What this is
What is a shortage investigation record?
What is a shortage investigation record?
A shortage investigation record establishes why a confirmed quantity discrepancy occurred, working from pick and load paperwork through a physical search before it ever reaches access logs or camera footage. It is an operational cause-finding record, and it is deliberately separate from any decision about who bears the cost.
What is the difference between a shortage and shrinkage?
A shortage is a specific, dated event: this order, this quantity, this discrepancy. Shrinkage is the aggregate, unexplained loss a business measures over a period, often as a percentage of stock value. A pattern of unresolved shortages is one of the things that feeds a shrinkage figure, but the two are measured and investigated differently.
When should security be involved in a shortage?
Only once paperwork and a genuine physical search have failed to explain the gap, and a specific reason exists to look further, whether that is a repeated pattern or a genuine investigative dead end. Involving security or reviewing footage as a first step treats an unproven assumption as a starting point rather than a conclusion.
Scope
When is a shortage investigation record required?
This is the operational instrument for why a quantity gap happened, worked independently of who ultimately pays for it. It is not the commercial recovery process, which only starts once liability against a specific party looks arguable, and it is not the routine variance check run on every cycle count.
Use this template when
- A confirmed shortage exists between the quantity despatched or picked and the quantity received or counted
- The discrepancy was detected internally, through a despatch check or cycle count, not only reported by a customer
- The investigation is happening before any commercial claim or security action is initiated against a person or a carrier
- A shortage has recurred at the same location, material or shift and needs a documented root cause rather than another isolated write-off
- The outcome will feed a downstream inventory adjustment, a freight claim, or a security incident, once cause is actually established
Do not use it for
- Freight Claim Record, which pursues commercial recovery from a carrier once liability for loss or damage is arguable, a question this record does not need to answer
- Stock Count Variance Investigation, which covers routine variance surfaced by a scheduled cycle count rather than a discrete, confirmed shortage event
- Inventory Adjustment Authorisation, which approves posting the adjustment to the system, not the investigation of why the number is wrong
- Carrier Service Failure Record, which covers a carrier missing an agreed service, not a quantity discrepancy in what was delivered
- A security incident report proper, which needs its own evidence chain once deliberate action is genuinely indicated, rather than being the first move on suspicion alone
Compliance mapping
Which ISO 9001 cl.10.2 requirements does this satisfy?
ISO 9001 never uses the word shortage. It treats a quantity discrepancy in what should have been delivered or held as a nonconformity in the process, and clause 10.2 governs how that nonconformity has to be evaluated and closed.
| Clause | Requirement | Where it lands |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001 cl.10.2.1(a) | React to the nonconformity and evaluate the need for action to eliminate the cause, so it does not recur | Outcome |
| ISO 9001 cl.10.2.1(b) | Implement any action needed and review the effectiveness of the corrective action taken | Outcome |
| ISO 9001 cl.10.2.2 | Retain documented information as evidence of the nature of the nonconformity and any subsequent action taken | Header |
| ISO 9001 cl.8.5.1 | Control of production and service provision, including verification that despatch and pick activities were carried out as planned | Paperwork first |
| ISO 9001 cl.8.5.2 | Identification and traceability of product through the process, sufficient to trace its movement history | Physical |
| ISO 9001 cl.7.1.5.1 | Monitoring and measuring resources suitable to confirm quantity and unit of measure accurately | Paperwork first |
| ISO 9001 cl.9.1.3 | Analysis and evaluation of data, including nonconformity trends, to identify patterns needing wider action | Outcome |
What it does not cover
- Freight Claim Record, which pursues commercial recovery against a carrier once liability for the loss is established, a decision this investigation does not make.
- Stock Count Variance Investigation, which handles routine variance surfaced by a scheduled cycle count rather than one confirmed shortage event.
- Inventory Adjustment Authorisation, which is the separate approval to post the correcting entry to the system once a cause is known.
- A security incident investigation, which needs its own chain of evidence once deliberate action is genuinely indicated, rather than being the default first step.
- Any disciplinary or HR process, which follows its own procedure once a named individual is implicated, and does not belong inside this record.
Global
Shortage Investigation Record requirements by country
ISO 9001 imposes the same nonconformity duty wherever it is adopted. What differs by jurisdiction is how much procedural protection surrounds a worker once an investigation drifts from an unexplained number toward suspicion of a person.
ISO 9001 certification (ANAB-accredited bodies); state employment law
No federal regulation of the shortage investigation itself; employment is generally at-will, but state law increasingly requires documented, non-discriminatory process for accusation-based discipline.
There is no legal minimum for how the investigation is run, but a poorly sequenced one that reaches a person too early still creates wrongful-termination and discrimination exposure if it later leads to discipline.
ISO 9001 certification (UKAS-accredited bodies); ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures
Any disciplinary action arising from a theft allegation has to follow a fair, documented process under the ACAS Code.
An investigation that skips to camera footage and interviews before ruling out paperwork causes is exactly the kind of process an employment tribunal treats as unfair, independent of whether the person turns out to be guilty.
ISO 9001 certification (national accreditation under EA); national labour law
Member state labour law generally requires a proportionate, documented process before dismissal for suspected theft, and works councils in several states must be informed or consulted.
A shortage investigation that moves toward a disciplinary outcome without documented paperwork and physical steps first is unlikely to satisfy the proportionality standard several member states apply.
ISO 9001 certification (SCC-accredited bodies); provincial employment standards
Provincial law generally requires just cause to be demonstrable and documented before a for-cause dismissal.
An investigation record that never reaches a clear, evidenced cause makes a later just-cause dismissal considerably harder to defend if the case is challenged.
ISO 9001 certification (JAS-ANZ accreditation); Fair Work Act 2009
Dismissal requires a valid reason and a fair process under the Fair Work Act's unfair dismissal provisions.
Unfair dismissal claims routinely turn on whether the employer's own investigation record shows a fair, sequenced process rather than an assumption reached early and worked backward from.
ISO 9001 as a management system standard
Certification auditors sample nonconformity records for evidence that cause was evaluated and corrective action verified, not for whether any individual case named a culprit.
An auditor reviewing this record wants to see cause and control improvement, and is largely indifferent to whether the shortage was ever pinned on a person.
How to complete it
How to complete a shortage investigation record, step by step
The record's checkboxes confirm that a step was done. What they don't decide is when to stop trusting the paperwork, how wide to search before concluding, and when moving to access or camera review is actually justified rather than reflexive.
Pick records, load records and delivery documents resolve the majority of shortages before anyone walks the floor: a unit of measure mismatch, a mis-picked SKU, a split delivery. Searching a location for stock that was never actually short on paper wastes the physical search on a problem the records had already answered.
Origin location, adjacent locations, the vehicle and returns all need a genuine search, with a named person and a time, not a five-minute look used to justify moving to the next section. Stock that surfaces later, in the wrong place, after a search was marked complete collapses any conclusion reached in the meantime, including one that pointed at a person.
Those fields sit behind a genuine threshold: cause not established by paperwork or physical search, and a deliberate judgement that the exposure of reviewing someone's movements is warranted. It should be recorded as a decision, with a reason, not ticked as the next box in sequence.
Inconclusive is a legitimate outcome only when paperwork and physical steps were genuinely completed, not a way to avoid an uncomfortable finding. Equally, a conclusion pointing toward a person is only defensible if it followed the full sequence rather than skipping straight to it because the case needed to close quickly.
What auditors find
Most common shortage investigation record findings
The findings here are rarely about missing paperwork. They are about sequence: steps marked complete that weren't genuinely done, and a conclusion reached before the record earned it.
| Finding | Clause | What fixes it |
|---|---|---|
| Access or camera review conducted before pick and load records were checked. | Process sequence / ISO 9001 cl.10.2.1(a) | Require the paperwork-first fields to be complete before the access and camera fields are used. |
| Unit of measure not confirmed, and the shortage was a case-versus-each mismatch. | ISO 9001 cl.7.1.5.1 | Confirm unit of measure against the order and the system record before treating the gap as real stock loss. |
| Split delivery not considered when part of the order moved on a separate load. | ISO 9001 cl.8.5.1 | Check despatch records for a split shipment before logging a shortage against the original load. |
| Origin and adjacent locations marked searched without a named person or time recorded. | ISO 9001 cl.8.5.2 | Require a named searcher and timestamp for each location step, not a single unqualified checkbox. |
| Case closed as inconclusive without the paperwork or physical sections genuinely completed. | ISO 9001 cl.10.2.1(a) | Block closure as inconclusive unless every paperwork and physical field is completed, not just present. |
| Access review actioned on suspicion alone, with no documented paperwork trail preceding it. | Process sequence | Require a stated reason, tied to a completed paperwork and physical search, before the access section is used. |
| People spoken to without any record that the conversation was handled without accusation. | ISO 9001 cl.10.2.2 (evidence of action taken) | Record who was interviewed and confirm no accusation was made before a cause was actually established. |
| Pattern across items, locations or shifts not checked, so a repeat issue is investigated as isolated each time. | ISO 9001 cl.9.1.3 | Query prior investigations at the same location or material before closing the case as a one-off. |
| No control improvement identified despite a clear, non-human-error root cause. | ISO 9001 cl.10.2.1(b) | Require a stated control change whenever the cause is systemic rather than a single, one-off mistake. |
| Inventory adjustment posted before the investigation reached a conclusion. | ISO 9001 cl.10.2.2 | Sequence the adjustment authorisation behind the investigation's cause-established field, not run in parallel. |
Case in point
Case in point: the shortage that became an apology
A distribution centre's despatch check found forty units of a labels line short against the pick list for a customer order. Under pressure to close the case the same day, the shift supervisor pulled camera footage covering the picker's shift and reviewed door access logs that afternoon, before anyone checked whether the pick had been split across two totes.
The footage showed nothing conclusive, the picker felt accused for the rest of the shift, and the case moved toward a conversation with HR before anyone opened the picking system's tote log. That log showed a second tote for the same order had gone to a different despatch lane and was still sitting on-site, undelivered.
The forty units were never missing. They were a paperwork problem the access logs and camera footage could never have found, because they were looking at the wrong system entirely. The cost wasn't the count, which resolved itself once the right record was checked; it was a picker treated as a suspect for an error that belonged to nobody.
The template
The template, field by field
The form exactly as it installs. Every field, option, score and conditional rule is editable, and the links to other templates come with it.
5 sections
- Reference
- LOG-028
- Archetype
- Record
- Record ID
- SHRT-2026-000
- Scoring
- Shortages explained
- Direction
- High is good
- Singleton
- Yes
- Basis
- ISO 9001 cl.10.2
- Links
- Links Delivery Confirmation and Security Incident
- Tags
- Claim, Shortage
- Sections
- 5
- Fields
- 45
- Follow up fields
- 3
- Repeating sections
- 0
- Links out
- 4
Header
13 fieldsInvestigation ID*
Auto sequence. Format SHRT-2026-000.
The record's own ID. Other templates point at this value.
Status*
Drives who this goes to next.
- Planned2 pts
- In progress2 pts
- Complete3 pts
- Deferred0 pts
- Open0 pts
- Closed3 pts
- Overdue0 pts
Date and Time*
Completed By*
Site*
Site ID*
Format SITE-000.
Links to FDN-001 Site ID
Material
Quantity Short*
Value
Where Detected*
Customer delivery, internal count, despatch check, or receipt.
- Customer deliverynot scored
- Internal countnot scored
- Despatch checknot scored
- Receiptnot scored
Source Record ID
Immediate predecessor record
Detected*
Most Shortages Are Not Theft
Assuming theft is the fastest way to insult a team and miss a picking error. Work the movement history first, and only reach for the camera when the paperwork is exhausted.
Paperwork first
6 fieldsPick Records Reviewed*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Load Records Reviewed*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Delivery Documents Reviewed*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
System Movements Traced*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Unit Of Measure Confirmed*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Split Delivery Considered*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Physical
6 fieldsOrigin Location Searched*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Adjacent Locations Searched*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Vehicle Searched*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Returns And Damages Checked*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Found Elsewhere On Site*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Customer Recount Requested*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Only then
6 fieldsAccess Records Reviewed*
- Yes3 pts
- No0 pts
Camera Footage Reviewed*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
People Spoken To Fairly*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Pattern Across Items Or People*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Security Assessment Reviewed*
- Yes3 pts
- No0 pts
Handled Without Accusation*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Outcome
14 fieldsCause Established*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Conclusion*
Counting or system error, handling loss, delivery error, or unexplained.
- Driver not at fault3 pts
- Contributory1 pt
- Driver at fault0 pts
- Inconclusive1 pt
Security Incident Raised*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Case ID
Thread key
Adjustment ID
Links to LOG-015 Adjustment ID
Control Improvement Identified*
- Yes2 pts
- No0 pts
- N/Aexcluded from denominator
Action Required*
Raise the action record, then enter its reference here.
- No2 pts
- Yes0 pts
Priority
- High0 pts
- Medium1 pt
- Low3 pts
CAPA ID
Format CAPA-2026-00000.
Links to FDN-014 CAPA ID
Action Owner
Inventory Controller*
Signature*
Warehouse Manager*
Second Signature*
LOG-028 · record IDs look like SHRT-2026-000 · Links Delivery Confirmation and Security Incident
Open in KnowellaRun it with agents
From a document you fill in to a programme that runs itself
The record documents a sequence. What actually goes wrong is the sequence being skipped under pressure to close the case, and a pattern across cases never being connected because each investigation lives in isolation.
Holds the investigation register against delivery confirmation and any linked security incident, and keeps the paperwork-then-physical sequence enforced before access fields unlock.

Flags repeated shortages at the same location, material or shift so a pattern surfaces across cases, and holds every write for approval before it touches a record.
Rolls shortage cause codes into the clause 10.2 nonconformity trend, so a rise in system-error shortages is visible before it becomes an unnamed pattern.
Tracks the CAPA raised against a shortage through to verified closure, rather than leaving a required action unlinked once the investigation itself is closed.
This template lives in KnowLogistics — supply chain execution. Inbound, outbound, inventory, yard, claims, supplier lifecycle and customs.
Glossary
Shortage Investigation Record definitions and key terms
- Shortage
- A specific, dated discrepancy between the quantity that should have been delivered or held and the quantity actually found.
- Shrinkage
- The aggregate, unexplained loss of stock measured over a period, often as a percentage of stock value, distinct from any single shortage event.
- Nonconformity
- In ISO 9001, an output that does not meet a stated requirement, the category a confirmed shortage falls into for the purpose of clause 10.2.
- Root cause
- The underlying reason a shortage occurred, distinct from the immediate symptom of a quantity not matching, and the thing corrective action has to address.
- Unit of measure (UoM)
- The counting unit, each, case or pallet, used at different points in the process; a mismatch between units is a common source of an apparent shortage.
- Split delivery
- An order fulfilled across more than one load or lane, which can make part of it appear short at the original point of check when it has simply moved separately.
- Movement history
- The system record of where a material moved between locations, which a physical search relies on to know where to look before searching blind.
- Corrective action
- The action taken to address the root cause of a nonconformity so it does not recur, and whose effectiveness has to be reviewed under ISO 9001 cl.10.2.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions about shortage investigation record
Is every shortage theft?+
No. Most resolve to a picking, counting, unit of measure or system error. Theft should be treated as the least likely explanation until paperwork and a genuine physical search have failed to explain the gap, not as the default assumption.
When should security or camera footage get involved?+
Only once paperwork and physical search genuinely fail to explain the discrepancy, and there is a specific reason to look further, such as a recurring pattern. It should never be the first step, because it points the investigation at a person before the numbers have been ruled out.
What is the difference between this and a Freight Claim Record?+
This investigates why a quantity discrepancy happened. The Freight Claim Record pursues commercial recovery from a carrier once liability is established. A shortage investigation can generate the evidence a claim later needs, but it does not itself decide who pays.
Can a case be closed as inconclusive?+
Yes, but only if paperwork, physical search and, where warranted, access review were all genuinely completed. Inconclusive used to avoid an uncomfortable finding, or reached before the sequence was exhausted, will not survive review.
Does a shortage need to link to a security incident?+
Only where a pattern or actual evidence points to deliberate action. Raising a security incident on suspicion alone, before the paperwork trail is exhausted, creates exposure to an unfair process complaint if it later leads to discipline.
What does ISO 9001 actually require here?+
Clause 10.2 requires the nonconformity, the shortage, to be evaluated for cause, corrected, and the corrective action's effectiveness reviewed. It does not require the shortage to be solved in the sense of identifying a culprit.
Keep going
Related templates and programmes
Industries this is written for
Programmes this belongs to
Used together in Inventory Accuracy
Storage Location Register
Holds every rack, bay, chamber and yard position where material is stored, with its capacity and conditions
Cycle Count Record
Counts a defined slice of stock while operations continue, rather than shutting the site once a year
Stock Count Variance Investigation
Investigates why a counted quantity did not match the system quantity, before anybody adjusts it
Inventory Adjustment Authorisation
Authorises a change to a system stock figure, with the reason and the evidence behind it
Stock Location Audit
Checks that what the system says is in a location is actually in that location, and nothing else is
Damaged Stock Record
Records stock damaged in storage or handling, how it happened and what was done with it
More in Claims and Exceptions
Freight Claim Record
Pursues a claim against a carrier for loss or damage in transit
Detention and Demurrage Log
Records time a vehicle or container spent beyond its free period, why, and who is liable
Carrier Service Failure Record
Records a carrier failing to deliver the service agreed, covering late collection, missed delivery, refusal or a damaged load
Returns and RMA Record
Authorises and tracks product coming back from a customer, from the request through to disposition

Written and reviewed by
Siddarth Singh
Founder & Chief Executive Officer, Knowella
Certified Safety Professional and industrial and systems engineer with more than a decade inside food supply chain, freight and manufacturing operations. This page was written against the current text of the standards it cites, not against secondary summaries of them.
- Certified Safety Professional (CSP), Board of Certified Safety Professionals
- MBA, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
- MS and BS, The Ohio State University, Industrial and Systems Engineering
- Six Sigma Black Belt
Sources and last review. Reviewed 16 August 2026 against:
- ISO 9001:2015 clause 10.2, nonconformity and corrective action
- ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.5, control of production and service provision
- ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.1.5, monitoring and measuring resources
- ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures (United Kingdom)
- Fair Work Act 2009, unfair dismissal provisions (Australia)
This page is general guidance, not legal advice. Confirm requirements with your jurisdiction’s regulator.